[jsanders2001]

Good luck finding their bones. Of course we know why the article was written. It has nothing to do with trying to find out if Adam and Eve ever existed. Hell we can’t even find our ancestors nack a thousands except on rare occassion and that’s only if records were kept and you kow where to search. No. Its about creating doubt about the Bible and God. Nothing more. Its a progressive liberal trying to be “clever” using Alinskyish techniques once again. But if they did happen to find a gravestone with “here lies Adam of Eden” they’d never show us anyway. They’d probably relay the coordinates to ISIS for demolation.

[a fool in paradise]

Spirited Debate: Dr. Fazal Rana and Dr. Hugh Ross believe religion and science can prove how life began

Liberal SINOs (Scientists in name only) are unwilling to even state when life BEGINS with evidence and case history all around them every day.

[StoneWall Brigade]

Ping

[Jonty30]

They might be able to prove what parts of our genetic code have a common root.

[Bryanw92]

The Flood would have wiped away their graves and changed the landscape so much that all attempts to discover the “source” of mankind is always going to be confusing and contradictory.

[CaptainMorgantown]

I’ve read before that by analyzing DNA and mutation rates from human populations around the world, there is some evidence that all humans are descendants of a single common female ancestor.

The female ancestor would have lived about 250,000 years ago according to that study. (And yes, I know that the single common ancestor will please biblical literalists, but the dating will not).

[kinsman redeemer]

Personally, I don’t need scientific proof..

God said it.

I’m not surprised that the truth of God’ Word would be confirmed once the genome was mapped and the scientific understanding of God”s creation was better understood.

I belied in a literal Adam and Eve, a literal 6-day creation, that Jesus Christ is Lord, and that he is coming again to judge the living and the dead.

I don’t doubt it.

[Marko413]

Genetically speaking, it is very possible and no geneticist can say that it is an impossible idea.

[DungeonMaster]

Science can’t even prove God is real.

[Hebrews 11:6]

Thanks for posting this. I've read Who Was Adam, and it presents a well-researched persuasive case for identifying a single Y-chromosomal male and a single Mitochondrial Eve at the confluence of the four rivers mentioned in Genesis (a site now underwater).

There will always be scoffers--indeed, they will always constitute a majority, according to the Bible--but for those willing to look at the evidence, it certainly points to a real Adam and Eve. All the numerous Biblical creation accounts (Job, Genesis, Psalms, etc.) are being increasingly borne out by scientific discoveries as being literally true.

[minnesota_bound]

That Eve was such a vixen : )

[TruthWillWin]

Considering sciences performance on global cooling/global warming/climate change, I say no.