Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Having sex with 21 women saves you from prostate cancer
helpmeoutdoc.com ^ | 28 October 2014 | Daniel Tomas on

Posted on 10/28/2014 12:58:36 PM PDT by BenLurkin

Having an impressive love-making record may protect you against prostate cancer, as new evidence from Canadian scientists suggests.

According to new research published by the University of Montreal, men having sex with more than 20 women, have a 29% lower chance of developing prostate cancer, as opposed to men who have gone through 20 similar sexual experiences with other men.

(Excerpt) Read more at helpmeoutdoc.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: buddypalmerworks; cancer; prostate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-169 next last
To: CivilWarBrewing; All
as opposed to men who have gone through 20 similar sexual experiences with other men.

That's a pretty low pathogen/negative behavior hurdle to beat...

101 posted on 10/28/2014 1:52:38 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
men having sex with more than 20 women, . . . as opposed to men who have gone through 20 similar sexual experiences with other men.

Those are the only two options?

102 posted on 10/28/2014 1:54:09 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Doctrine doesn't change. The trick is to find a way around it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Dunno. It seems to state that hetero-sex is healthier than homo-sex. If they were trying to make a propaganda piece seems they would have concluded just the opposite. Or did I read this wrong?


103 posted on 10/28/2014 1:58:35 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Brother Cracker

That pic reminded me of “Slapshot”...

“Oglethorpe ——— the last girl in the pinwheel of the IceStravaganza.”


104 posted on 10/28/2014 1:59:11 PM PDT by dfwgator (The "Fire Muschamp" tagline is back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

http://www.johnspeedie.com/healy/20000.wav


105 posted on 10/28/2014 1:59:23 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-10/uom-pcr102714.php


106 posted on 10/28/2014 2:03:55 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brother Cracker

I dunno....that’s a lot of blades to dodge.....


107 posted on 10/28/2014 2:04:10 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana; BenLurkin
>> would that work if a man had sex with his own wife 21 times ? <<

Maybe not, because of the "excitement" factor -- something that might influence the amount of seminal fluid ejaculated by the prostate.

Just a theory, however. Not speaking from any personal experience!

108 posted on 10/28/2014 2:09:38 PM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

They are trying to normalize homos. “The new normal.”


109 posted on 10/28/2014 2:15:17 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Any energy source that requires a subsidy is, by definition, "unsustainable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I suspect the original message — sex with women over 21 will get you into less trouble — somehow got terribly garbled in transmission.


110 posted on 10/28/2014 2:16:16 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
as opposed to men who have gone through 20 similar sexual experiences with other men.

What?

111 posted on 10/28/2014 2:18:54 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It seems to be a rather homophobic study, wouldn’t you say? You’re good if you’ve had sex w/21 woman, but doomed if you’ve had sex w/20 men? Who would have ever imagined that a man’s having multiple same-sex partners could be dangerous ? (21 women can’t be too healthy, either)


112 posted on 10/28/2014 2:20:54 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
“...Eighty-eight lines about forty-four women.”
113 posted on 10/28/2014 2:22:18 PM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

PROSTATE EBOLA


114 posted on 10/28/2014 2:22:49 PM PDT by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I cannot imagine homosexual sex is all that good for the prostate of the, uh, catcher. That might have skewed the numbers.


115 posted on 10/28/2014 2:23:13 PM PDT by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn

Normal ejaculation produces about 3 – 5 cc (teaspoon) of semen.. The sperm makes up less than 1% of this volume with the seminal vesicles and the prostate producing the remainder of the volume. The prostate, which is made up of thousands of fluid-producing glands, itself secretes 25 – 35% of the total fluid volume. It is during high arousal in particular, that the prostate secretes this fluid. If extended arousal is not followed by ejaculation, the prostate can become tender and somewhat sore. This condition seems to account for what some call “blue balls”.


116 posted on 10/28/2014 2:27:19 PM PDT by Brother Cracker (You are more likely to find krugerrands in a Cracker Jack box than 22 ammo at Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheBorder

I don’t think the prostate is near any orifices used by sodomites.


117 posted on 10/28/2014 2:33:16 PM PDT by Tax-chick (I am not tense. I am very, very alert.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Well when they biopsy your prostate, the probes go in thru your rectum. So maybe they are?


118 posted on 10/28/2014 2:35:55 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Heh, shows what I know about anatomy.


119 posted on 10/28/2014 2:39:06 PM PDT by Tax-chick (I am not tense. I am very, very alert.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

It only hurts for a day or so....


120 posted on 10/28/2014 2:40:35 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson