Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin on Potential Romney ’16 Run: ‘We Need New Blood’ ... (Hello Sarah, this means you)
breitbart.com ^ | by Tony Lee15 Jan 2015 | by Tony Lee

Posted on 01/18/2015 5:04:15 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network

Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin wants failed presidential candidate Mitt Romney to get off the stage as Romney, the career candidate, seriously considers a third run White House run.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: backstabberromney; loserromney; palin; palinistas; rinoromney; sarahpalin; spoilerromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Ted Cruz supports unchecked legal immigration (HB-1 visas and green cards) and supports the same "pathway to citizenship" as does Marco Rubio.

Ted Cruz would have served less time as Senator as Palin was a Governor. Palin resigned from office due to frivolous lawsuits filed by her enemies and to prevent both her and her state from being financially ruined.

Yet, Palin is looked down upon as a "quitter," but Cruz is being hailed as the 2nd coming even though he's just got elected in 2012.

Cruz needs to stay in the Senate and finish out his term that Texas voters elected him to.

41 posted on 01/18/2015 7:44:01 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (GO PACK GO! GO PACK GO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Manufacturing jobs are going the way of the horse and buggy. Soon it will entirely be done with robots. In fact, that process is already accelerating. Robotics, not manufacturing, will be one of the drivers of the 21st century economy. Along with biotechnology, virtual reality, 3D printing to name a few more.

At the turn of the 20th century, many people were lamenting the fact that we were transitioning from an agricultural based economy to an industrial/manufacturing economy. All in all, things turned out well for us and our standard of living is far superior today. In fact, Americans living below the poverty line today have lifestyles more luxurious than the aristocrats of 100 years ago could even dream about.

Life expectancy 100 years ago was roughly 48 years. People who reached their 50s, unless they were independently wealthy, were expected to die and stop being a burden on their children. These days, you have people actually making career changes in their 50s and being productive citizens well into their 70s.

As we move away from the Industrial Age, I have much optimism for the future. Some are calling it the Information Age but I think it will be far more than that. Soon it will be possible to grow organs and extend human lifespans to over 200 years. The average person will not have to perform any menial tasks at all as they will all be done by robots (we will probably call them something else as "robots" sounds too much like bad 20th century science fiction).

42 posted on 01/18/2015 7:50:44 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

Yes, that is what I meant. The more RINOS the merrier. Split those dollars and that vote.


43 posted on 01/18/2015 7:56:40 AM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

I agree. No to fatso, mittens, or jebbush. If any one of those frauds get the GOP nomination, it will prove that we have a uni-party of Dem/GOP elitist dictators unresponsive to the people.
In that event, it will be necessary to run a 3rd party candidate as a means of wrecking the GOP elite.


44 posted on 01/18/2015 8:00:50 AM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats & GOPe delenda est. President zero gave us patient zero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Well I don’t argue with your fact.

However China is where the jobs have gone. America has lost millions of jobs, and they are all now being done in the world’s largest communist nation, and that nation is rapidly growing as a result of America’s throwing off all those jobs.

China is now a larger export engine, than America is.

China is a massive, closed nation. They do not allow Americans to immigrate. Unless the Americans are of Chinese heritage.

In effect, it is a massive race-based nation, without elections.

I strongly believe a segment of the GOP has sold out to communist China.

Sold out.

Nobody is yet complaining, but we are now 18 trillion in debt, and we don’t made stuff in America anymore.

China is in charge. Rapidly growing, and we are not only not doing a thing to compete, we are helping China to compete against us.

China.

I don’t blame China. At least not completely. I blame Americans who have sold out every single thing which was American, to China, for a percentage of the gross.

There has been a MASSIVE sell-out, done by both parties, and it continues to this very moment.

It is in fact getting worse.

America now has nearly 100,000,000 people out of work.

Bring back American jobs.

Make stuff, right here once again.


45 posted on 01/18/2015 8:11:22 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Sarah Palin has no chance of securing the GOP nomination for president. She has no money to do so. All of the PAC’s she associated with are open to anyone to see what kind of money they have on hand, since financial disclosure of a PAC’s assets are required by law. When you look at those it’s plain to see there is no way she can afford a presidential run in this day and age. We’re living in the days of presidential campaigns costing hundreds of millions of dollars. You do not raise that in 5 to 10 dollar increments from her devout followers. You simply have to have large dollar donors acting on your behalf to underwrite the fixed, continuous expenses of a campaign - staff, office space and attendant utility & operating costs, travel, venues for your public appearances - and multiply that by 50 states. It’s staggering. The fact is Palin has nowhere near that kind of money, nor any access to it since she’s not courting those who can help her financially. Needless to say, those who donate to the RNC overall - such as the Gas Chamber of Commerce - will make absolutely sure she has no path into the GOP nomination. They’d pull every dime of funding to the RNC if Preibus ever thought of working with her to secure the nomination for herself.

