Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George Will: ‘I’m an amiable, low voltage atheist’
Daily Caller ^ | 9:10 PM 05/03/2014 | Jamie Weinstein

Posted on 05/04/2014 12:34:25 PM PDT by Olog-hai

Legendary conservative columnist George Will says he is an atheist. […]

“I’m an amiable, low voltage atheist,” Will explained. “I deeply respect religions and religious people. The great religions reflect something constant and noble in the human character, defensible and admirable yearnings.”

“I am just not persuaded. That’s all,” he added. …

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: atheist; fakeconservative; georgefwill; georgewill; homosexualagenda; libertarians; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 581-583 next last
To: Yardstick

What is the interesting part?


281 posted on 05/05/2014 5:08:42 PM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

You don’t know what the interesting part is? You must not be a person but rather an algorithm running from a C prompt somewhere. Apparently you’ve never experienced your own consciousness and had the inevitable interesting questions come up.


282 posted on 05/05/2014 5:18:28 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
You have to have an IQ above 70 to delve the things of the Lord.

You're right. The mechanics of geocentrism are inaccessible to us mouth breathers.

283 posted on 05/05/2014 5:25:29 PM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

I see you can not answer.

All hat.


284 posted on 05/05/2014 5:46:58 PM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Right. Thanks for playing, little program.


285 posted on 05/05/2014 5:52:43 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
John Derbyshire

I really liked his book "Unknown Quantity: A Real And Imaginary History of Algebra."

286 posted on 05/05/2014 5:56:21 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
As for “rape not being morally wrong”, thanks for admitting you never read Deuteronomy 22:25.

Yes, I have, many times. It never says it's morally wrong to rape a woman, it says that if a betrothed woman and a man have sex, they are to be killed, but if it was rape, they spare her. There is no additional stigma mentioned against him for the rape, she is merely excused from having participated. Sex is the crime, not rape. And note, she has to be married or betrothed. Know why? Because the crime is not against her, it's against the man whose property she is. That's Middle Eastern mentality in big, bright lights.

This is proven by reading a little further to 22:29 wherein we find if she is not betrothed, she has to marry her rapist. Clearly rape is no problem to the God of the Middle East. Never has been. You can rape your wife, rape your slaves, rape a virgin and make her marry you. You just can't sully other men's property.

287 posted on 05/05/2014 5:57:15 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

And by the way, can you point to the chapter and verse that tells exactly how old Isaac and/or Ishmael was? Then we can settle that one.


288 posted on 05/05/2014 5:58:27 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

Your mouth is down there?


289 posted on 05/05/2014 6:03:38 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

“It never says it’s morally wrong to rape a woman” yet it clearly proscribes the death penalty for rapists. Remarkable POV, never mind the conscious conflation of adulterers/fornicators and rapists.

No rape is indicated in Deuteronomy 22:28; the same word is not used as in verse 25 (”taphaz” in verse 28, meaning to manipulate and therefore seduce, versus “khazaq” in verse 25, meaning to seize by force). Being mendacious is very unhelpful.


290 posted on 05/05/2014 6:04:56 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

So what happens if you khazaq a virgin?


291 posted on 05/05/2014 6:10:48 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
What did you find persuasive, in theism’s stead?

The fact that the claims of theism were simply unknowable, and that theism's advocates were claiming knowledge of things they couldn't possibly know.

292 posted on 05/05/2014 6:18:51 PM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
Beliefs determine morality.

The important thing is that beliefs do not determine reality. Morality is a way for mankind to deal with reality.

And "without God, everything is permissible."

A silly assumption. On the contrary, everything is permissible if you believe God is on your side.

293 posted on 05/05/2014 6:21:05 PM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Can you describe why rape is wrong? I know you believe that it is prohibited by supernatural fiat, but why? What is the reason it is wrong?


294 posted on 05/05/2014 6:25:07 PM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

Language itself presumes it.


295 posted on 05/05/2014 6:28:24 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

How to you arbitrate?


296 posted on 05/05/2014 6:29:41 PM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
On the contrary, everything is permissible if you believe God is on your side.

Or will forgive you as soon as you ask.

297 posted on 05/05/2014 6:31:07 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

No, not with the God of the Bible. There are different opinions on the matter of course, but one absolute theme in that book is that those who go against the law in that book and refuse to repent of going that way are not going to be forgiven of their acts.


298 posted on 05/05/2014 6:34:29 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

The god of Islam says it’s morally necessary to lie. The Christian God forbids lying. Therefore they cannot be the same.

God forbids murder, not killing.

The definition of God as accepted by Christians is not variable.

God created the universe, sustains it as we speak, and he gives us life. His authority to tell us what’s right and what’s wrong is immeasurable.

Another person telling you or me what they think is right or wrong, or a group of people telling us—this is still subjective.


299 posted on 05/05/2014 6:35:30 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

You can’t speak without presuming access to objectivity.


300 posted on 05/05/2014 6:37:56 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 581-583 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson