[freedumb2003]

>>Wow. Talk about exposing your ignorance. So, you don’t need to explain how simpler life originated from non-life in order to explain how more complex life originated from from simpler life? So, expecting your origin story to include... you know, an origin is unscientific? So physics, biology, cosmology, and geology are thoroughly useless for explaining how life got here in the first place?<<

Did someone slip you a “canards for TToE” crib sheet? TToE explains how stochastic processes created species over long periods of time. My statement is (upon extension) if you attack TToE based on abiogenesis then you must also attack physics, geology, cosmology, etc. on the same basis. There is no specific onus on TToE to refer back to The Beginning. Unless you also think Physics must justify its tenants.

>>So you’re admitting evolution isn’t even remotely scientific, can’t be explained by or incorporated into any scientific discipline, and you basically believe in it only because otherwise you and a lot of your fellow mythologists at schools everywhere would be out of a job?<<

I work in IT. I have been pretty clear that TToE is completely scientific and it is rubes like you who do not understand science that make Conservatives a target for libtards who say we are anti-science.

>>Why didn’t you just say so in the first place? Just because hobbits don’t really exist doesn’t mean we all wouldn’t appreciate your telling us an entertaining story about them, you know. Just ask J.R.R. Tolkien. <<

The only thing good about straw men is that in real life you can make s’mores if you have all the ingredients. Your straw men are just evil.

[Parody]

>>I work in IT. I have been pretty clear that TToE is completely scientific and it is rubes like you who do not understand science that make Conservatives a target for libtards who say we are anti-science.<<

So in other words, the reason you keep spewing your materialist myth is because you’re afraid you won’t look “scientific” enough to our enemies.

It’s a lost cause, dude. You disagree with any “libtard” (I prefer the term “leftard”) scientific tenant, such as evolution, the gay gene, or the inherent benevolence of all government spending (the Tooth Fairy doesn’t provide enough welfare entitlements to suit them), and you are immediately to be shunned as dumber and less scientific than a flat-earther. You can’t help the insane by going insane yourself. If I were you, I’d concentrate less on trying to impress your leftard enemies with how “scientific” you are and try looking for what’s true rather than what’s popular.

I used to believe in theistic evolution myself, but then I started asking why exactly I had to reinterpret everything I believed to impress a bunch of Hell-bound fools who despised everything I believed, and realized that I could do just fine without believing in materialist miracles like something from nothing, life from non-life, and order from chaos.

Miracles are all very fine and possible (though rare), but I cannot believe in miracles without a miracle worker. Neither do I believe that a miracle worker is at all constrained by what a bunch of materialist mythologists at a college for fools think of him.