Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: relictele
Memory occupied by the OS in that figure is a static measure and, moreover, is not necessarily a measure or predictor of performance vis-a-vis CPU, graphics, etc.

Why would memory usage be a predictor of any of those? The actual size of iOS 8 is about 1.1GB to 1.4GB depending on the device it is installed on. The rest of the memory consumption is Apple included Apps that are installed along with the operating system that make the device what it is. . . iOS is actually very parsimonious of space and very good at memory management. Far better than Android. iOS handles all of what requires 2 or 3GB of RAM in Android in only 1GB or 2GBs. The critics keep comparing RAM in the iPhone and iPad against the larger allotments in Android devices. . . but ignoring the greater efficiencies in the Apple devices that simply don't require the larger RAM allotments.

You want to compare performance? That's been done in the bench marks. Samsung and several of the other Android phone makers were caught TWEAKING their benchmark routines to cheat the numbers. Apple never has done that to get faster numbers. Right now, Apple's 64bit Dual Core A8 processor is blowing away the four core processors used in Android devices.

Here is one of the supposedly top Android phones for performance. . . and the geek bench marks:

Basemark II is the only benchmark in which this Android phone slightly exceeds the iPhone 6. . . and that's because it includes a battery test and this Android phone has a battery that is almost twice the capacity of the iPhone 6's. That, however, is not what we are talking about here, we are talking about speed and performance in graphics. . . and the iPhone's dual core exceeds the Motorola's FOUR cores in every test, most of the time by wide margins. Even in the multi-core test, the iPhone was marginally better with two cores, than the Android was with four.

104 posted on 01/23/2015 6:58:09 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker

We’re discussing different points.

I’m not comparing Apple performance to Samsung performance. Never did.

My comment was about Apple’s performance on the same hardware i.e. the exact same unit using various iterations of iOS.

My other comment was about functionality of some meat-and-potatoes apps that have been ‘fixed’ to the point of unusability.

I use(d) both platforms and respectfully decline to engage in the ritual sumo of Apple vs. Android. My only criteria, selfishly, is a) what works for me and b) what works, period. As before, it seems utter madness that existing problems aren’t fixed while new problems are introduced but if that is Apple’s stance I can take a hint as well as take my custom elsewhere.


105 posted on 01/23/2015 7:25:02 PM PST by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson