Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virgin Galactic Crash Probe Focuses on Possible Structural Failure
wsj.com ^ | Nov. 2, 2014 9:04 p.m. ET | Andy Pasztor

Posted on 11/02/2014 8:18:07 PM PST by BenLurkin

Early analysis suggests that a violent structural failure rather than an engine explosion may have caused the crash of Virgin Galactic LLC’s experimental rocket ship Friday, according to safety experts and one person familiar with details of the investigation.

The National Transportation Safety Board’s probe of the accident is just beginning and it could change direction, these people said. But based on video footage and preliminary data analysis, they said, investigators are focusing on aerodynamic forces that could have caused the dramatic in-flight rupture of the craft, which killed one pilot and seriously injured the other. Because some engine malfunctions can sharply increase structural loads, it is too early to rule anything out, they said.

...

SpaceShip Two’s fuel tanks and engine were recovered largely intact. The hybrid motor fueled by nitrous oxide and a plastic-based compound were found some 5 miles from where large sections of the tail first hit the ground. Sections of the fuselage, fuel tanks and cockpit were located some distance from the engine itself.

The condition and location of various pieces of the wreckage suggest there was no propulsion-system explosion before the craft starting coming apart miles above California’s Mojave Desert, according to air-safety experts who have reviewed the images.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Travel
KEYWORDS: richardbranson; spaceship2; spaceshiptwo; virgin; virgingalactic; virgingasplatic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Interesting.

Always worried that one of those "flutter down" wings would malfunction during a reentry. Never thought it would be during a climb.

1 posted on 11/02/2014 8:18:07 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


2 posted on 11/02/2014 8:21:28 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I am not totally sold on plastic airplanes


3 posted on 11/02/2014 8:28:59 PM PST by al baby (Hi MomÂ…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

the idea here is,
as cheap as possible


4 posted on 11/02/2014 8:32:42 PM PST by RockyTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RockyTx

Branson’s a Socialist. Makes total sense.


5 posted on 11/02/2014 8:36:16 PM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I’m wondering how many spacecraft experts the NTSB has on-staff.

Seriously, I suppose they will have to learn - but wouldn’t NASA be of more help here?


6 posted on 11/02/2014 8:43:12 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

“Branson’s a Socialist. Makes total sense.”

Branson probably is, but that has nothing to do with the material used in the aircraft. That’s a remainder from Burt Rutan, who has a near fetish for composites. And I’m not saying they can’t be used, but facts are facts. We’ve been building aircraft out of metal for almost 90 years, and we know all of its strengths and limitations. Composites are relatively new, and still have lots of unknowns.


7 posted on 11/02/2014 8:46:43 PM PST by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I was wondering when they would give up on the original propellant that they were using for this rocket. It never was powerful enough to be anything other than for joy rides. If it was a structural issue, maybe the new propellant had too much force for the airframe. But the designers of this system are certainly among the best aircraft designers who ever lived, and it’s hard to believe that they wouldn’t have taken that into account.


8 posted on 11/02/2014 8:48:20 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The hybrid motor fueled by nitrous oxide and a plastic-based compound were found some 5 miles from where large sections of the tail first hit the ground. Sections of the fuselage, fuel tanks and cockpit were located some distance from the engine itself.

5 miles in which direction? - up range or down range?

9 posted on 11/02/2014 8:50:13 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

It was initially but the project was handed off from Scaled Composites to a subsidiary of Virgin in 2012. So now I don’t now.


10 posted on 11/02/2014 8:55:46 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


11 posted on 11/02/2014 8:56:37 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Can you explain why that matters? I am interested in your opinion.


12 posted on 11/02/2014 8:56:56 PM PST by superfries
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: superfries

It sort of sounds like one or both of the tail sections broke off first and the engines and fuselage kept going for awhile. Initially they talked like the engine might have blown, but it sounds like the engine and fuel tank were pretty much intact. So maybe the tail broke off and they lost control, or the thrust of the engines was too much for the fuselage and something else happened. I suppose they’ll figure it out eventually.


13 posted on 11/02/2014 9:35:04 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

My guess...and I said this on the original thread I posted Friday...is that the engine might have “hiccuped.” It ignited but there was a disrupting in supply, maybe a temporary “clog.” It restarted but the force was too much for the air frame, it failed and the flutter down wings were torn off.

There weren’t any visible burn or explosion marks on the pieces on the desert floor.


14 posted on 11/02/2014 9:36:47 PM PST by prisoner6 (Stop the Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: superfries

System to help Virgin spaceship descend deployed early - NTSB

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/system-help-virgin-spaceship-descend-deployed-early-ntsb-050237211.html#TczrARW


15 posted on 11/02/2014 9:46:50 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

so much for the feathering idea ...


16 posted on 11/02/2014 9:49:20 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name

Airbus 350 XWB.


17 posted on 11/02/2014 9:50:30 PM PST by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ozark Tom

I don’t know about the 350, but the 787 which is considered a composite aircraft is still 50% metal.


18 posted on 11/02/2014 10:02:21 PM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

There should be some sort of mechanism to prevent that from happening.


19 posted on 11/02/2014 10:06:25 PM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The TMRO show did an interview with a couple of guys who were there on the ground during the Virgin Galactic test flight.

We are joined by Doug Messier of ParabolicArc.com and photographer Ken Brown (AP Photo’s) who were in Mojave watching SpaceShipTwo’s flight. A day before the SpaceShipTwo accident Doug wrote an amazing article about why Scaled Composites and the SpaceShipTwo engine:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpno4_o65fQ&list=UU2s0KlNEQSDfXGVPIPidxpw


20 posted on 11/02/2014 10:07:57 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson