Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Help with my essay on the "right to revolution"?

Posted on 10/25/2015 11:00:06 AM PDT by Politicalkiddo

So I am writing a paper for my PoliSci class on the "right of revolution" and I plan to use John Locke's writings as my main supporting evidence. My professor, however, wants me to find a specific someone who was/is against the idea of people having the right to revolution, and I cannot find anyone specific. I keep finding vague answers about monarchs, but no one who has actually spoken/written out against the idea. Any suggestions? :) Thank you!


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; History
KEYWORDS: college; essay; history
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: Politicalkiddo

Who was that King of England who waged war against
the American colonies to keep them from getting
freedom? What was that Revolution?


81 posted on 10/25/2015 1:06:43 PM PDT by Twinkie (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo

In reading Reflections on the Revolution in France by Burke you will get all the cautionary thinking you need.

Many conservative thinkers (Kirk) would hold that our revolution was a rebellion not a revolution in the sense of what occurred in France. We kept our states and their legislatures. We kept our property rights and clergy. Revolution since the French has been almost always leftist — Burke will show you why.


82 posted on 10/25/2015 1:07:03 PM PDT by KC Burke (Ceterum censeo Islam esse delendam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo

Seems like an over abundance of old men yelling, “Get off my lawn.”

Politicalkiddo - don’t pay attention to them. Just follow up on the great suggestions.


83 posted on 10/25/2015 1:23:38 PM PDT by rbbeachkid (Get out of its way and small business can fix the economy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo; x
x is right.

Look up Patriacha by Sir Robert Filmer. Under his Divine Right of Kings doctrine, God himself empowered kings to rule. The people were supposed to accept occasional tyranny as if it was no more than passing bad weather.

John Locke, James Tyrell and Algernon Sidney responded with works to strike down Filmer. For his efforts, Sidney was executed by Charles II for high treason.

Sidney's Discourses Concerning Government has been touted as the "textbook to revolution" for Britain's American colonists by Gordon Wood and Caroline Robbins. These 17th Century Enlightenment polemicists set the modern stage for our constitution in their refutations of the divine right of kings.

I highly recommend Alan Craig Houston's Algernon Sidney and the Republican Heritage in England and America for condensed comments and references to refute Filmer.

84 posted on 10/25/2015 1:29:49 PM PDT by Jacquerie ( To shun Article V is to embrace tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo
For starters study the following:

U.S. Constitution

Article I...SECTION 8. The Congress shall have Power...To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;...SECTION 10. 1 No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation;...No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay. ARTICLE III...SECTION 3. 1 Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. ARTICLE IV...SECTION 3. 1 New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress... SECTION 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

U.S. Code; Title 18; Part I; Chapter 12 § 231 (a) (1) Whoever teaches or demonstrates to any other person the use, application, or making of any firearm or explosive or incendiary device, or technique capable of causing injury or death to persons, knowing or having reason to know or intending that the same will be unlawfully employed for use in, or in furtherance of, a civil disorder which may in any way or degree obstruct, delay, or adversely affect commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in commerce or the conduct or performance of any federally protected function; or

(2) Whoever transports or manufactures for transportation in commerce any firearm, or explosive or incendiary device, knowing or having reason to know or intending that the same will be used unlawfully in furtherance of a civil disorder; or

(3) Whoever commits or attempts to commit any act to obstruct, impede, or interfere with any fireman or law enforcement officer lawfully engaged in the lawful performance of his official duties incident to and during the commission of a civil disorder which in any way or degree obstructs, delays, or adversely affects commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in commerce or the conduct or performance of any federally protected function— Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(b) Nothing contained in this section shall make unlawful any act of any law enforcement officer which is performed in the lawful performance of his official duties.

U.S. Code; Title 18; Part I; Chapter 12 § 232 For purposes of this chapter:

(1) The term “civil disorder” means any public disturbance involving acts of violence by assemblages of three or more persons, which causes an immediate danger of or results in damage or injury to the property or person of any other individual.

U.S. Code; Title 18; Part I; Chapter 115 § 2383 Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

U.S. Code; Title 18; Part I; Chapter 115 § 2384 If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

U.S. Code; Title 18; Part I; Chapter 115 § 2385 Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or

Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.

U.S. Code; Title 18; Part I; Chapter 115 § 2387 (a) Whoever, with intent to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States: (1) advises, counsels, urges, or in any manner causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States; or

(2) distributes or attempts to distribute any written or printed matter which advises, counsels, or urges insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

(b) For the purposes of this section, the term “military or naval forces of the United States” includes the Army of the United States, the Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Coast Guard Reserve of the United States; and, when any merchant vessel is commissioned in the Navy or is in the service of the Army or the Navy, includes the master, officers, and crew of such vessel.

U.S. Code; Title 18; Part I; Chapter 115 § 2388 (a) Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully makes or conveys false reports or false statements with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies; or Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty, in the military or naval forces of the United States, or willfully obstructs the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, to the injury of the service or the United States, or attempts to do so—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(b) If two or more persons conspire to violate subsection (a) of this section and one or more such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be punished as provided in said subsection (a).

(c) Whoever harbors or conceals any person who he knows, or has reasonable grounds to believe or suspect, has committed, or is about to commit, an offense under this section, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(d) This section shall apply within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States, and on the high seas, as well as within the United States.

U.S. Code; Title 18; Part I; Chapter 115 § 2390 Whoever enlists or is engaged within the United States or in any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof, with intent to serve in armed hostility against the United States, shall be fined under this title [1] or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

U.S. Code; Title 50; Chapter 13 § 205 - Suspension of commercial intercourse with State in insurrection Whenever the President, in pursuance of the provisions of this chapter, has called forth the militia to suppress combinations against the laws of the United States, and to cause the laws to be duly executed, and the insurgents shall have failed to disperse by the time directed by the President, and when the insurgents claim to act under the authority of any State or States, and such claim is not disclaimed or repudiated by the persons exercising the functions of government in such State or States, or in the part or parts thereof in which such combination exists, and such insurrection is not suppressed by such State or States, or whenever the inhabitants of any State or part thereof are at any time found by the President to be in insurrection against the United States, the President may, by proclamation, declare that the inhabitants of such State, or of any section or part thereof where such insurrection exists, are in a state of insurrection against the United States; and thereupon all commercial intercourse by and between the same and the citizens thereof and the citizens of the rest of the United States shall cease and be unlawful so long as such condition of hostility shall continue; and all goods and chattels, wares and merchandise, coming from such State or section into the other parts of the United States, or proceeding from other parts of the United States to such State or section, by land or water, shall, together with the vessel or vehicle conveying the same, or conveying persons to or from such State or section, be forfeited to the United States.

U.S. Code; Title 50; Chapter 13 § 2389 Whoever recruits soldiers or sailors within the United States, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof, to engage in armed hostility against the same; or

Whoever opens within the United States, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof, a recruiting station for the enlistment of such soldiers or sailors to serve in any manner in armed hostility against the United States—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

U.S. Code; Title 50; Chapter 23; Subchapter I § 783 (a) Communication of classified information by Government officer or employee

It shall be unlawful for any officer or employee of the United States or of any department or agency thereof, or of any corporation the stock of which is owned in whole or in major part by the United States or any department or agency thereof, to communicate in any manner or by any means, to any other person whom such officer or employee knows or has reason to believe to be an agent or representative of any foreign government, any information of a kind which shall have been classified by the President (or by the head of any such department, agency, or corporation with the approval of the President) as affecting the security of the United States, knowing or having reason to know that such information has been so classified, unless such officer or employee shall have been specifically authorized by the President, or by the head of the department, agency, or corporation by which this officer or employee is employed, to make such disclosure of such information.

(b) Receipt of, or attempt to receive, by foreign agent or member of Communist organization, classified information

It shall be unlawful for any agent or representative of any foreign government knowingly to obtain or receive, or attempt to obtain or receive, directly or indirectly, from any officer or employee of the United States or of any department or agency thereof or of any corporation the stock of which is owned in whole or in major part by the United States or any department or agency thereof, any information of a kind which shall have been classified by the President (or by the head of any such department, agency, or corporation with the approval of the President) as affecting the security of the United States, unless special authorization for such communication shall first have been obtained from the head of the department, agency, or corporation having custody of or control over such information.

(c) Penalties for violation Any person who violates any provision of this section shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000, or imprisonment for not more than ten years, or by both such fine and such imprisonment, and shall, moreover, be thereafter ineligible to hold any office, or place of honor, profit, or trust created by the Constitution or laws of the United States.

(d) Limitation period Any person may be prosecuted, tried, and punished for any violation of this section at any time within ten years after the commission of such offense, notwithstanding the provisions of any other statute of limitations: Provided, That if at the time of the commission of the offense such person is an officer or employee of the United States or of any department or agency thereof, or of any corporation the stock of which is owned in whole or in major part by the United States or any department or agency thereof, such person may be prosecuted, tried, and punished for any violation of this section at any time within ten years after such person has ceased to be employed as such officer or employee.

(e) Forfeiture of property

(1) Any person convicted of a violation of this section shall forfeit to the United States irrespective of any provision of State law—

(A) any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds the person obtained, directly or indirectly, as the result of such violation; and

(B) any of the person’s property used, or intended to be used, in any manner or part, to commit, or to facilitate the commission of, such violation.

(2) The court, in imposing sentence on a defendant for a conviction of a violation of this section, shall order that the defendant forfeit to the United States all property described in paragraph (1).

(3) Except as provided in paragraph (4), the provisions of subsections (b), (c), and (e) through (p) ofsection 853 of title 21 shall apply to— (

(A) property subject to forfeiture under this subsection;

(B) any seizure or disposition of such property; and

(C) any administrative or judicial proceeding in relation to such property, if not inconsistent with this subsection.

(4) Notwithstanding section 524 (c) of title 28, there shall be deposited in the Crime Victims Fund established under section 10601 of title 42 all amounts from the forfeiture of property under this subsection remaining after the payment of expenses for forfeiture and sale authorized by law.

(5) As used in this subsection, the term “State” means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and any territory or possession of the United States.

U.S. Code; Title 50; Chapter 23; Subchapter IV § 841 The Congress finds and declares that the Communist Party of the United States, although purportedly a political party, is in fact an instrumentality of a conspiracy to overthrow the Government of the United States. It constitutes an authoritarian dictatorship within a republic, demanding for itself the rights and privileges accorded to political parties, but denying to all others the liberties guaranteed by the Constitution. Unlike political parties, which evolve their policies and programs through public means, by the reconciliation of a wide variety of individual views, and submit those policies and programs to the electorate at large for approval or disapproval, the policies and programs of the Communist Party are secretly prescribed for it by the foreign leaders of the world Communist movement. Its members have no part in determining its goals, and are not permitted to voice dissent to party objectives. Unlike members of political parties, members of the Communist Party are recruited for indoctrination with respect to its objectives and methods, and are organized, instructed, and disciplined to carry into action slavishly the assignments given them by their hierarchical chieftains. Unlike political parties, the Communist Party acknowledges no constitutional or statutory limitations upon its conduct or upon that of its members. The Communist Party is relatively small numerically, and gives scant indication of capacity ever to attain its ends by lawful political means. The peril inherent in its operation arises not from its numbers, but from its failure to acknowledge any limitation as to the nature of its activities, and its dedication to the proposition that the present constitutional Government of the United States ultimately must be brought to ruin by any available means, including resort to force and violence. Holding that doctrine, its role as the agency of a hostile foreign power renders its existence a clear present and continuing danger to the security of the United States. It is the means whereby individuals are seduced into the service of the world Communist movement, trained to do its bidding, and directed and controlled in the conspiratorial performance of their revolutionary services. Therefore, the Communist Party should be outlawed.

U.S. Code; Title 50; Chapter 23; Subchapter IV § 842 The Communist Party of the United States, or any successors of such party regardless of the assumed name, whose object or purpose is to overthrow the Government of the United States, or the government of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein by force and violence, are not entitled to any of the rights, privileges, and immunities attendant upon legal bodies created under the jurisdiction of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof; and whatever rights, privileges, and immunities which have heretofore been granted to said party or any subsidiary organization by reason of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, are terminated: Provided, however, That nothing in this section shall be construed as amending the Internal Security Act of 1950, as amended [50 U.S.C. 781 et seq.]

U.S. Code; Title 50; Chapter 23; Subchapter IV § 843 (a) Whoever knowingly and willfully becomes or remains a member of

(1) the Communist Party, or

(2) any other organization having for one of its purposes or objectives the establishment, control, conduct, seizure, or overthrow of the Government of the United States, or the government of any State or political subdivision thereof, by the use of force or violence, with knowledge of the purpose or objective of such organization shall be subject to all the provisions and penalties of the Internal Security Act of 1950, as amended [50 U.S.C. 781 et seq.], as a member of a “Communist-action” organization.

(b) For the purposes of this section, the term “Communist Party” means the organization now known as the Communist Party of the United States of America, the Communist Party of any State or subdivision thereof, and any unit or subdivision of any such organization, whether or not any change is hereafter made in the name thereof.

U.S. Code; Title 50; Chapter 23; Subchapter IV § 844 In determining membership or participation in the Communist Party or any other organization defined in this Act, or knowledge of the purpose or objective of such party or organization, the jury, under instructions from the court, shall consider evidence, if presented, as to whether the accused person:

(1) Has been listed to his knowledge as a member in any book or any of the lists, records, correspondence, or any other document of the organization;

(2) Has made financial contribution to the organization in dues, assessments, loans, or in any other form;

(3) Has made himself subject to the discipline of the organization in any form whatsoever;

(4) Has executed orders, plans, or directives of any kind of the organization;

(5) Has acted as an agent, courier, messenger, correspondent, organizer, or in any other capacity in behalf of the organization;

(6) Has conferred with officers or other members of the organization in behalf of any plan or enterprise of the organization;

(7) Has been accepted to his knowledge as an officer or member of the organization or as one to be called upon for services by other officers or members of the organization;

(8) Has written, spoken or in any other way communicated by signal, semaphore, sign, or in any other form of communication orders, directives, or plans of the organization;

(9) Has prepared documents, pamphlets, leaflets, books, or any other type of publication in behalf of the objectives and purposes of the organization;

(10) Has mailed, shipped, circulated, distributed, delivered, or in any other way sent or delivered to others material or propaganda of any kind in behalf of the organization;

(11) Has advised, counseled or in any other way imparted information, suggestions, recommendations to officers or members of the organization or to anyone else in behalf of the objectives of the organization;

(12) Has indicated by word, action, conduct, writing or in any other way a willingness to carry out in any manner and to any degree the plans, designs, objectives, or purposes of the organization;

(13) Has in any other way participated in the activities, planning, actions, objectives, or purposes of the organization;

(14) The enumeration of the above subjects of evidence on membership or participation in the Communist Party or any other organization as above defined, shall not limit the inquiry into and consideration of any other subject of evidence on membership and participation as herein stated.
[Study the works of Hugo Grotius]

Hugo Grotius. On the Law of War and Peace (De Jure Belli ac Pacis). Translated by A. C. Campbell London, 1814.

CHAPTER 3: The Divison of War Into Public and Private and the Nature of Sovereign Power.

Book I CHAPTER 3: The Divison of War Into Public and Private and the Nature of Sovereign Power.

The Division of War into public and private — Examples to prove that all private — War is not repugnant to the Law of Nature since the erection of Courts of Justice — The Division of Public War into formal, and informal — Whether the suppression of Tumults by subordinate Magistrates be properly public War — Civil Power, in what it consists — Sovereign Power further considered — The opinion of those, who maintain that the Sovereign Power is always in the people, refuted, and their arguments answered — Mutual subjection refuted — Cautions requisite to understand the nature of Sovereign Power — Distinction of the real differences that exist under similar names — Distinction between the right to Sovereign Power, and the mode of exercising it.

Divine right of kings

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_right_of_kings

85 posted on 10/25/2015 1:30:34 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo

Locke versus Hobbes
http://jim.com/hobbes.htm

Hobbes:
Men cannot know good and evil, and in consequence can only live in peace together by subjection to the absolute power of a common master, and therefore there can be no peace between kings. Peace between states is merely war by other means.

