Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Panzerkampfwagen Tiger Was Germany’s ‘Over-Engineered’ Tank
Boldride ^ | March 8, 2015 | Bill Wilson

Posted on 03/09/2015 12:38:33 PM PDT by C19fan

The Germans are a polarizing people, and so are their products. Sort of like when journalists review a BMW — people either love ‘em or hate ‘em. This is because Germany’s engineering prowess is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it enables Volkswagen, BMW, Porsche, etc., to lead the pack when it comes to performance. On the other hand, the Germans are notorious for letting their reach exceed their grasp. They rush new and innovative products to market without giving them a proper shake-down first.

Not only does this odd duality explain Germany’s mixed record in building fine automobiles, it also sheds light on designs going as far back as World War II. Case in point: the Panzerkampfwagen Tiger battle tanks the Fatherland built to counter Allied armor. They were either deadly killers, clunky death traps, or both, depending on who you ask.

(Excerpt) Read more at autos.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: nazi; tank; tiger; treadhead; ww2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last
To: C19fan

There is only one Panzer Leader!

http://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/2639/panzer-leader


41 posted on 03/09/2015 1:38:37 PM PDT by Conan the Librarian (The Best in Life is to crush my enemies, see them driven before me, and the Dewey Decimal System)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molson209

Depends on whether it as a 88L or 88LL — caliber made the difference.

Hoss


42 posted on 03/09/2015 1:39:56 PM PDT by HossB86 (Christ, and Him alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
"He could never begin to compete with the industrial output. "

Amen. We would credit Rosie the Riveter with winning the war. [and the factories and know-how Roosevelt did not export with fair trade]. We could mass produce.

43 posted on 03/09/2015 1:40:02 PM PDT by ex-snook (God forgives because God is Love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RWB Patriot

“If the Nazis had focused on the Panther and the Panzer IV and their variants, the war would’ve gone a lot differently”

Would have gone exactly the same. War isn’t tank on tank dueling like knights. It is Bombers causing airbattles that brought up the Luftwaffe to be destroyed by Mustangs and Thunderbolts. Then those thunderbolts run wild because there isn’t a luftwaffe to protect them. And then our side can mass artillery and supplies anywhere we choose, and they cant run a donkey cart to market without getting attacked by jabos.
Ask any german,, the P-47 was their demise.

If the Germans could have quadrupled the number of panthers they made, that would have just been more P-47 and Tempest targets. The object lesson is the minute the weather broke over the Battle of the Bulge, the Germans instantly were helpless and cut to pieces from the air onslaught.
No fantasy tank could have saved them unless it had all aspect sidewinders mounted.


44 posted on 03/09/2015 1:43:31 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan
... Probably ... but ... Speer had more autonomy than his predecessors, and not just because he was one of Hitler's favorites, but also because they had largely failed. If Speer had come in earlier would he have been able to implement his own program from the start? We'll never really know the answer to that question.

Speer would certainly have pushed to conscript more of the French for labor, and -- if we can believe his own self-serving claims -- would have worked the Jews and Slavs as slave labor rather than killing them outright.

Both of those things would have made much more "sense" from a tyrannical productivity point of view. But would Hitler have agreed to them before it became clear that Germany's position was getting desperate? I'm not so sure.

And as for Speer's claim that he was unaware of the extermination programs? That I simply do not believe is even possible.

45 posted on 03/09/2015 1:44:20 PM PDT by FredZarguna (O, Reason not the need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Conan the Librarian

Hear, Hear!!!

:D

Hoss


46 posted on 03/09/2015 1:44:40 PM PDT by HossB86 (Christ, and Him alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Here’s one bad dude - The Russian T-34:

http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/russian-tank-t-34-world-war-ii-25091341.jpg


47 posted on 03/09/2015 1:44:47 PM PDT by donaldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Moltke

I agree.

Look how long it took BMW to totally redesign their “boxer” motorcycle engines.

The air-cooled “boxer” engine used essentially the same design (with myriad tweaks and improvements but no total design overhauls) from 1923 until the early 90s.

