Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux

You miss the point the suit in question is NOT meant to mean settling a legitimate dispute; but creating adverse publicity and legal expense. Everything is now a question of fact which will go to a jury-even a lie-which creates massive legal bills. Questions of law are practically dead.


17 posted on 09/10/2015 7:44:30 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

“You miss the point the suit in question is NOT meant to mean settling a legitimate dispute; but creating adverse publicity and legal expense. Everything is now a question of fact which will go to a jury-even a lie-which creates massive legal bills. Questions of law are practically dead.”

Bears repeating, which I just did for you above, lol. Well said.


19 posted on 09/10/2015 7:48:40 AM PDT by flaglady47 (TRUMP ROCKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
"... the suit in question is NOT meant to mean settling a legitimate dispute; but creating adverse publicity and legal expense."

The activists know if Trumps name is associated they will get tons of free (hopefully sympathetic) publicity. That didn't work out so well for that hack POS Ramos and it won't turn out well for this tool. Trump will go on a mission and uncover every unsavory secret about the guy.

29 posted on 09/10/2015 8:31:20 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson