Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I have no problem with their being punished for breaking the law.

Just commenting on the claims that they caused immense damage. Which I have seen no evidence of. And which seems very unlikely.

I once camped overnight under an arch in Canyonlands National Park. Waay in the backcountry. It was a violation of park rule. But very cool.

Did I break the rule, and if caught could I have been fined? You bet.

Did I damage the arch? Don’t be silly. Nobody could even tell I’d been there at all.


16 posted on 12/16/2014 7:55:24 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

The hummingbird is just depressions in the earth. I can see where walking around it and creating new depressions could be very damaging. This ain’t a stone arch. It’s depressions in the soil.


18 posted on 12/16/2014 7:57:04 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Any energy source that requires a subsidy is, by definition, "unsustainable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan

They could have gone anywhere, and they chose to be right on top of the artifact. A couple of hundred yards away would have made no difference to their mission.


19 posted on 12/16/2014 7:58:43 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Any energy source that requires a subsidy is, by definition, "unsustainable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson