Posted on 01/15/2014 4:26:24 PM PST by Kevmo
Wow. You really are a complete dunce
***Oh what are you whining about now? Did I mistype some unit? Was it supposed to be converted to Assholes/byte or some train nerd unit?
you can’t even keep up with your own side of the argument. You’re the one claiming that HTSC’s fundamentally change science in the same way LENR does.
***Yes it did. Before 1987, HTSCs were done in a completely different material, and then huge progress was made in Ceramics, which was completely nonobvious.
No they don’t.
***You can argue against what I didn’t express all you want, it’s still a straw argument.
I challenged you to find a claim
***I’ll fetch just as soon as you fetch. You never do, so why should I?
that they fundamentally violate some known physical law.
**So that you can force the conversation into a straw argument. Naturally, even when I didn’t go there, you did, continuing your high asshole index straw argument.
Now, I was willing to cut you a break,
***Horseshit.
and warn you that you won’t find anyone who says that, but I am also content to
***argue against the straw position you set up. As usual.
send you off on a wild goose chase. At least it will keep you off the streets tonight.
***Of course that’s what you do. You don’t really reason, you jump down to the gutter level intellect of logical fallacy on basically every post. Like the 9th grader you are.
If you’re determined, by all means, find me a physicist who says that the discovery of HTSC’s overthrows years of previously established scientific results.
***I’ll fetch just as soon as you fetch. But you don’t even answer simple questions, simple hypotheticals. You really are a complete dunce.
Go on. Bugger off.
***You first. If you’re such a grand scientist, why is it we don’t see you on the LENR theory threads? Because you’re a poseur.
And don’t come back until you do.
***You first, asshole.
And you can’t even address the hypothetical on the simplest level.
Is an energy density of 50 higher than an energy density of 10? Go ahead and use whatever units you want, we know how ridiculously anal you are about such things in your quest to ignore the science behind LENR claims.
So there were not 14,000 experiments, just 150 experiments repeated 14,000 times.
***Then you acknowledge this Anomalous Heat Effect has been replicated at least 150 times, as per the review done by National Instruments. That means you are arguing against an established scientific fact.
So there were not 14,000 experiments, just 150 experiments repeated 14,000 times.
***If it were as you say, that’s 150*14000 replications. That situation is even more of an established scientific fact than what I’ve been saying. Jeez, you’re a dunce.
Now, was it 150 dead horses, or corpses, or the same corpse in 150 different poses? ‘Cause that’s what cold fusion is. A dead horse. And a bunch of poseurs with dead careers. 14000 times.
*** Jeez, you’re a dunce. A scientific fact isn’t a fact just because someone’s career hasn’t brought them fame? Or is it that they failed to suck on the guvmint teat and defraud the taxpayers like you did for all those years?
Careful.
You will be engulfed in a virtual tar baby concerning the true meaning of anything, as long as FraudZagonner is involved. Does he answer any question put to him? Is it power? Is it energy? Is it amps? Does it matter? Where does it say 83 volts? Does he address hypotheticals at 20,000 seconds of output, or the a hypothetical equal to 1 Watt + 1 Watt? How about 1 Asshole + 1 Asshole, is it 2 skeptopaths or are asshole skeptopaths worth more than genuine scientists looking for the truth?
Or was it simply a man in a red and white suit delivering
Guvmint jobs like his? When he sucks on the guvmint teat, does he output skittles along with his unicorn farts?
Are the units in lumps of coal or are they FraudZagonnerAssholes? Does FZ believe in Santa Clause jumping down the chimney at Christmas, unable to discern reality? Does it take BTU content to get that asshole to stop posting logical fallacies? And if that man did not ride the Polar Express what does it have to do with trains, who cares about trains? Does that 9th grader have any evidence that he published anything even remotely useful the Thermal CalculatorTM?
These and many other deliberate and comical obfuscations await you in the Skeptopathic world, where nothing is real, including scientists who’ve spent entire careers in Nuclear Physics. But even on the slightest is hypothetical, FRaudZagonner can’t answer the question, but prefers to just hurl insults like “Kevmo rules. [And all may be found on this increasingly ridiculous thread.]
There, I fixed it for ya.
vmpolesov
Jumped on a bandwagon when he saw assholes ganging up on someone, and PRESUMED that it was over some major point of science. He didn’t look upthread to verify it. But at least with all this one-sided invective, it means the thread will stay open so he’s provided a service in a small way.
The day Moonboy injects logic into the discussion on the science behind these matters will be the day after Rossi sells his 5000th unit.
You would no doubt be interested in Dilbert’s power generating invention, where he extracts methane from people’s rear ends. It involves shoving a tube up your rectum, so we know that you would derive double enjoyment from it.
Look at Dilbert’s invention, vmp! It’s your dream come true! And when I tell you to shove it up your ass, it will finally be power generating advice.
You asked...
I Asked...
But I asked first, so until you answer simple stuff, there’s no reason for me to play fetch.
Why is it somehow a lack of knowledge when I don’t answer your 100W lightbulb question but it isn’t a lack of knowledge when you can’t answer what 1W + 1W is? Is an energy density of 150 (use whatever units you see fit) greater than an energy density of 100? Pretty simple stuff that even a 6th grader can answer.
What are you whining about now?
Kevmo, I’m telling you in the nicest possible way, blp claims (’power density’) are a load of bollocks.
***Then it should be easy for you to address the questions. To be candid, I wasn’t even thinking about BLP when I was asking about power density.
Kevmo, please do not invest any of your own money in this. I may ridicule what you say. But genuinely do not want to see the naive taken in and suffer financially from an obvious scam.Kevmo, please do not invest any of your own money in this. I may ridicule what you say. But genuinely do not want to see the naive taken in and suffer financially from an obvious scam.
***If it’s a scam, at best it is to the tune of $60M. The controlled-hot-fusion scam is to the tune of $600B, 4 orders of magnitude higher than the one you’re so “concerned” about. Do we see you on hot-fusion threads generating 4 orders of magnitude more invective than here? No. Concern troll is very concerned.
Kevmo, if on the other hand you are getting paid to hype this company, as one EE to another, I urge you to review the IEEE code of ethics and ask yourself if promoting this company is ethical.
***I would say the same thing to you about the hot-fusion scam and your ethics, which are 4 orders of magnitude out of whack compared to anything discussed in LENR.
Kevmo, if on the other hand you are getting paid to hype this company, as one EE to another, I urge you to review the IEEE code of ethics and ask yourself if promoting this company is ethical.
Or based on some Chinese guy supposedly adding up 14,000 successful trials.
***Wow. You guys are throwing the Chinese Academy of Science under the bus? You’re assuming they can’t even COUNT?
WOW. Just WOW.
Perhaps it’s just because they’re chinese. You know, cultural bigotry. Then how about the 150 peer reviewed replications cited by National Instruments? Are they under the bus as well? Probably. Just WOW.
Nope, just your silly source.
Perhaps it’s just because they’re chinese. You know, cultural bigotry.
Right, my mockery of your silliness is due to bigotry. LOL!
tell you what kevmo. if blacklight power ever produces a commercial power reactor generating 1MW of power I will admit it was wrong
Chinese Academy of Science IS my source. Just look at all the organizations, companies, and scientists you guys throw under the bus. The pile is getting bigger with each passing month.
They listed all 14,000 "successful tests"? Show me.
The pile is getting bigger with each passing month.
Yup, that's a big pile of nuts you keep throwing at us.
Yup. They sure did. And all I get from you skeptopaths is crickets, bullshit, snide remarks, insults, and anti-science Luddite remarks.
—————————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg85732.html—————————
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.