Posted on 10/09/2014 5:46:27 PM PDT by Morgana
Pedophilia, in the sense of the persistent sexual attraction to children, is a disorder, not a crime, and deserves special protections in law. Thats the premise of a recent New York Times opinion piece by Rutgers law professor Margo Kaplan, who argues that stigma surrounding adults who are sexually attracted to children prevents them from seeking psychological help.
As a result, Kaplan asserts, pedophiles should be protected by the same anti-discrimination laws that require society to accommodate other disabilities.
By some estimates, 1 percent of the male population continues, long after puberty, to find themselves attracted to prepubescent children. These people are living with pedophilia, a sexual attraction to prepubescents that often constitutes a mental illness, Kaplan wrote. Unfortunately, our laws are failing them and, consequently, ignoring opportunities to prevent child abuse.
According to Kaplan, pedophilia should be covered under the Americans With Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act, which, she says prohibit discrimination against otherwise qualified individuals with mental disabilities, in areas such as employment, education and medical care.
Congress, however, explicitly excluded pedophilia from protection under these two crucial laws.
Its time to revisit these categorical exclusions, Kaplan asserted. Without legal protection, a pedophile cannot risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support. He could lose his job, and future job prospects, if he is seen at a group-therapy session, asks for a reasonable accommodation to take medication or see a psychiatrist, or requests a limit in his interaction with children. Isolating individuals from appropriate employment and treatment only increases their risk of committing a crime.
Kaplan says the idea that pedophiles choose to think of children in a sexual way is a misconception. As evidence, she points to a group called Virtuous Pedophiles, an online forum where men who struggle with attraction to children support each other in their efforts to resist the temptation to abuse.
Kaplan also pointed to research performed on convicted child molesters showing differences in brain structure between healthy men and pedophiles.
Recent research, while often limited to sex offenders because of the stigma of pedophilia suggests that the disorder may have neurological origins, Kaplan wrote. Pedophilia could result from a failure in the brain to identify which environmental stimuli should provoke a sexual response. M.R.I.s of sex offenders with pedophilia show fewer of the neural pathways known as white matter in their brains. Men with pedophilia are three times more likely to be left-handed or ambidextrous, a finding that strongly suggests a neurological cause.
Keith Ablow, a prominent psychiatrist and frequent Fox News contributor, agrees with Kaplan that pedophilia is a disorder. But in a written response to Kaplans piece, Ablow strongly objected to the notion that the stigma surrounding the disorder should be removed.
Well-focused shame still has a place, even in the halls of law and medicine, Ablow argued. The need to hide impulses, like the impulse to rape children and feeling guilty about it, and taking it upon oneself to control the impulse or go to jail for giving into it, can be part of a reasoned legal and public health strategy to prevent it. Being shunned should be a decent heads-up that it's time to get help and stay away from temptation or else.
Kaplan is right that pedophilia is a disorder, adds Ablow, explaining that he has found that people who are attracted to children were often sexually abused. But Kaplan is wrong to suggest that, merely because something is a known disorder, it should result in protections under the law.
Pedophiles are no more worthy of protections as disabled Americans than those with other abnormal sexual desires called paraphilias which include the desire, for instance, to rape adult women or have sex with animals. Can you imagine a culture in which men can declare that their unwieldy desires to rape women merit them not the women being escorted to their vehicles in darkened parking lots after working the late shift?
A movement to normalize pedophilia has been gaining steam in recent years, with advocates of pedophilia arguing that their orientation is no different than other misunderstood sexual orientations.
If Congress does take up the issue of pedophilia with regard to the ADA, it wont be the first time a law has been discussed that could offer special legal protections for pedophiles. The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which was passed by the Senate in last November, would bar employers from discriminating based on sexual orientation.
At the time ENDA passed, the American Psychological Association had just defined pedophilia as a sexual orientation in their newly-released DSM-V, the handbook for diagnosing mental illness. The APA has since apologized, calling the classification an error and promising to update the online and future print editions of the manual defining pedophilia as a sexual interest, not an orientation. In the meantime, current print editions of the manual still define pedophilia as a sexual orientation.
What was it that gay marriage proponents said? That gay marriage was not a slippery slope that would lead to bestiality, polygamy and pedophilia? I knew they were wrong but I didn’t think the Libs would take up pedophilia as their cause célèbre this quickly.
Margo sounds as though he/she might have a few screws loose.
There is one sure way to cure this disability.
Oldplayer
Next up on the liberal agenda is pedophilia acceptance.
An uncontrollable compulsion to murder journalists may well be a mental disability. Which is to say that it is an essential right and should be protected in law.
Next stop: ‘Marriage’ between adults and children.
Next up will be rapists with a ‘mental disability’ .....
It is a crime if it is acted upon.
No ! It is a mental illness
Just as sharia (pedophilia) is a mental illness
Pyromania is a criminal offense, with psycho-sexual overtones
The title is suggesting that a pyromaniaic is mentally disabled,
I believe that a pyromaniac is mentally ill, or we will have to rewrite the criminal procedure laws.
You know, by that logic murderers have to be suffering from a mental disorder. Therefore murderers should not be discriminated against in society, but they should be a protected class instead! Sick!
I heard a lengthy interview of her on the radio today.
A lot this article is taken out of context.
She doesn’t favor protecting child abusers in any manner.
She did come across as a typical lawyer.
So was homosexuality, until it wasn't.
Guess the wrighter doesn’t care about the rights of children. What am I saying? Of course she does not. The libs murder them by the millions.
This should be the cry of decent people everywhere “Save the children! Hang all pedophiles.” There simply cannot be any right to the life or body of another human being. This is why civilization is dying all around us.
sure the liberals have already pretty much forced gay marriage on the country, time to move on to the next “civil right” breakthrough.
well I’m sure the drooling slack-jawed knuckle-draggers at media matters will all be chirping “yep, yep, she’s right...”
Sure...and treated with a f@-&$ing rope.
Or treated in Oklahoma with one of our nice new death chambers as described in a thread above.
Oldplayer
Same psycho babble used to justify homosexuality.
You can’t fire anybody because of a wheelchair
or because of a pedophilic history...
especially not from an elementary school.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.