Posted on 01/30/2014 1:13:40 PM PST by Uncle Chip
How many times should one be expected to face these prosecutors? I guess the answer is, "as long as it takes."
In order to get a first hand look at justice in Perugia, be sure to read "The Monster of Florence" by Doug Preston and Mario Spezi.
I liked Singapore.
What's there about her that a liberal wouldn't love?
Leni
No idea if she is guilty or not, but, I think Amanda will speak Italian like a native before she ever sees another day of freedom.
She served plenty of time there but she is free and back in the states now.
What the hell kind of an argument is that???????
Sounds to me like you're a woman hater who believes that any woman accused of any crime is automatically guilty despite the ruling of a country's supreme court.......
You're creepy.........
Can we send Casey Anthony to Italy?
Ouch! Good point. I think he’s an “honorary black guy.”
“Is there anything the Italians dont make a mess of?”
They make good supercars?
Since you’ve followed the case so closely, tell me this: Why was there forensic evidence linked to Guede (footprints, hair, skin, other DNA) all over the crime scene, but none from Knox?
Go sign a position for Mumia or Bill Ayers.
I blame Meredith Kercher’s parents; they’ve been pushing for Amanda to be retried and this time around, convicted. Meredith’s parents refuse to accept that the real killer was arrested and tried and convicted and that Amanda had nothing to do with it. Amanda was just the roommate, that’s all.
Like Fiats?
there was a long in depth article about the trial, it was as you said. Whaacko prosecutor.
And just how did you arrive at that conclusion? Do you know Knox, or something that the Italian courts do not? If so, do tell.
Yeah, she does have a certain “rode hard, put up wet” quality about her....
No but the prosecutor did.
Not just that, but she was forced to stay in the jail until the evidence clearly showed that she was entirely innocent.
She did not live with a guy.
Being around drugs? That makes her guilty?
As for 'nonexistent' evidence, there were the six 37 bloody footprints found on the carpet with luminol, the same size as Amanda's shoes. There were the five drops of blood in the bathroom mixing Amanda's and Meredith Kercher's DNA. Of the two knives used to kill Amanda Kercher, one matched in size and length one of Amanda's kitchen knives, which had Amanda's DNA on the handle and Kercher's DNA on the blade.
There was Amanda's purchase of cleaning products after the murder, the mopping of Kercher's bathroom floor, and Amanda's borrowing of her boyfriend's mop.
There was Amanda taking a shower in the bathroom after the murder and claiming not to see the bloody footprint on the bath mat.
There was more.
On the other hand, Amanda was subjected to police misconduct and prosecutorial misconduct. She was subject to Anti-American prejudice.
The media tried her case in public, using Amanda's inadmissible journal and inadmissible witness statements.
We've discussed evidence, innocent arguments for evidence, Italian misconduct, and the confession of Rudy Guede (which places Amanda and her boyfriend at the scene with him) at some length in this earlier thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.