Posted on 07/06/2015 10:10:32 AM PDT by conservativejoy
Governor Scott Walker (R) is a Conservative hero with a record of taking progressives and unions in a state that went for Obama and beating them twice. He's cut government, taken away worker protections, supported government-mandated ultrasounds and empowered the private sector, making him the Republican insiders’ favorite for the 2016 GOP nomination.
His only problem is, his economic policies continue to fail — miserably.
The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia has ranked the Badger State 49th in its 50-state Leading Index report for April. With an index rank of -0.74 percent, Wisconsin was one of only five states to show contraction.
Experts do not read much into one month’s data. This index — which factors in average manufacturing hours, unemployment, wage trends and building permits — often shows a wide margin of error. The state has been especially rocked by the national decline in manufacturing.
However, Walker doesn’t really have any positive economic data to point to. Since he took office, his state has fallen from 11th to 44th in job creation. Wisconsin’s wages are also declining at twice the national level.
Walker’s new budget — which reads more like a campaign document than a plan to create jobs — offers a tax cut that mostly benefits the rich and sucks public funds into private ventures, in the form of school vouchers.
The governor is also rejecting Medicaid expansion and using the Affordable Care Act exchanges to kick 87,000 Wisconsinites off his state’s Badgercare program.
Meanwhile, his promise of creating 250,000 jobs looks less and less likely to happen.
Austerity seems to work about as well in America as it does in Greece. Maybe losing the recall was the best thing that could have happened for Wisconsin’s progressive movement. Walker’s job creation record is speaking volumes about attacking the institutions that helped create America’s middle class.
I’m looking for radical change before we devolve into CWII so I have to go with either Cruz or Trump. All the rest will be placeholders for the next Democrat.
At this point I’ll be surprised if we make it to Nov 2106 without kicking off CWII. This country is a powder keg and Obama is the match. And he’s totally off the Rez.
Secondly, if you actually look at what they were proposing, it isn't an evil thing. They were trying to all redacting of citizens names from correspondence and the inclusion of drafting ideas. The current law requires things like notes written on a napkin when brainstorming ideas be included in open records requests. The reason it got a backlash was the lefty media (and their willing accomplices, you included) misrepresenting what it was.
If Walker and the republican legislators follow their normal pattern they will spend the next six months selling why it is a good idea to the public and then passing it will little real opposition (well, it will be rabidly opposed by the libs, of course).
Thanks for the friendly exchange, even though we disagree on some things.
I do worry for the future - a full out CWII would be difficult. Cities vs suburbs/country?
The majority of the GOP legislators opposed this. This conceals all deliberations, email and communications from any public access and reverses over 100 years of open records law. Just looks really fishy right before Walker announces.
On the same day that Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker announced his run for president, the Wisconsin GOP has proposed a virtual gutting of Wisconsin's open records law, which has long been considered one of the best in the nation. The drastic changes were proposed in a last-minute, anonymous budget motion, with zero public input on the eve of a holiday weekend. The motion will be rolled into the state's massive budget bill and voted on in the coming weeks.
The unprecedented proposal would give lawmakers broad authority to hide the special interests who are working to influence legislation. It would keep legislative drafting files under wraps, create a new "deliberative materials" exemption that would exempt from disclosure records at all levels of government, and give the legislature an easy way to hide even more records from public view in the future.
The move to gut the open records law appears to come in direct response to a lawsuit that the Center for Media and Democracy filed against Governor Walker in May.
CMD was the first to reveal that Walker's office had struck the "search for truth" from the university's mission and eliminated the "Wisconsin Idea," and sued Walker after he withheld records pertaining to the changes, based on a claimed "deliberative process privilege." Although Walker's lawyers claim there already exists a deliberative privilege in Wisconsin law, that clearly is not true, because if it were, his allies in the legislature wouldn't have to add one through the budget process.
State Rep. Gordon Hintz, a Democrat from Oshkosh on the Joint Finance Committee, tweeted today that GOP budget leaders made it clear to the committee that Walker had signed off on the changes, including the changes to the open records law. The measure would help candidate Walker sidestep public scrutiny as national media outlets file records requests with his office. The Joint Finance Committee chairs, Sen. Alberta Darling (R) and Rep. John Nygren (R), have refused to say who asked for the changes.
Bill Lueders, president of the transparency watchdog Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council, called the proposal "cowardly" and a "shocking assault on the state’s long and proud tradition of open government." Ron Sklansky, a former 35-year senior staff attorney at the nonpartisan Wisconsin Legislative Counsel and an expert on open records, told CMD he had never seen a legislative proposal put forward that was as "devastating" to the open records law as this one. The measure is "almost a complete gutting of open records as it applies to the legislative and executive branch. It prevents the public from investigating the undue influence of special interests on the passage of legislation and the development of executive branch proposals and rule making," he said.
Although the proposal passed the Joint Finance Committee along party lines--with all Republicans voting in favor and all Democrats against--the move has prompted outrage across the political spectrum. The president of the right-wing MacIver Institute, Brett Healy, said the proposal "looks to be a huge step backwards for open government." Wisconsin's Republican Attorney General, Brad Schimel, said "Transparency is the cornerstone of democracy and the provisions in the Budget Bill limiting access to public records move Wisconsin in the wrong direction." Hours after Schimel weighed in, Walker spokesperson said vaguely that the governor would work with the legislature on the issue.
Critically, some legislators are saying they will not vote for the controversial budget with the changes included. "I will not support a budget that includes this assault on democracy," said Republican Sen. Robert Cowles, and other GOP legislators also expressed doubts.
The proposal would:
1) Create a new "deliberative materials" exemption
The amendments would exempt all "deliberative materials" from disclosure under the public records law, protecting anything that might have informed a policy decision.
"Deliberative materials" are broadly defined as “communications and other materials, including opinions, analyses, briefings, background information, recommendations, suggestions, drafts, correspondence about drafts, and notes, created or prepared in the process of reaching a decision concerning a policy or course of action.”
This measure could protect the disclosure of communications, draft legislation, or background materials from groups like the American Legislative Exchange Council, or "ALEC." It would allow legislators to hide their communications with lobbyists or campaign donors seeking policy favors. And it would allow the governor to hide how the executive budget was developed--including, for example, how, and why, a governor's office might have sought to alter the purpose of the university system.
2) Allow legislators to hide the identify of any person who communicates about the development of policy
This could allow lawmakers to hide the special interests who are working to influence legislation.
For example, CMD has filed an open records request with Joint Finance Chair Alberta Darling, who received thousands of dollars of contributions from Bill Minahan, whose company Building Committee Inc. received a $500,000 unsecured loan from the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation (WEDC), then promptly went bust leaving taxpayers to foot the bill.
The Wisconsin State Journal used the open records law to take a deep dive into this loan, documenting that it came shortly after Minahan gave Walker a $10,000 contribution and linking it to Walker’s chief of staff Keith Gilkes and second-in-command Mike Huebsch. Most recently, the State Journal discovered that Minahan loan had not gone through the underwriting required by law and many more loans failed to go through proper underwriting, putting millions of taxpayer dollars at risk.
WEDC has been the subject of two damning state audits which documented continued lawbreaking at Walker’s flagship jobs agency. Shortly after the last audit was published, two legislators threatened to get rid of the highly respected non-partisan audit bureau. CMD sent records requests to Reps. Adam Jarchow and David Craig, curious as to who was behind the radical move to destroy the audit bureau, but has not yet received their response.
3) Hide the "drafting files" showing how legislation is developed
"Drafting files" reveal the process of developing a bill or budget provision, and are used regularly by journalists to gain insight into how policy is developed. And those insights can sometimes be embarrassing.
Drafting files were key to undermining Walker's claims about his office's changes to the Wisconsin Idea. After the deletion of the "search for truth" sparked a "political firestorm" in Wisconsin and around the country, the governor blamed the change on a “drafting error,” then on a “miscommunication,” and then claimed that the university never raised concerns about the changes. Yet those statements were contradicted by the drafting files examined by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, and documents obtained through records requests, earning Walker a “pants on fire” rating from Politifact.
Drafting files also informed other important investigations. In 2014, for example, a Wisconsin State Journal examination of drafting files showed a wealthy, divorced donor to Rep. Joel Kleefisch helping to write a bill that would have lowered his child support payments. If these amendments were enacted, those records--and the donor's influence--would have been kept secret.
Additionally, drafting records aren't just important for accountability, "they are needed by the courts to discern the legislative intent behind the construction of statutes," said Sklansky, who noted that legislative intent was a consideration in the U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling on the federal health care law.
Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice David Prosser, for example, a former Republican legislator, regularly consults drafting files and legislative records to ascertain legislative intent.
4) Allow the legislature to override the Public Records Law via legislative rule
The proposal also gives the legislature the ability to exempt any additional records from disclosure merely by adopting a new rule by majority vote, without having to go through the legislative process.
By eliminating access to records that had previously been public, this move limits the ability of the press and public to play their watchdog role. Taken together with proposals to dismantle the nonpartisan Government Accountability Board (after it investigated alleged campaign finance violations by Walker's campaign) and the nonpartisan Legislative Audit Bureau (after it critiqued Walker's jobs agency in a scathing audit), all evidence indicates that Governor Walker and his allies are seeking to muzzle the watchdogs.
CMD's Mary Bottari contributed to this article. Follow the news
You didn’t specifically say it, but you did say you were for government spending because you feel that it stimulates the economy.
That is Kenyesian theory.
I simply don’t think one can have it both ways, that’s all.
I will withdraw, because that doesn’t seem to be what this thread is about anyway, and I don’t want to hijack it.
I have never said I was for government spending. I didn’t write the article which was more about the poor ranking of Wisconsin on jobs creation.
I think we need to demolish about three fourths of federal agencies for a start, beginning with the Dept. of Education.
Fair enough, I missed that you excerpted the article. Since you quoted it extensively to buttress your arguments, I assumed you agreed with it even if you didn’t write it.
The mistake was mine.
We all make mistakes. I certainly have. God Bless!
no - of course not.
I meant to send it to the original poster - the guy whose behaving like that.
And to you.
Thx
'Nuff said.
Funny how it's always people who DO NOT live in Wisconsin who say that. Maybe you should try talking to people who...you know...actually live in Wisconsin...
...do a little research on Walker’s WEDC, created and Chaired by him until the legislature removed him from that position last month.
He asked the Wisconsin Legislature to remove him from WEDC's chairmanship, so that HE wouldn't become a distraction to its work.
The WEDC was something he wanted to distance himself from alright. It is a disgrace that even his own party no longer defends. The agencies “work” consists of handing out millions of dollars in loans and taxcuts to companies that are not reviewed for eligibility. The loans don’t get paid and the jobs don’t get created, but there is no followup accountability. 970 million dollars for 5,200 jobs is pathetic.
I do communicate with folks who live in Wisconsin, the majority of whom think Walker is very over rated nationally. I also communicate with folks who lost their jobs in Wisconsin and have moved elsewhere.
IOW, you are pals with unionista Occupy loons.
Got it.
Not at all. These folks voted for Walker. They feel he has let them down on jobs and don’t like what he did with WEDC.
Sure...suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure
So you like what he has done with WEDC? Even his own party has said it’s a disaster. It is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.