Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

vanity - Post your reviews of "The Hobbit"

Posted on 12/14/2013 6:35:37 PM PST by Perdogg

I saw it last night in HFR 3D. Tickets were $16.75 per adult. The film quality reminded me of something in the late 60s/early 70s in 625-line PAL format, but better of course. I had never seen a HFR film before. Soundtrack was wonderful.

The story was pretty universal; a mixture of themes found in Star Wars, John Carter, Thor, and Game of Thrones. There were some scenes that did make me jump. The barrel scene could have been cutdown a bit. I thought the movie had a conservative theme with the Government of Lake-town mirroring that of the Obama Administration.

I did not recognize Evangeline Lilly, although she is pretty, but I think elf ears make pretty women look hotter. The scenery was beautiful.

I think the movie was worth the admission. Good theatre experience.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Music/Entertainment; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: desolationofsmaug; hollywood; moviereview; thehobbit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: jocon307

HFR = High Frame Rate (48 frames per second instead of 24). 3D imaging has been a hobby of mine for 40+ years. I watched the Hobbit in 3D HFR at an IMAX theater and was blown away by how technically advanced it is. Not only that, but how artistically the scenes were done in 3D. The technical ultra-realism of 3D did not spoil cinematic effect, in my opinion.

I never read Tolkien growing up. After watching the LOTR films, I was inspired to read the Hobbit. The book was obviously written for children, and was tedious to read. I think the film is a great improvement, regardless what the purists think. This film becomes a welcome prequel for LOTR. The story could not have been told in one film, but two films should have been plenty.

One last thing: Smaug is a terrific and everything I’d expect for a dragon!


41 posted on 12/14/2013 11:10:53 PM PST by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

There is a lot of material in the book for one movie. I loved the hobbit and this one. Not perfect but pretty darn well done. All in all jackson is doing justice to the books.


42 posted on 12/15/2013 2:50:40 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: unlearner

My son pointed out some of the deviations are from the Silmilliarian. I haven’t read that in a long time.


43 posted on 12/15/2013 2:54:43 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic

Thanks for your reply. I still haven’t seen any of the new movies in 3D, but years ago I went to a revival showing of “Kiss Me Kate” which was originally shot in 3D. There wasn’t much to it, I’m sure thing are much more souped up now.


44 posted on 12/15/2013 4:25:55 AM PST by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Thanks Perdog. Seeing it this week. For early bird first showings our tickets will be 8.50.


45 posted on 12/15/2013 4:31:20 AM PST by DollyCali (Don't tell God how big your storm is... tell your storm how BIG your God is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DollyCali

That 8.50 is for 3D


46 posted on 12/15/2013 4:35:32 AM PST by DollyCali (Don't tell God how big your storm is... tell your storm how BIG your God is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028

Haven’t you read the book? Are there still people on Earth to whom this story is unknown?


47 posted on 12/15/2013 5:49:40 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts ("It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Excellent movie. Can’t believe they’ve managed to stretch it out into a trilogy, though.


48 posted on 12/15/2013 6:44:57 AM PST by Egon (Apparently, Jimmy Carter DOES need a third term.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I stopped watching any of these after the first LOTR movie(which I found to be fairly good) because I do not like the politics of Peter Jackson. What he did with the visually spectacular but loaded with leftist baggage, King Kong, was reprehensible. the original KK, as dated as it is, still is the best. the 70s Jessica Lang vehicle was laughable and like I already said...the Jackson version was gorgeous, Andy Serkis is a genius. but Jack Black was horribly miscast along with Adrien Brody. and the characters were either wimps, faggots(perhaps pedophile faggots), self absorbed melancholy ridden types or dyed skin zombies. Heroism was cleansed from the original Willis O’Brien Merian C. Cooper vehicle, by Jackson in this remake except when Jackson made into a caricature to be mocked, along with Jackson’s perceived view of racism that he seemed to be apologizing for(apologizing for the 1933 movie).

so I will not give Jackson any more money than he already has pilfered from me......especially when JRR Tolkien who was a highly religious Christian would be horrified to find a Leftist tampering with his masterwork.