So any thought of a presidential run by her is no more than Pie in the Sky daydreaming. The facts on the ground are clear enough - she’s too broke to mount any sort of campaign required to win. It’s no more complicated than that.


46 posted on 01/18/2015 8:18:03 AM PST by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

If you’re going to take every anti-GOPe remark Palin makes as a sign that she’s running, you’re going to be disappointed.


47 posted on 01/18/2015 8:28:58 AM PST by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

If the left is SERIOUSLY opposed to Sarah Palin running,then logic says this would be the way to go. The key thing here is whether or not they are truly opposed,or if it is a feint.


48 posted on 01/18/2015 8:30:04 AM PST by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Sarah would make a good Secretary of Energy.

She knows how to take on the Oil Companies and still promote Energy Production efforts like Keystone XL.


49 posted on 01/18/2015 8:30:59 AM PST by G Larry (Daesh - Obama's future dream for his friends in the Muslim Brotherhood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antonico

Actually I believe Sarah has somewhere around 12 million or so.

Almost exactly what Obama, now has.

She can indeed, afford to run for President.


50 posted on 01/18/2015 8:34:21 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

Don’t read Breitbart articles as much as I’d like to... site seizes up my laptop.

(((
Oh, boy, do I know what you mean. It’s a mess there.

The lack of annoying ads, pop-ups, etc., here at FR is just great. Going to sites like “Breitbart” is a wonderful reminder for our need to financially support FR.


51 posted on 01/18/2015 8:59:12 AM PST by Bigg Red (Congress, do your duty and repo his pen and his phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Ted Cruz....supports the same "pathway to citizenship" as does Marco Rubio.

Ted Cruz Files Immigration Amendment To Ban Path To Citizenship

52 posted on 01/18/2015 9:21:56 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
Notice Cruz's flip-flop a month later in 2013:

Sen Ted Cruz also supports temporary legalization status in the immigration bill

"Sen. Ted Cruz introduced an amendment to the current immigration bill back in May that would have removed the path to citizenship from the bill completely. But it also supported the same temporary legal status (RPI status) that is already in the bill that Sen. Marco Rubio has been discussing. And even more than that, it also supported permanent legal residency status as well.

No matter how you slice and dice it, it's still AMNESTY.

My biggest concern, is Cruz' support for unchecked legal immigration. Unchecked legal immigration is actually worse than illegal immigration down the road.

53 posted on 01/18/2015 9:43:09 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (GO PACK GO! GO PACK GO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: don-o
One thing is certain, she can keep a certain segment holding out hope in the face of the reality that she will NEVER garner the GOP nomination.

Never say "Never" but I think you are right unless there are drastic changes in the RNC. If she runs it will have to be third party and success via that road is unlikely. She knows that.

54 posted on 01/18/2015 9:57:39 AM PST by Chuckster (The longer I live the less I care about what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network; antonico

I don’t know how many PACs Palin may have but the SarahPAC has less than a million
on hand at the end of 2014. It spent some $200,000 on candidates that year.

https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/lookup2.php?strID=C00458588


55 posted on 01/18/2015 10:13:48 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Notice Cruz's flip-flop a month later in 2013:

You show no evidence of a flip flop.

You said that he was for a Pathway to Citizenship.

I showed you that he is against a Pathway to Citizenship.

56 posted on 01/18/2015 10:41:00 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd
"I will not vote for Romney. I will not vote for Christie. I will not vote for ANY Bush. The same goes for my wife."

How does your wife feel about you refusing to vote for her? :)

Triple LOL. Post of the day.

57 posted on 01/18/2015 2:06:54 PM PST by BlackVeil ('The past is never dead. It's not even past.' William Faulkner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: monocle

TX has write-ins only for a declared write-in candidate in a general election. No write-ins are allowed in a primary in TX. The establishment has circled the wagons around us, and we won’t be able to break out. “Jebbie, Here He Comes!”


58 posted on 01/18/2015 3:36:38 PM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Ping.


59 posted on 01/18/2015 4:25:14 PM PST by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
I agree with you 100 percent. The problem IMHO is that Americans are not willing to pay 50 cents more for tube socks in order to support the American worker. There is no feeling to sacrifice even a little to support the US economy. It's all me, me, me, in today's society.

In WWII people were willing to sacrifice in order to win the war. We need that feeling again to win the economic war we are losing with China.

The problem is that big business owns most politicians so that they will not vote against their corporate masters. The love of money has overcome the love of country.

60 posted on 01/18/2015 6:49:15 PM PST by Garfunkel Oates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson