Posted on 03/23/2015 7:35:33 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
Want to shoot prairie dogs at 800 yards at a semi-reasonable cost (reloading). 220 swift.
5.56? Great patrol round, i.e. you can carry a lot. But I don’t patrol. Works pretty well on people at typical engagement distances. LOTS of it around.
7.62 hollow points. I like mucho.
But I prefer AR ergonomics over AK ergonomics so I have more AR’s than AK’s.
The M1 is such a great rifle to shoot, and very accurate also.
300 WBY FTW
Dang I agree with everyone of them.
Would pick a 300WIN Mag over the 300 Weatherby MAG everyday
Agree if the Gov had not saturated the market with the 223 round it would have died. Ballistics for 223 are terrible.
270WSM....Why?
220 Swift is fun if you like to change barrels out.....22/250 will do the same job and is easier on the equipment...
I love the M-14 and 7.62. For standoff shooting, superb.
Close quarters, I liked my M-4. Short, maneuverable, carry an assload of ammo for it. I found it reliable.
Each has it’s benefit.
Also three tours.
If you can shoot 308 well, you can shoot anything. It’s a round that takes skill.
In his linked article about 5 most underrated cartridges he listed the 9.3mm. I shook my head on that one. Many fine 375 H&H Magnums that can easily be loaded down to 9.3 levels. There are many file (expensive) 375 H&Hs, but a CZ 550 American Magnum is affordable and shoots well.
I don't know why I took these out in the canoe!
You Fool! How could you recklessly expose those fine weapons to irretrievable loss like that? Sorry to hear of your tragedy
Tools for jobs. Who could take a ridiculously underpowered, ancient cartridge like the 30-30 seriously? Aside from everyone who's taken a deer with it, that is. The .35 Remington? The .257 Roberts? They happen to do the job they're designed for very well, thankyouverymuch. What else is there?
Neither has any real stopping power which is why Obama's attempts to ban it was a fu**ing joke.
7.62 is far, FAR superior.
Look at the robinson arms Xcr in 308. I love the one I have
Nice, but nothing for the second raghead in the room
My favorite deer hunting round. One behind the ears and down they go. No muss, no fuss and no tracking them.
I don’t even think you need zero recoil. A modern battlefield rifle needs that punch you like, be light enough to hump around, have a collapsing or folding stock for getting in and out of vehicles, some inherent accuracy and be able to withstand abuse. I have recently gotten to shoot an FN SCAR in 7.62 and like it a lot. I don’t know how it would do for a whole deployment to Afghanistan, but it is really pretty sweet. There is a lot of recoil compared to an M-4, but it is a real tack driver with a low power optic and ball ammo. Really nice with a suppressor.
Gotta agree on the 300 Weatherby magnum. The Winchester is quite good as they point out. The 44 magnum Ruger rifle is one powerful round, and similarly don’t want to shoot something you plan to eat, at close range with either one of these.
Ammo, yes. It’s so easy to just pack twenty full mags of those little beauties.
308— a fave.
Love the AR gas impingement or hate it, but a .308 scaled AR with adjustable gast block tuned to just enough gas to lock the bolt back on empty is a remarkably soft shooting rifle. Much softer than a M14.
Too bad the ammo weighs so much if you want to go to war with a decent load. Running with for-five loaded 20 round magazines will beat you to death. A 100 rounds of mouse ammo is nothing.
For those long shots over ravines, the hammer for the job would be a 338 Lapua or a 50 BMG in a Barrett. Only going by what I read in magazines.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.