Posted on 01/17/2016 10:53:15 AM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans
ping
Excellent movie. Leonardo DiCaprio should finally win an Oscar
I liked it better when it was called, “Jeremiah Johnson”
I saw t, too and had abou the same reaction especially with the cinematography. The lyrical storytelling reminded me of a Terrence Mallik movie.I never did figure where Leonardo got his modern jacket after he shed the bearskin though. Neither did I interpret the bear scene as a rape..just very primitive and relentless violence. Living in Montana a number of years and being outdoors a lot made me well aware of the possibility and horror of a bear attack. Would give the movie a B+.
Dialogue was hard to understand due to strong accents. Some of it was lost on me too, though I got most of it.
Are you thinking of MAN IN THE WILDERNESS with Richard Harris? Same story.
Jeremiah Johnson was the story of “Liver Eat’in Johnson”, without the liver eating. Years later Johnson said he never really ate the Indian’s liver, he just passed it in front of his mouth. It put the fear in the enemy warriors watching him.
That’s the one.
Thanks... I love movie reviews. I will pass on this one.
There are two scenes which will revolutionize the Western genre, the Indian attack and the bear attack. Additionally, the movie is grand in its depiction of the landscape but that of course had already been done by half a century earlier by John Ford.
These considerations are visual rather than storyline but the cinema is after all a visual experience and advances in that experience are noteworthy and should be acknowledged.
The storyline in the movie is weak, the vapid spiritualism in the movie is misplaced, the motivation of Hugo Glass for revenge is contrived or at least I thought so since I knew the true story of this extraordinary and epic journey and I know that it had nothing to do with the murder of Hugh Glass' son so perhaps I was put off by this dramatic contrivance.
It is the motivation that the moviemakers get wrong and it is the gratuitous political correctness concerning Indians inserted into the film that distort the pristine story.
See the movie, it is a turning point in Western films because of the virtuosity of the technology in depicting the bear attack and to a lesser degree the scope of the cinematography. Not since Jaws have we seen such a turning point of this particular cinematic action.
I’m just glad Hugh Glass wasn’t named Huge Jass.
No worries, I'll crank it in the house when I buy it on DVD.
With the exception of the scenery and the special effects when the bear attacked, it sucked.
Simplistic plot dragged out for 2.5 hours.
JMO
Good review of an extremely impressive film. DiCaprio got the Golden Globe for this, should also get the Oscar.
It’s a fiction based on a true story. So, there were several departures from reality that I would preferred had not made it into the narrative, but to be fair to the film makers, they were most likely already part of the novel on which the film was directly built. They have to be forgiven for a lot of this and I think that overall, the film succeeds. But it’s not really the true story of Hugh Glass at all.
They could have used subtitles.
I thought it was pretty boring and one hour too long.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.