That’s not exactly “rushing” a new product to market.


48 posted on 03/09/2015 1:45:35 PM PDT by WayneS (Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
We might have accomplished the same thing

Wrecked railroads but intact vehicles. Bombing the railyards prior to DDay provided that tactical advantage of forcing road marches. By the mid 1944 many things had changed in the war. Leaving production unhindered wouldn't have helped the Eastern front which likely would have affected mid-1944 in a negative way for the Allies.

49 posted on 03/09/2015 1:46:26 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Cry if I Wanna

Ask the guy who spent $1,000 for a rear engine seal on the 911. Twice.


50 posted on 03/09/2015 1:46:29 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks ("If he were working for the other side, what would he be doing differently ?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

*


51 posted on 03/09/2015 1:47:08 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass ("Any girl can be glamorous. All you have to do is stand still and look stupid." Hedy Lamarr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook

Exactly correct about Rosie the riveter. The Germans made 1300 of the Tigers and less than 500 Tiger 2s. We built 50,000 Shermans, and the Russians built nearly 65,000 T-34s that were more than a match for anything the Germans fielded. Even Guderian said the T-34 was the best tank of all.


52 posted on 03/09/2015 1:51:15 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

I have my doubts about that. Russia attack Germany - with what? The Soviet army was in no shape for a long term offensive against the Germans in 1939.


53 posted on 03/09/2015 1:51:31 PM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44

Attack on Russia was in 1941. Until then, the Nazis and Soviets were allies.


54 posted on 03/09/2015 1:53:36 PM PDT by Rinnwald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44

I agree. That was Nazi party propaganda of that era,, not really based in fact. Stalin had done a number on his own military. They were in no shape to attack Germany then. And also the Germans were well aware that they were not about to be attacked. They had conducted -extensive- deep reconnaissance flights for months ahead of the invasion of the USSR.


55 posted on 03/09/2015 1:55:16 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
It has been an enduring mystery for me why Hitler stopped the attack on England and opened up a new front on Russia. It seems like a complete blunder, but if credible information exists that the Russians were planning to attack Germany, then it starts to make more sense.

One always has to remember that Germany had knocked Russia out of WWI in 1917, while the Western Front vs. France and England was a four year holocaust. After France collapsed like a house of cards in 1940, with the BEF barely escaping back across the moat, Hitler thought Russia would be relatively easy. If Germany could whip Russia in 1917 in an infantry campaign with its main forces pinned down in the West, panzers and blitzkrieg backed up by the main weight of the Wehrmacht should do the job a generation later. So he thought. But 1941 was not 1917. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

56 posted on 03/09/2015 1:56:25 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Rinnwald

Of course, not thinking properly.

But I stand by my statement that the Russian’s did not have the military to invade Germany in 1941. Can not imagine Stalin thinking doing so was such a great idea.


57 posted on 03/09/2015 1:56:41 PM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

In the bocage, we was assaulted by them Tigers ... and I mean "assaulted".

58 posted on 03/09/2015 1:56:49 PM PDT by BlueLancer (Pachelbel --- The original one-hit wonder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44
I have my doubts about that. Russia attack Germany - with what? The Soviet army was in no shape for a long term offensive against the Germans in 1939.

This guy I argue with is from Austria, and he claims that's what his father (A Doctor in the German Army) said, and that's what he was taught in his history classes.

I would go back and ask him for more detail, but I really don't like him. He's a foreign Pr*ck who's married to an American, now living in Austin Texas, and pushing his socialist mindset here in this country.

I've told him several times he needs to go back to Austria, because he certainly isn't wanted here.

59 posted on 03/09/2015 1:57:15 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44

Also, a year earlier, the Germans watched the difficulty the USSR had in taking on Finland. Nobody could seriously argue the Germany feared a Soviet invasion.
The only threat they could have ever posed there was in subversion and assisting any German communists in taking on the Nazis.

But the window for that was also realistically gone too.


60 posted on 03/09/2015 1:58:32 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson