Well technically she said they were dead broke in 2001 as they left the WH...of course that’s bull$hit too.
They never returned the sofa they stole from the White House.
They may have been technically ‘dead broke’ on paper in ‘01. At the time they owed several million$$$ to the attorneys who handled Bill’s legal “issues.’ BUT it’s like a 34.5 year old trust fund baby whose trust doesn’t come till they’re 35. They knew that they’d be raking in the big bux as soon as they were out of 1600 PA Ave.
It is commonly accepted that most people (especially the low info voter crowd) do not read or hear past the headline or first paragraph. In this case they hear:
HILLARY LIED
That alone is worth the price of admission.
They were below sea level financially when they left office in 2001. But that's before you count their enormous inventory of unsold influence.
When they left the White House, they had some big legal bills.
But, somehow before leaving the White House, they were able to buy 2 mansions, one in Chapaqqua(sp?) so Hillary could pretend to be a New York resident and run for Senate. The other mansion was in a swank Washington, DC neighborhood, as Hillary needed a place to live in Washington as a senator.
“”Well technically she said they were dead broke in 2001 as they left the WH””
That is correct and that should have been pointed out. I’m so sick of articles that are written dishonestly. I’m no fan of the beast but it’s bad enough keeping up with her CURRENT lies without implying the “dead broke” lie applies to current years.
What you say is true regarding 2001. But it is nice to see CNN going after the beast and lying about her, or misrepresenting what she said. Maybe it will stick.