No right to rebel. “there can happen no breach of covenant on the part of the sovereign; and consequently none of his subjects, by any pretence of forfeiture, can be freed from his subjection.” The ruler’s will defines good and evil for his subjects. The King can do no wrong, because lawful and unlawful, good and evil, are merely commands, merely the will of the ruler.


86 posted on 10/25/2015 1:37:32 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo

Locke versus Machiavelli

Comparing views on the relationship between the individual and that state.

by Edward Blades on 28 November 2011

https://prezi.com/52ikcpig4ln4/locke-versus-machiavelli/


87 posted on 10/25/2015 1:43:35 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo

Right of revolution
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_revolution


88 posted on 10/25/2015 1:46:03 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo

Rousseau & the Revolt Against Reason

by Mary Ann Glendon

October 1999

http://www.firstthings.com/article/1999/10/rousseau-amp-the-revolt-against-reason


89 posted on 10/25/2015 2:01:13 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Thanks for the sources. :)


90 posted on 10/25/2015 2:11:41 PM PDT by Politicalkiddo ("'Return to me, and I will return to you,' says the LORD Almighty." -Malachi 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Twinkie

That has nothing truly to do with my paper. Locke is the real object of my paper. The King George III, to my knowledge, did not write essays on the subject.


91 posted on 10/25/2015 2:13:57 PM PDT by Politicalkiddo ("'Return to me, and I will return to you,' says the LORD Almighty." -Malachi 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: rbbeachkid

Thanks. :) I am finding a wealth of information.


92 posted on 10/25/2015 2:15:11 PM PDT by Politicalkiddo ("'Return to me, and I will return to you,' says the LORD Almighty." -Malachi 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo

Robert Filmer and Thomas Hobbes


93 posted on 10/25/2015 2:36:00 PM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo

Well . . . King George *could* have written an essay
about how mad he was that the upstart George Washington
was disobeying his DIRECT ORDERS!! Isn’t that *possible*?

OK. If that won’t do; then just find some stuff on Locke
and go with that! No one on here cares what Twinkie
thinks about ANYTHING!!


94 posted on 10/25/2015 3:57:00 PM PDT by Twinkie (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo
Someone may have beaten me to it, if so, I'll second the idea of looking into writings or speeches by revolutionary leaders before and after a successful revolution.
Whether Castro, Cromwell, Trotsky or Dzerzhisky, Mao Tse-tung or Chang Kai-shek, fanatical tyrants generally started off as rabid revolutionaries.
Wouldn't be much of a stretch to fit Obama into that list.
[Jonah Goldberg's Liberal Fascism might help regarding public statements by Hitler and Mussolini.]
95 posted on 10/25/2015 4:08:11 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo

Try virtually any communist opinion of counterrevolution.


96 posted on 10/25/2015 5:27:30 PM PDT by matt1234 (Note to GOPe lurkers: I and thousands like me will NEVER vote for Jeb Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo

A closely related question is whether a state can secede from the Union.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/74/700

In Texas v. White, Chief Justice Chase wrote the majority opinion - that a state cannot secede. This does not directly address the entirety of the right to revolution, but the questions are a close parallel. Since many revolutions are not intended to overthrow the entire government (the American Revolution, the Indian uprising, and many others come to mind), this is the former Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court arguing against the right to revolution as that right is most often exercised.


97 posted on 10/25/2015 5:51:58 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo

Barack H. Obama has proven he’s against even peaceful revolution by the content of the enemies named by Homeland inSecurity and the FBI’s “domestic terrorist” operation which targets anti-government Americans.


98 posted on 10/25/2015 10:02:09 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo

I’ll bet you can find lots of dictators or other people in power that were against revolutions.


99 posted on 10/26/2015 1:21:43 AM PDT by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalkiddo
I am asking not for examples of supporters, but for examples of detractors.

And I am offering the reasons why the “detractors” are wrong (penned and agreed to by the men who declared America’s independence from GB).

100 posted on 10/26/2015 8:53:23 AM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson