Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I have heard about this technology for a while especially post-Fukushima. Looks like China is once again taking a technology that was developed in the West and going full production while the original ideas stalled in the bureaucratic NIMBY West.
1 posted on 02/12/2016 7:12:14 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: C19fan

So if’n a reactor melted down in China, would it still be called the ‘China Syndrome’?


2 posted on 02/12/2016 7:15:27 AM PST by rottndog ('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Yep. I feel the same way, and have been looking at that technology for many years, wondering if we would take global leadership.

But, no.


3 posted on 02/12/2016 7:18:39 AM PST by rlmorel ("Irrational violence against muslims" is a myth, but "Irrational violence against non-muslims" isn't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Wow! What a triumph of technology. Next they will be building an unsinkable ship. Oh wait...


4 posted on 02/12/2016 7:19:31 AM PST by NRx ( Keep Cool with Coolidge in 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
We will NEVER know ANY truth coming from China. They say and do ONLY what's best for them and to H*** with the rest of the world.

Nothing new here.

6 posted on 02/12/2016 7:29:22 AM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

This will be built by the people who had a hiway bridge fall over when opened for truck traffic.

Use this as a search string to see the photos

August 24th and Harbin Yangmingtan Bridge

what could possibly go wrong?


7 posted on 02/12/2016 7:33:57 AM PST by ASOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

8 posted on 02/12/2016 7:48:20 AM PST by ojeffers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

The way things are going the whole idea of a power plant will become a myth in the US ... something we will have in common with North Korea.


9 posted on 02/12/2016 7:56:52 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
The US was funding research in pebble bed nuclear reactors (Popular Mechanics discussed it in 2006), but apparently it was abandoned in 2012, according to wikipedia (Pebble Bed Modular Reactors).
11 posted on 02/12/2016 8:35:46 AM PST by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

There are two real problems with basic high pressure nuclear reactors.
The major one is steam explosion.
This will meltdown any water cooled reactor independent of safeguards.
This is what ultimately destroyed Chernobyl.
Cause was a design flaw in the control rods and operator error.

The second is the High Power in most big plants.

On a SCRAM, new energy generation slows but there is still residual energy in the system.
The higher the power output at SCRAM, the longer the cooling pumps need to run to prevent a meltdown.
Usually 2-5 days depending on the power output of the plant.

This is what killed Fukushima.
The external power to the plant failed.
A modern plant requires about 20Mw just to function.
They lost lights, pumps, controls...everything

Another plant 20 miles down the coast had the same SCRAM but never lost external power.


13 posted on 02/12/2016 9:11:52 AM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Westinghouse’s design teams here in the US have proposals and plans to build these reactors here, but they can’t get approval to do so.


15 posted on 02/12/2016 9:26:56 AM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Back in 1972, as a new engineer, I worked for a company called General Atomic, which had built small High Temperature Gas Cooler reactors, and had over a dozen contracts for full-sized units.

All the contracts were cancelled over the course of a few years due to regulatory uncertainties. Essentially the government could change the design rules in new and extremely expensive ways on a whim.

The national security implications of these cancellations were entirely foreseeable at the time, since that was also the time of the Arab oil embargo, gas rationing, and the doubling and tripling of gas prices.

But, even then, the environmental weenies felt that nuclear was evil, the government could do no wrong, and there was no regulation which was too onerous. “Industry” must bear the cost of every new regulation. I moved on to another job in a different field...


16 posted on 02/12/2016 9:46:49 AM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

More ChiComm propaganda.

The ChiComm apes still can’t float a second-hand carrier out of dry dock. They’ve bought four since 1985. When the 50 IQ pilots tried to land on the carrier, they crashed holes below the waterline.

As long as ChiComm apes are in control of China, the country will continue to sink into the muck.


18 posted on 02/12/2016 4:29:04 PM PST by sergeantdave ( If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson