[BuckeyeTexan]

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

[FlingWingFlyer]

Her “compelling life story” would have been more “compelling” if her mother believed the same garbage that she does.

[Revel]

The USSC has been stacked by Satin himself. I would not count on them for anything good.

[Proud2BeRight]

Evil. Pure evil.

[Nachum]

Wisa-ass Latina.

[A_Former_Democrat]

The Wise Latina: the Poster Babe for why “affirmative action” should be shyte canned.

[Aria]

What else would we expect from someone placed on the SCOTUS by the baby killing communist?

[Sarah Barracuda]

Would have been nice if her mother had gone to a Planned Parenthood office when she conceived that piece of crap..notice the ones who love abortion have themselves never been aborted..I wonder, if their mothers had killed them, would they have been in favor of it?

[Blood of Tyrants]

To a leftist who has accepted that it is perfectly fine to rip an unborn baby out of the womb and murder it, I guess that to them it is nothing more that a hangnail or a vaccination.

[slumber1]

So what. If a corporation doesn’t want to cover blood transfusions or vaccinations where does the government derive the authority to force them to do so?

This isn’t a question of religious liberty. It’s a question of liberty period. The fact that we have a Supreme Court justice even suggesting such a thing tells me our freedom is lost. I have no confidence in this court to uphold any of the freedoms guaranteed by the constitution.

[rockinqsranch]

“Justice Sotomayor started by asking, if corporations can object on religious grounds to providing contraception coverage, could they also object to vaccinations or blood transfusions?”

To Sotomayor, They aren’t. Quit diverting the focus.

[BenLurkin]

Hideous person. Hideous countenance. Hideous heart.

Hussein is a real bastard.

[beethovenfan]

Sez the wide Latina.

[Lurking Libertarian]

That's misreading what she said. Her point is that if corporations don't have to pay for contraception or abortion if they object to them on religious grounds, wouldn't the same rule mean that corporations owned by Jehovah's Witnesses wouldn't have to pay for blood transfusions (which their religion objects to). The answer to her question is probably "yes." If corporations have Free Exercise rights (and I believe they do), the government can't pick which religions to accommodate and which not to.

Goodness knows, there are plenty of reasons to criticize Sotomayor, but this question isn't one of them-- it's standard for judges during oral argument to ask hypothetical questions to probe how a ruling for this party will affect future cases.

[onedoug]

Just when one thinks liberalism could not rise any higher in its amazing stupidity, along comes the Wise Latina.

[Salvation]

**Justice Sotomayor Compared Abortions to Vaccinations, Blood Transfusions in Hobby Lobby Case**

I don’t think so.

Abortions kills.