Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bunster

****labeled a fake and now determined to be Real and worth 500 Thousand pounds (as opposed to a couple of pounds) to the British family.***

Which proves it is not the QUALITY of the art but WHO DID IT.

Reminds me of the man who wanted to sell an unsigned de Kooning painting worth thousands to finance his son’s education. When it was found to be a fake it went from being valued at tens of thousands to to the value of only the paint and canvas.


37 posted on 11/11/2014 9:17:58 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Thanks for the point of contemplation.

The value of used paint and canvas.

It’s the assigned name and acceptance of the name establishing the market price at a point in time.

Maybe Jackson Pollack was a canny guy after all.

Hocus pocus, dribble paint
Obfuscate
Ka-ching


58 posted on 11/11/2014 10:45:26 AM PST by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson