1 posted on
07/24/2015 3:56:42 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: SunkenCiv
It was always kind of suspect anyway, wasn’t it?
2 posted on
07/24/2015 3:57:08 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
Okay. This one made me laugh out loud.
3 posted on
07/24/2015 3:57:49 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(The judicial supremacist lie has killed 60 million innocents. Stop it before it kills America.)
To: BenLurkin
So all those centuries of spewing volcanoes have nothing to do with it?
5 posted on
07/24/2015 3:59:42 PM PDT by
abigkahuna
(Here now and whatever....)
To: BenLurkin
6 posted on
07/24/2015 3:59:58 PM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: BenLurkin
We must all revert to communism immediately so that radiocarbon dating will go back to its former razor-sharp accuracy.
After all, the kind of second-rate affirmative-action scientists we have these days have no idea how to use mathematics to correct for slow changes in background data.
8 posted on
07/24/2015 4:00:43 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
To: BenLurkin
So what, we’re not carbon dating the atmosphere.
10 posted on
07/24/2015 4:02:16 PM PDT by
umgud
To: BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
“Heather Graven, a climate-physics researcher at Imperial College London, after an analysis has found that emissions from fossil fuels are artificially raising the carbon age of the atmosphere.”
Boy is that a full pantload or what.
18 posted on
07/24/2015 4:28:52 PM PDT by
Slambat
To: BenLurkin
Sure it does. All that wood burning and wale oil burning in the past didn't cause any pollution or carbon in the atmosphere.
CO2 is absorbed by the ocean and plants quicker than we can produce it. It isn't pollution it is plant food.
19 posted on
07/24/2015 4:32:32 PM PDT by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: BenLurkin
OK, so I put a methane detector in my shorts. And carbon date things.
So I am really old, and haven’t changed my shorts in a billion years?
My wife might agree.
21 posted on
07/24/2015 4:34:49 PM PDT by
Scrambler Bob
(Using 4th keyboard due to wearing out the "/" and "s" on the previous 3)
To: BenLurkin
LMAO! This makes even less sense than the rest of the global warming nonsense-talk about desperation...
22 posted on
07/24/2015 4:36:52 PM PDT by
Texan5
("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
To: BenLurkin
Okay, let’s stop using fuel in order to figure out how old things are...
23 posted on
07/24/2015 4:38:56 PM PDT by
Thorliveshere
(Minnesota Survivor)
To: BenLurkin
Radiocarbon dating which is used to estimate the age of every particular thing on earth....I stopped reading right there. This woman is nuts.
27 posted on
07/24/2015 5:06:37 PM PDT by
onedoug
To: BenLurkin
Riddle me this Ms. Graven, what put more CO2 into the atmosphere, one volcano for one day, or man's emissions for one YEAR?
5.56mm
28 posted on
07/24/2015 5:07:41 PM PDT by
M Kehoe
To: BenLurkin; All
So this means that things that are carbon-dated appear older than they really are.
Fancy that.
29 posted on
07/24/2015 5:12:44 PM PDT by
Yashcheritsiy
(It's time to repeal and replace the GOP)
To: BenLurkin
I posted some comments at the article itself so if you want to read what a former archaeologist thought about it, please go to it.
Not impressed by the writing or even the theories involved.
To: BenLurkin
Oh No!
Now we'll have the young earth crowd aligning with the environ lunatics.
32 posted on
07/24/2015 6:13:57 PM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
To: BenLurkin
Radiocarbon dating is based on the ratio between C12-C14
C14 is created by Cosmic Rays hitting C12 atoms.
Thus if the number of C12 atoms increases, so does the number of C14 atoms created.
In reality its really all Bush’s Fault.
43 posted on
07/25/2015 5:40:21 AM PDT by
Zathras
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson