Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Vanity] Has a Supreme Court decision ever been overturned?

Posted on 10/10/2015 8:10:22 PM PDT by cradle of freedom

Has a Supreme Court decision every been overturned? Does the Constitution permit a way to fix a bad Supreme Court decision?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 14thamendment; abortion; anchorbabies; anchorbaby; deathpanels; epa; fourteenthamendment; gaykkk; gaymarriage; globalwarminghoax; h1b; homosexualagenda; libertarians; medicalmarijuana; obamacare; plannedparenthood; popefrancis; romancatholicism; secondamendment; stemexpress; supremecourt; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: cradle of freedom

The Constitution does NOT make the USSC the last word on the Constitution. The Court- Chief Justice Marbury- assumed that power.


21 posted on 10/10/2015 8:32:36 PM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

Blackmail is a brutally effective tool. I think we all have something we would do anything to keep secret.

When it’s men in power, it’s very dangerous.

As for me, i’m 47, an ex boxer, and straight, but sometimes i squeeze my cat and call him my baby. now if that were ever to get out...oh wait


22 posted on 10/10/2015 8:34:10 PM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

They have overruled themselves a few times. They do whatever they want to do because they think they are all powerful gods.


23 posted on 10/10/2015 8:34:27 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nuc 1.1
Correct. We need a constitutional amendment to allow a certain number of states to nullify past or present Supreme Court decisions.

I like Mark Levin's suggestion from The Liberty Amendments

SECTION 1: No person may serve as Chief Justice or Associate Justice of the Supreme Court for more than a combined total of twelve years.

SECTION 2: Immediately upon ratification of this Amendment, Congress will organize the justices of the Supreme Court as equally as possible into three classes, with the justices assigned to each class in reverse seniority order, with the most senior justices in the earliest classes. The terms of office for the justices in the First Class will expire at the end of the fourth Year following the ratification of this Amendment, the terms for the justices of the Second Class will expire at the end of the eighth Year, and of the Third Class at the end of the twelfth Year, so that one-third of the justices may be chosen every fourth Year.

SECTION 3: When a vacancy occurs in the Supreme Court, the President shall nominate a new justice who, with the approval of a majority of the Senate, shall serve the remainder of the unexpired term. Justices who fill a vacancy for longer than half of an unexpired term may not be renominated to a full term.

SECTION 4: Upon three-fifths vote of the House of Representatives and the Senate, Congress may override a majority opinion rendered by the Supreme Court.

SECTION 5: The Congressional override under Section 4 is not subject to a Presidential veto and shall not be the subject of litigation or review in any Federal or State court.

SECTION 6: Upon three-fifths vote of the several state legislatures, the States may override a majority opinion rendered by the Supreme Court.

SECTION 7: The States’ override under Section 6 shall not be the subject of litigation or review in any Federal or State court, or oversight or interference by Congress or the President.

SECTION 8: Congressional or State override authority under Sections 4 and 6 must be exercised no later than twenty-four months from the date of the Supreme Court rendering its majority opinion, after which date Congress and the States are prohibited” from exercising the override.

24 posted on 10/10/2015 8:35:14 PM PDT by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
> As for me, i’m 47, an ex boxer, and straight, but sometimes i squeeze my cat and call him my baby. now if that were ever to get out...oh wait

Don't worry. Your secret is safe with me...: ^ )

25 posted on 10/10/2015 8:36:35 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

The federal Congress can set the boundaries of the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction. It can set some issues beyond the purview of federal courts.

The Congress could pass a law recognizing the scientific fact that human life begins at conception, that laws dealing with the taking of innocent human life apply, and that the courts may not review these findings. This would take abortion out of the jurisdiction of federal courts.


26 posted on 10/10/2015 8:36:39 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

“Actually, it was the Civil War which overturned Dred Scott.”

Well that’s certainly the pop-version of history.

Assuming you mean the Emancipation Proclamation, that affected only the “states in rebellion” meaning that it did not apply to slaves in the states that remained in the Union.

