Posted on 12/14/2014 12:18:44 PM PST by rightistight
BuzzFeed, continuing its assault on journalistic integrity after publishing a rambling, conspiracy-filled article by Lena Dunham, is now suggesting gifts that “feminists” will love.
In an article called “19 Amazing Gifts Every Feminist Will Absolutely Love,” BuzzFeed suggested numerous gifts for “feminists,” which it apparently misconstrued to mean “women who hate men.”
Instead of pushing for equality, the gifts suggest hurting men, committing crimes, or generic pop-culture references.
Here are some of the worst:
(Excerpt) Read more at thepunditpress.com ...
*Hawking. Not to be pedantic, but that’s way off. Unless they meant to say they were putting the items in hock (pawn)?
SOCIAL STRUCTURES
Men’s position in society
Before we do anything, the very first measure to adopt is to take all men out of all positions of decision-making immediately, and actually out of any kind of social, professional position whatsoever.
Major serial killers, serial torturers, pimps, pornographers, severe domestic abusers, serial rapists, genocide planners, biocide planners and pedocriminals across the world will simply be euthanised: the decisions will be taken by women in a mass world tribunal for patriarchal crimes. This is by far the best solution, and is the most legitimate, ethical way of reducing male population to more reasonable levels. Such men would otherwise forever pose a threat to women, children, animals, the earth and society as a whole, and we know they have no chance of ceasing their violent behaviour after having reached such an advanced stage of sadism and sociopathy. It would be reckless to spend space, resources and energy in keeping them alive in prisons.
All of men’s (alive and euthanised) belongings, property, resources and land will be confiscated from men and handed back to female care and supervision – property rights over land will be abolished. You can’t own land!
All men at least above 15 (or younger if very asocial) should live separately from women and children, on their own in small huts or studios, isolated from one another and scattered around so that women can keep an eye on them (they should never be in groups or packs, that would be illegal). So it would also be illegal for male adults to impose their presence on females, girls and children. Men would have to care for themselves on their own: food, laundry, etc. No male above his age of puberty would be allowed to receive any kind of service from a female. Their life expectancy would probably drop to the age of 40, but that’s how things should be. Women’s life expectancy without men would rise to 130 years at least.
https://witchwind.wordpress.com/2014/10/07/utopia-what-would-a-womens-society-look-like/
The SCUM Manifesto consists of an introduction, a list of grievances, and a conclusion.[20] The manifesto opens with the following declaration:[33]
“Life” in this “society” being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of “society” being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation and eliminate the male sex.
Solanas begins by presenting a theory of the male as an “incomplete female” who is genetically deficient due to the Y chromosome.[34] According to Solanas, this genetic deficiency causes the male to be emotionally limited, egocentric, and incapable of mental passion or genuine interaction. She describes the male as lacking empathy and unable to relate to anything apart from his own physical sensations.[35] The manifesto continues by arguing that the male spends his life attempting to become female, and thereby overcome his inferiority. He does this by “constantly seeking out, fraternizing with and trying to live though and fuse with the female.” Solanas rejects Freud’s theory of penis envy, and argues that men have “pussy envy”. Solanas then accuses men of turning the world into a “shitpile” and presents a long list of grievances.[36]
The bulk of the manifesto consists of a litany of grievances against the male sex. The grievances are divided into the following sections:[37]
War
Niceness, Politeness and “Dignity”
Money, Marriage and Prostitution, Work and Prevention of an Automated Society
Fatherhood and Mental Illness (fear, cowardice, timidity, humility, insecurity, passivity)
Suppression of Individuality, Animalism (domesticity and motherhood) and Functionalism
Prevention of Privacy
Isolation, Suburbs and Prevention of Community
Conformity
Authority and Government
Philosophy, Religion and Morality Based on Sex
Prejudice (racial, ethnic, religious, etc.)
Competition, Prestige, Status, Formal Education, Ignorance and Social and Economic Classes
Prevention of Conversation
Prevention of Friendship and Love
“Great Art” and “Culture”
Sexuality
Boredom
Secrecy, Censorship, Suppression of Knowledge and Ideas, and Exposés
Distrust
Ugliness
Hate and Violence
Disease and Death
Due to the aforementioned grievances, the manifesto concludes that the elimination of the male sex is a moral imperative.[38] It also argues that women must replace the “money-work system” with a system of complete automation, as this will lead to the collapse of the government and the loss of men’s power over women.[39]
In order to accomplish these goals, the manifesto proposes that a revolutionary vanguard of women be formed. This vanguard is referred to as SCUM. The manifesto argues that SCUM should employ sabotage and direct action tactics rather than civil disobedience, as civil disobedience is only useful for making small changes to society. In order to destroy the system, violent action is necessary: “If SCUM ever marches, it will be over the President’s stupid, sickening face; if SCUM ever strikes, it will be in the dark with a six-inch blade.”[40]
The manifesto ends by describ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCUM_Manifesto
Meet a 22-year-old, southern criminology student with a three-year-old child. She calls herself the Femitheist and has a blog, YouTube channel, and is writing a book all about the “importance” of reducing the male population to roughly 1-10% in order to achieve world peace and “true equality.”
Somehow, she expects this to end war, rape, and violence in general. Though this seems like trying to end violence by committing violence – because it is – she asserts that it is “the only logical solution.” Everything she proposes to do for, to, and against men (and women) directly violates the Non-Aggression Principle (NAP).
Terrifyingly, she has spawned a gaggle of followers that believe in selective breeding, male-only abortions, and an International Castration Day. She asserts that men of all ages would need to attend a castration ceremony, and murdered if they refuse. Don’t worry, though, the men’s spouses and mothers have the option to “milk the male” before castration if they want a sperm sample.
And to think that these bitches still rely on MEN to change their flat tires.
Hocking.
The feminazis are becoming cruel parodies of themselves. Only the most ugly would wear this crapola
“*Hawking. Not to be pedantic, but that’s way off. Unless they meant to say they were putting the items in hock (pawn)?”
You might want to consult a dictionary before posting something as ignorant as that again.
Read post #12.
Sheesh! This turd brained little nitwit needs to check with my wife to see how much "POWER" I have over her. These girly whirlies are completely off the deep end.
So much hate, it’s no wonder they can’t get off.
Tehehe! I can't wait until they try to spring this one on your average Islamist head hacker. "Hey mister seventh century barbarian, would you mind terribly if we ask you to come in quietly and have your testicles removed?" BWAHAHAHAHA!
You might want to consult a dictionary before posting something as ignorant as that again.Why would I need to consult a dictionary when I know I'm correct? You should ask a fifth grader to help you with reading comprehension to avoid looking like a high-functioning retard.
Pull up most any standard English dictionary and tell us all the definitions for "Hock" and "Hawk". Since you've already demonstrated you are somewhat developmentally disabled, take your time. We'll wait until you figure it out. Here, I'll even get you started: www.merriam-webster.com
She’s never going to find a husband with that attitude.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.