Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should we let 16 year olds vote?
The Volokh Conspiracy ^ | September 19, 2014 | Ilya Somin

Posted on 09/19/2014 2:56:32 PM PDT by right-wing agnostic

Scotland allowed 16 and 17 year olds to vote in yesterday’s historic referendum on independence. Georgetown political theorist Jason Brennan, author of the excellent book The Ethics of Voting, makes a strong case that the United States should do the same thing:

Scotland decided to trust its 16-year-olds to vote in the biggest question in its history when the country headed to the polls this week for a referendum on independence. Americans, in contrast, don’t even trust theirs to help pick the county sheriff. Who’s right?

Many here might be skeptical about the idea of the United States following Scotland’s lead in lowering the voting age. The trouble is that the main reason most people cite for barring 16- and 17-year-olds from voting looks like an equally good reason to stop most American adults from voting, too.

The key argument against letting high school juniors vote is simple: Their choice would affect all of us. After all, a voter chooses for everyone, not just him or herself. Many worry that most 16-year-olds lack the wisdom or knowledge to cast smart votes, so we don’t let them vote because we want to protect ourselves from their decisions.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: unitedstates; votingage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: right-wing agnostic

They shouldn’t have lowered it to 18.


21 posted on 09/19/2014 3:08:44 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

No.


22 posted on 09/19/2014 3:09:52 PM PDT by Fungi (Do not read this post if you are nervous about tomorrow. I am so I will not read it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc
Universal suffrage is a problem. The privilege to vote should not be an "age qualified" privilege.

The age of 18 was adopted in the Viet Nam war era, old enough to be drafted and be killed in combat; not old enough to vote. I submit that not all draftees are qualified to vote; but if any group of people has a moral right to vote, it is those subject to the draft. Those on the government teat have the wrong side of their skin in the game, and ought to be denied the vote.

23 posted on 09/19/2014 3:10:37 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

Voting age should be raised to 25, and no women voters. putting on my nomex suit


24 posted on 09/19/2014 3:10:41 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

Voting at 16?

Uhmmmm, sure and you can make them fully, wholly and solely responsible for contracts.

They are fully emancipated.

They can smoke.

They can drink.

They can shoot foreigners in wars.

Statutory rape would only apply to those under 16 years of age.

they could filmed in certain provacative situations.

Yeah, cuz most 16 year olds are ready to handle life, its vagaries and stark consequences.

/S


25 posted on 09/19/2014 3:11:50 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

Five year olds...definitely five year olds!


26 posted on 09/19/2014 3:11:53 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Figment

Really, newbie?


27 posted on 09/19/2014 3:11:55 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

I don’t think it makes much difference one way or the other.


28 posted on 09/19/2014 3:12:59 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

nope, i’d be in favor of making it that only property owners (ie LAND/HOME property tax payers) vote.


29 posted on 09/19/2014 3:13:00 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

It should be raised to 21. (Because raising it to 40 is a bridge too far)


30 posted on 09/19/2014 3:13:25 PM PDT by cripplecreek ("Moderates" are lying manipulative bottom feeding scum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

Yes, because children are so wise.


31 posted on 09/19/2014 3:14:19 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Conservatism is the political disposition of grown-ups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

Hell no.

What we should do, and there is just about no way it will ever happen short of my dream, is go back to the original plan and only let landed persons vote... I’d give women a pass though it is against my better judgement but that would be my concession.

Raise the voting age to 21 as well.


32 posted on 09/19/2014 3:14:54 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic
Scotland decided to trust its 16-year-olds to vote in the biggest question in its history when the country headed to the polls this week for a referendum on independence

One wonders… Did they recently have a huge influx of "undocumented" minors crossing its southern border from a country with a vested interest in the outcome that ended up participating the referendum ??

33 posted on 09/19/2014 3:15:02 PM PDT by mikrofon (Weekend BUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: workerbee
I say raise the voting age to 30.

Agree. As per Article I Section 2, and the 17th Amendment, the states could do that for reps and senators anytime they wish.

34 posted on 09/19/2014 3:15:31 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Article V. If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

If you live with your parents, they should vote for you.


35 posted on 09/19/2014 3:15:38 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyranni)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: workerbee

I agree and I am serious about it too.


36 posted on 09/19/2014 3:15:39 PM PDT by RatRipper (No need to rob others; democRATS will steal and share a tiny bit with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

Apparently 25 is the right number.

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-24173194


37 posted on 09/19/2014 3:15:49 PM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hadaclueonce

I agree that you must own property and pay taxes to vote. Otherwise we have the problem we have now, the takers become the majority and vote to take everything. As far as 16 year olds voting I can see it now. Liberal High School teachers would require they vote by absentee ballot to be filled out in class and left for grading by the faculty in order to pass for the next grade. Of course the teacher would correct any “errors” and then make sure the forms are filed. Don’t laugh, I would not be surprised if it happened.


38 posted on 09/19/2014 3:15:50 PM PDT by TonyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hadaclueonce

AGREE!


39 posted on 09/19/2014 3:17:03 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

The voting age should be raised to 40. By then, you’ve had some life experiences, ups and downs, have learned responsibility and maybe, just maybe, understand that voting for the cute candidate isn’t going to cut it.


40 posted on 09/19/2014 3:17:28 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson