To: LibWhacker
So is there a parallel world in which I understand this stuff?
(Nope.)
To: LibWhacker
It's obvious these theorists read comic books when they were growing up.
3 posted on
10/25/2014 2:48:50 AM PDT by
Bratch
To: LibWhacker
Excuse me a moment while I feed the cat ....
(or bury it ;)
8 posted on
10/25/2014 5:13:15 AM PDT by
mikrofon
("Schrodie")
To: LibWhacker
They calculate, for instance, how 41 interacting worlds could give rise to the quantum interference seen in the famous double-slit experiment, which demonstrated that light could behave as either a wave or a particle.Wow. Just about as far away from Occam's razor as you could possibly get. And by the way, the 41 worlds always just happen to be colliding at the right angle and right time whenever we run the double-slit? Because the results are always the same.
To: LibWhacker
The Many Worlds Interpretation has been around for many years. At least in this world :-)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson