Posted on 09/18/2015 6:52:32 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[[Doubtless we will also be told that they were gay as well.]]
one of the monkeys had a rainbow colored tooth implant
[[Lucy’s actual remains did not included hands or feet and reconstructions are commonly presented with human or near-human hands and feet despite the fact that other skeletons of the same creature have hands and feet which are clearly those of an ape, with curved fingers for moving about in trees.]]
[[The story actually gets better (much better) from there if you can believe that, with evolutionists claiming that a deer or other animal trampled “Lucy”’s hips and pelvis, breaking them into pieces, and that the pieces congealed by chances into the conformation of those of an ape, and deriving the true picture of Lucy’s hips and pelvis by making a plaster cast, breaking it up with a saw, and then rearranging the pieces into a more human conformation. ]]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/1651429/posts
The artist’s rendering looks similar to Obama’s childhood transvestite babysitter. /sarc (or maybe not so sarc?)
Im guessing that his description and name will stand, but well see.
I agree with your guess, but I think technology has probably overcome your other comment on whether the other scientists had seen the fossils.
The TV presentation showed the bones being 3D scanned into a computer and exact replicas being made by a 3D printing process.
The other scientists world wide only need the digital 3D files to fully examine the shape and details of the fossils.
Score another one for technology and digital engineering...:^)
Correction: “She” wasn’t a transvestite, she was transgendered. And “she” was Barry’s “Nanny” and not his babysitter.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/world/story/2012-03-05/obama-transgender-nanny/53372092/1
[[She wasnt a transvestite, she was transgendered.]]
Whatever- they all look alike to me- unnatural
The scientists admit they dont know the fossils age: The bones were not in a sediment layer that could be dated, and the researchers have not yet performed radiocarbon dating, which will damage the bones. Based on their interpretation of the evolutionary tree, they believe the fossils to be 2.5 million years old or more.
From Wikipedia:
Radiocarbon dating is generally limited to dating samples no more than 50,000 years old, as samples older than that have insufficient 14 C to be measurable. Older dates have been obtained by using special sample preparation techniques, large samples, and very long measurement times. These techniques can allow dates up to 60,000 and in some cases up to 75,000 years before the present to be measured.
Thus - what the author of the article fails to recognize, or outright contradicts - radiocarbon dating would be useless in dating these fossils.
Regards,
Hmmm....I wonder, what would the skeleton’s of these two guys reveal about their “species”:
http://www.media4news.com/tallest-and-shortest-men-in-the-world-met-together-in-london/
Might be related to Al Sharpton ...
********************
Reminds me more of former CA Rep. Waxman
I don’t think there is a clear cut division in many cases between these protohumans.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.