[SkyPilot]

There is a 2+ hour programs that lends much, much, much more evidence (using the Shroud and years of painstaking research) that is face is much closer to the truth:

[trisham]

Thanks, SkyPilot.

[Swordmaker]

There is a 2+ hour programs that lends much, much, much more evidence (using the Shroud and years of painstaking research) that is face is much closer to the truth:

I think the methodology of the scientists and artists who worked on that reconstruction were much more stringent and rigorous to scientific principle. They did not go for the least common denominator and at the start used the best evidence at hand. The also used better demographics for the period and did not assume the worst assumptions based on modern perceptions as did Neave, who assumed the stature of all Jews was short.

This group did their work using modern techniques but retained the ethnicity if the man to be imaged . . . and you can see that the results can still result in the image on the Shroud. They were aware that the hank bleaching of the Shroud artificially narrowed the facial image on the Shroud, giving the Man on the Shroud a narrower, gaunter look than he should have, by darkening the sides of the face. Ergo, their reconstructed face is rounder, less gaunt.

[annieokie]

I just posted a link to that very Documentary. That was the best doc., I have ever seen, and I do believe that they recreated HIS face as it would have been. Everyone should take the time to watch the Doc., and see how painstakingly accurate they tried to be. Truly Amazing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNJPJ4JwHeE (I can't make it clickable, sorry)