49 posted on 12/15/2013 7:43:53 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bender2
Sorry, I cannot help myself... and you are a pretty hot old broad, ya know?

Thanks! :o):o):o)

50 posted on 12/15/2013 8:11:56 AM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I didn’t like that they turne “The Hobbit” into an epic adventure like “Lord of the Rings”

LOTR was huge, The Hobbit was smaller and light-hearted. The moives don’t capture that and add so much that was not in the books

What, was the book not good enough for them? they had to add to it?

I kept looking at the screen and going ‘what is this? this wasn’t in the book”

But... if you are not a purist that way it is an awesome movie. I did like it very much

I was hopping for the fun of the original book. The funny and childish way Bilbo taunts the spiders (calling them “addercop” which is the worst insult you can make to a spider) was gone- replace with horror-story theatrics.

Getting lost in the forest is completely redone- and escaping from the elves smuggled in wine barrels is replaced by a fight scene.

Etc. Etc.

If you like this kind of thing (and I do - especially in 3D!!!) and are not familiar with the books (or don’t care that they took too much literary license on the details) then you will like it.

BONUS: NO detectable liberal bias!


51 posted on 12/15/2013 8:32:40 AM PST by Mr. K (If you like your constitution, you can keep it. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion
I haven't gone to a theater to watch a movie since the Eighties.

It can't possibly be as good as the 1977 Rankin-Bass animated version that first introduced me to Tolkien.

52 posted on 12/15/2013 8:48:42 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (The Left: speaking power to truth since Shevirat HaKelim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ottbmare
Not true. Not in my experience. Maybe teenage boys and guys of 22 don't look, but men in their late twenties until they're in their coffins still look.
A lot depends on how a middle-aged or older woman moves, dresses, and expresses herself. And I don't mean at all in a cheap, flashy, sexy way.

If you had read the rest of the post you would have read about the old guy who was looking worshipfully at me. And, instead of ignoring him, I did look back and realize that although younger men didn't look at me anymore, the oldsters still thought I was a sweet young thing.

It WOULD be nice if you bothered to read everything I wrote instead of JUST the parts you didn't care for. That would be FAIR, in fact, to be judged on ALL that I wrote, wouldn't it?

53 posted on 12/15/2013 8:50:16 AM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator; KC_Lion

As a kid, I loved the 1977 version.


54 posted on 12/15/2013 9:01:51 AM PST by Perdogg (Ted Cruz-Rand Paul 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

55 posted on 12/15/2013 9:06:24 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (The Left: speaking power to truth since Shevirat HaKelim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

I did read it all. I responded to the portions with which I disagree. I did not respond to the entire post because the first and second parts were self-contradictory.


56 posted on 12/15/2013 9:51:58 AM PST by ottbmare (the OTTB mare, now a proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

I highly recommend 3d. I was going to see the 2d but they couldn’t get it to work, so I got to see it 3d for free. It was on one of those mega screens too. I love the Hobbit better than Lord of the Rings. It doesn’t have that little twerp Frodo in it.


57 posted on 12/15/2013 10:04:28 AM PST by snowstorm12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DollyCali

Is it HFR?


58 posted on 12/15/2013 10:17:11 AM PST by Perdogg (Ted Cruz-Rand Paul 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

The movie starts picking up when the spiders show up. I wish I watched Hobbit again before I saw this part 2. I did not want 3d because usually 3d to me is really weird on my eyes and not up to snuff, but so glad they had technical difficulties and I got to see 3d. Maybe they improved 3d in the last 2 years from what it used to be? The way they chose to end the movie, the cutoff point, was a very odd choice. I really like this actor for Bilbo. Freeman is his name? he does a great job. all these new actors I liked quite a bit.


59 posted on 12/15/2013 10:50:04 AM PST by snowstorm12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028

what books are you referencing?


60 posted on 12/15/2013 12:44:30 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson