Posted on 02/05/2016 1:36:01 PM PST by conservativejoy
Not at all. 1 Peter 4:11 says: “If anyone speaks, they should do so as the very words of God.” Obviously pastors speak both God’s Word as well as in God’s stead.Yet if you’re going to tell someone to remove a log, ya better be sure that’s a divine directive where God wants that given person to hear that for a specific situation. What I see on FR thru the years, is a sudden thread convo pops up and instantaneously a poster wants to wield that verse as a hammer to quell the other poster from pursuing personal thoughts on a given matter
-- Richard M. Nixon 1973
off to my fainting couch!
F___ Obama
F___ Clinton
F___ ISIS
F___ liberalism
No, its F___ American businesses, who have been taxed and regulated right across our borders by Trump's Democrat pals.
Count me completely unsurprised.
That's so Donald
You mean, his Mother's bible. He apparently doesn't have one of his own.
That wasn’t what I was saying. Just that a macho cowboy would not have been saying “Dang” or “Gadzooks!”
Actually it was Jimah that complained about Cruz not compromising.
Cruz has done precisely what he campaigned on for Senate.
Doing what one says they do..... since when is that not what conservatives have longed for?
Sure, pick on us Italians :)
you should then be able to pick locks, sneak a vending machine out of NJ and scratch off the VIN, run numbers, and charge 2 points a week on a loan.
Or you went to the wrong school :)
Are you thinking Rubberio or any of the lessors have any chance?
Not I. Its down to either a common sense dedicated real conservative who lives up to campaign promises and respectfully honors both the Constitution and the Office of the President or the guy who has a difficult time controlling his emotions, promises the world and has a very questionable record of being even a ‘relatively moderate’ compromise king.
I am not looking for a swash-buckling bully for President, who indeed may turn on the very people who elect him.
As someone who despises illegals, Rubio’s waffling on that issue alone makes him unacceptable to me, even if he showed some real cojones-which he does not-we have a gutless fool in the WH now-do we really want someone else who won’t stand up to the likes of ISIS or Iran?
I personally prefer Cruz-not just because of my Latino ancestry or Texas roots-he is articulate enough to have argued successfully before the supreme court, he understands the constitution, and is in favor of limiting or getting rid of the topheavy and restrictive agencies-IRS and EPA, et al-and he has a reputation here for having balls of titanium.
If-heaven forbid-for any reason Cruz can’t grab the nomination, Trump is certainly preferable to any of the others-at least he is serious about terrorism and illegals...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.