If you are who you say you are, then why are you spending so much energy arguing about things other people wrote with me.
I would think a former CEO knows better than that.
Like the ramblings of a mad man, arguing with anyone who would attempt to engage him in polite conversation with all the vehemence of an attack on the writings and statements of others.
Do you break out in an argument when you see a non-apple product user on the sidewalk?
How close to physical violence do you come?
Do you have medication?
At the very start of this, I complemented Apple as the Mercedes of phones. I don’t dislike Apple, but they are “Computing for the Masses” which I do not want for this very reason.
I have not insulted you . . . but you now devolve to ad hominem attack and personal insult, the sure sign of someone without facts to back up their position in any debate. You've done this before in this discussion and I ignored it. So pathetic.
I have not rambled but have been quite succinct and stated only the facts necessary to make my point. I have not been vehement, but have countered your examples with reasoned argument, which you cannot seem to abide, being unwilling to accept criticism of your position. I have politely given you legitimate reasons why your examples did not meet the challenge. I took the time to correct your chart with up-to-date, accurate information. I did not dismiss them out-of-hand or insult you. My criticism was based on the factual nature of what you posted. . . not on your postings.
In exchange you imply that I may be violent and in need of medication when it is you who have not provided rational examples of your position. . .
You claim that Apple products are "computing for the masses" when you choose the actual platform that is followed by the vast majority of the masses. Do you not see the fallacy and illogicality of your position?