Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/25/2014 2:08:48 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LibWhacker

So is there a parallel world in which I understand this stuff?

(Nope.)


2 posted on 10/25/2014 2:38:39 AM PDT by PastorBooks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
It's obvious these theorists read comic books when they were growing up.



3 posted on 10/25/2014 2:48:50 AM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Excuse me a moment while I feed the cat ....

(or bury it ;)


8 posted on 10/25/2014 5:13:15 AM PDT by mikrofon ("Schrodie")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
They calculate, for instance, how 41 interacting worlds could give rise to the quantum interference seen in the famous double-slit experiment, which demonstrated that light could behave as either a wave or a particle.

Wow. Just about as far away from Occam's razor as you could possibly get. And by the way, the 41 worlds always just happen to be colliding at the right angle and right time whenever we run the double-slit? Because the results are always the same.

14 posted on 10/25/2014 10:03:55 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

The Many Worlds Interpretation has been around for many years. At least in this world :-)


16 posted on 10/25/2014 1:19:46 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Blog: www.BackwoodsEngineer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson