He thinks this GOP is more conservative than that of Reagan’s admin. What does that tell you?
It tells me he does not know his history, among other things.
Without even trying, anyone with a sense of history can rattle off at least a couple dozen names of proabortion liberal Republicans who served during Reagan's term. Packwood, Kassebaum, etc.
I'm supposed to vote Republican, because that Republican will be so much better than the Democrat, and they'll have control of all the wonderful committees and appropriations.
Never mind the fact that said Republican endorses everything the Democrat believes in, completely accepts the Left's narrative on every issue, and argues from a defensive, whiny standpoint so the NY Times won't scream bold font at them.
I'm supposed to support a Republican candidate, and by extension the political party, a party that has generally said nothing and have done nothing about Obama's power grabs and the advancement of the Leftist agenda.
I've looked back on history since TR's third-party run, and I've read all about the Republican losers who completely bit the dust after being told that they can only win by supporting most of their opponent's agenda.
Then I look at the Republican landslides of 1972, 1980, 1984, 1994, and 2010.
Again, where is the logic?