The civil war ended in April 1865. Slavery continued in some Union states until the 13th Amendment went into effect on December 18, 1865


27 posted on 10/10/2015 8:42:16 PM PDT by Pelham (A refusal to deport is defacto amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nuc 1.1

I am surprised that you thought the Supreme Court allowing the vote count in Florida to stop was horrible. I think the Supreme Court does a decent job overall. The gay marriage, abortion and obamacare rulings were the worst. However, they did wonders for Hobby Lobby and others.


28 posted on 10/10/2015 8:42:23 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Walker for President 2016. The only candidate with actual real RESULTS!!!!! The rest...talkers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

Meow!

That’s cat for give me 50 bucks to keep your secret safe. (for a few days at least)


29 posted on 10/10/2015 8:45:15 PM PDT by crusher2013 (Liberalism is Aristocracy masquerading as equality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom; null and void; Velveeta; Myrddin; Califreak; Salvation; WildHighlander57; ...

Article and # 16.

30 posted on 10/10/2015 8:46:01 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom
" I do not forget the position assumed by some that constitutional questions are to be decided by the Supreme Court, nor do I deny that such decisions must be binding in any case upon the parties to a suit as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high respect and consideration in all parallel cases by all other departments of the Government....At the same time, the candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the Government upon vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made in ordinary litigation between parties in personal actions the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned their Government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."

-- Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address

-----

Only laws can be "overturned," and courts do NOT make laws.

The courts are only legitimately empowered to rule in the cases that come before them, which rulings are binding only on the parties to those cases. That's it. They have no legislative powers, no veto powers, no executive powers.

Any opinions the courts has are their own. They are not binding on the other branches of government, whose officers have sworn a sacred oath to support and defend the Constitution, not to obey usurping, immoral, out of control judges.

The judicial supremacist lie is destroying this free republic.

31 posted on 10/10/2015 8:47:10 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

OMG learn some history

Poesy vs Ferguson
Dred Scott

The history of SCOTUS is full of over turned decisions PLUS congress can act to undue a decision

Read your constitution. Read Mark Levin


32 posted on 10/10/2015 8:47:59 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24; cradle of freedom

Nope. The court’s jurisdiction in most cases is subject to such “exceptions and regulations” that Congress passes. Read Article III. So Congress can pass a bill and forbid the court to rule on it’s constitutionality.


33 posted on 10/10/2015 8:48:11 PM PDT by Hugin ("First thing--get yourself a firearm!" Sheriff Ed Galt, Last Man Standing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

WRONG


34 posted on 10/10/2015 8:48:15 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Also wrong


35 posted on 10/10/2015 8:48:38 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: crusher2013

lol. I’d be ruined in these parts.


36 posted on 10/10/2015 8:48:56 PM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LS

This was the Warren Court. He was an activist (and a Traitor) He overturned many laws that had previously been ruled in the opposite way. There was a movement to have him impeached, but the media wouldn’t hear of it. When Ike left office he said that the worst decision he ever made in his life was appointing Earl Warren to SCOTUS. Roe vs Wade was another gem. about every un-American ruling began under this evil man. He changed the intent of the 13 and 14 Amendments.


37 posted on 10/10/2015 8:51:23 PM PDT by RightLady (It's gotta be Cruiz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

.... and civil war.


38 posted on 10/10/2015 8:54:24 PM PDT by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

“So Congress can pass a bill and forbid the court to rule on it’s constitutionality.”

That didn’t work with Gitmo.


39 posted on 10/10/2015 8:54:57 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom
If the Supreme Court is merely construing a statute, Congress can (and often does) clarify the statute if they're not happy with the Supreme Court's interpretation.

If the Supreme Court is interpreting the Constitution, its decision can be overturned by a constitutional amendment (as mentioned above, the 14th Amendment overturned Dred Scott; and the 16th Amendment overturned the Pollack case which held certain forms of income tax unconstitutional).

The Supreme Court has also overruled its own prior constitutional decisions, although not often. Brown v. Board of Education overruled Plessy v. Ferguson, for example.

40 posted on 10/10/2015 8:55:17 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson