Skip to comments.
California next? US Geological Survey warns risk of magnitude 8 or larger 'Big One' earthquake has
Dailymail.com ^
| 22:43 EST, 27 April 2015
| Mark Prigg For
Posted on 04/28/2015 10:09:40 AM PDT by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: BenLurkin
“Why is risk so risky.” —Seinfeld
21
posted on
04/28/2015 11:13:33 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: BenLurkin
“Thank you Roger for that report”
“And now to breaking news: It’s suspected the sun will come up again tomorrow ushering in the dawn of a new day...”
22
posted on
04/28/2015 11:50:38 AM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
Ha ha. It is sad that is so funny.
To: Snickering Hound
I have never bought a house that was not right on the fault line.
Just bought a new one ... on the line. Cue Johnny Cash!
24
posted on
04/28/2015 12:05:24 PM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(I Love Bull Markets!!!)
To: BenLurkin
25
posted on
04/28/2015 12:11:23 PM PDT
by
Cyman
(We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
To: Cyman
Oh good. Now there’s no need for me to prepare.
26
posted on
04/28/2015 12:12:33 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
Always glad to be of service.
27
posted on
04/28/2015 12:13:50 PM PDT
by
Cyman
(We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
To: Buckeye McFrog
Naw. Fracking. You got to keep up with the current boogeyman.
28
posted on
04/28/2015 12:55:33 PM PDT
by
SargeK
To: jsanders2001
As long as none of them escape inland.
29
posted on
04/28/2015 1:00:39 PM PDT
by
laplata
( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
To: grobdriver
Your cat - or dog - is more likely to predict one correctly.
30
posted on
04/28/2015 1:07:56 PM PDT
by
Churchillspirit
(9/11/2001 and 9/11/2012: NEVER FORGET.)
To: BenLurkin
The estimate for the likelihood that California will experience a magnitude 8 or larger earthquake in the next 30 years has increased from about 4.7% to about 7.0%, they say. Jumpin' Jehoshaphat!
The odds... Oooops... "likelihood" increased from around one in 20 to around one in 14.
Must be time to up the request for an increase in next year's budget.
Guess they forgot that other disciplines are very familiar with the very elastic nature of the definition of recurrence interval...
31
posted on
04/28/2015 9:13:11 PM PDT
by
publius911
(If you like Obamacare, You'll LOVE ObamaWeb.)
To: BenLurkin
The Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, or UCERF3, improves upon previous models by incorporating the latest data on the state's complex system of active geological faults, as well as new methods for translating these data into earthquake likelihoods.Sure look like US Geological Survey has borrowed the manual that the Climate Fraudsters invented.
Another computer model? Garbage in Garbage out?
Really?
I thought these folk were more engineers than delusional freaks like the fraudulent East Anglia "scientists."
The still unknown factors affecting earthquakes may be more complex and incompletely known than the arrogant climate fakers'.
32
posted on
04/28/2015 9:22:40 PM PDT
by
publius911
(If you like Obamacare, You'll LOVE ObamaWeb.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson