http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:Motor-Alternator_Self-Looped_System_by_Joe_Tomicki
Posted on 01/15/2014 4:26:24 PM PST by Kevmo
There is no anti-LENR side,
***Ok, then perhaps we need to go back to calling them seagulls.
Now my professional ethics are called into question
***You betcha
Do you think it meant low output?
No they don't.
I challenged you to find a claim that they fundamentally violate some known physical law. Now, I was willing to cut you a break, and warn you that you won't find anyone who says that, but I am also content to send you off on a wild goose chase. At least it will keep you off the streets tonight.
If you're determined, by all means, find me a physicist who says that the discovery of HTSC's overthrows years of previously established scientific results.
Go on.
Bugger off.
And don't come back until you do.
Nope never been done. Never.
We agree: it's a pure hypothetical. Not an actual experiment.
So there were not 14,000 experiments, just 150 experiments repeated 14,000 times.
"They laughed at me at the academy! Laughed! But I was able to repeat my reanimation of corpses 14,000 times, even if no one else was! 14,000 TIMES!"
Now, was it 150 dead horses, or corpses, or the same corpse in 150 different poses? 'Cause that's what cold fusion is. A dead horse. And a bunch of poseurs with dead careers. 14000 times.
You will be engulfed in a virtual tar baby concerning the true meaning of "output." Is it power? Is it energy? Is it amps? Does it matter? Where does it say 83 volts? Does say it 20,000 seconds of output, or is that a hypothetical equal to 1 Watt + 1 Watt?
Or was it simply a man in a red and white suit delivering lumps of coal to Kevmo's house this past Christmas, unable to discern their BTU content? And if that man did not ride the Polar Express what does it have to do with trains, who cares about trains, or that shattering triumph of mathematical wizardry, the Thermal CalculatorTM?
These and many other deliberate and comical obfuscations await you in the Low Energy World, where nothing is real, everything is hypothetical, and Kevmo rules. [And all may be found on this increasingly ridiculous thread.]
Kevmo doesn’t understand basic units. You are wasting your time,
Trying to communicate intelligently.
I’m starting to believe you might actually be able to wear out a paste buffer.
Yep. Try to inject logic or formality into the conversation, and all he has to do is increase his posting frequency to deflect it.
what a sad spectacle
i think they may be running out of suckers’ money, as the claims become more outlandish
http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:Motor-Alternator_Self-Looped_System_by_Joe_Tomicki
Why should I bother saying what I think? The asshole skeptopath brigade will argue against whatever they want to argue against, regardless of what I say. I’m asking him to say what he thinks. If he responds, maybe I’ll respond. The problem with the Skeptopath Luddite Asshole Bandwagon (SLAB ) bunch is that they don’t answer questions, they don’t further science, they just ridicule and throw zingers and key up on what some other idiot freeper (who was wrong in the first place) jumped at.
This layout reminds me of a baseball diamond sans the 36V battery charger.
It also reminds me of the great Abbot and Costello routine. Who’s on first, WATT is on second and Kevmo is on third.
Many FReepers who aren’t in the business would be running the base skeptopaths and playing SS. They need umpires not to be confused with amperes, Kevmo.
No offense, just an observation to whom it may concern.
Kevmo look at all the power density in that self-looped alternator!
Why, you could power all of civilization with it!
Unlimited free power!
I have yet to see an original kevmo thought that is not cutnpasted from somewhere.
I asked kevmo how much energy a 100w light bulb consumes in one hour (easy question for any h.s.physics student) and his response is to ratchet up the fantastical claims. (100 watts in, 150 watts out!)
1 watt-second per joule.
Kevmo, cancel the units in that equation and see what is left.
“1 watt-second per joule.”
Ah, it’s the formula du joule.
Kevmo, I’m telling you in the nicest possible way, blp claims (’power density’) are a load of bollocks.
Kevmo, please do not invest any of your own money in this. I may ridicule what you say. But genuinely do not want to see the naive taken in and suffer financially from an obvious scam.
Kevmo, if on the other hand you are getting paid to hype this company, as one EE to another, I urge you to review the IEEE code of ethics and ask yourself if promoting this company is ethical.
I'm curious what you think “Low Energy” refers to, but if you don't know, that's fine.
they don’t answer questions, they don’t further science,
It's awful, this reluctance to throw the Coulomb Barrier on the ash heap of history, based on an experiment by some con artist. Or based on some Chinese guy supposedly adding up 14,000 successful trials.
Buncha ingrates.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.