Posted on 02/18/2016 2:53:59 PM PST by Hillary'sMoralVoid
They seem very much alike in behavior and style. Did Minnesotans get what they thought they elected?
Yes they cleaned up the tongue action
Jesse had a radio talk show, and had a lot of libertarian and even conservative views. He got a lot of support form blue-collar Reagan Democrat types. Once in office, he acted like a liberal Democrat except on a couple of issues.
http://www.radiotapes.com/kqrs.html
http://www.radiotapes.com/KQRS/KQRS-FM_Jesse_Mission_Accomplished.mp3
TRUMP’S ambiguous position on Israel and Palestine is troublesome. Trump won’t choose sides between Israel and Palestine.
I will only vote for a Presidential candidate who understands the Biblical mandate given to Israel.
GENESIS 12:3 says: I will bless those who bless you, I will curse those who treat you with contempt, and all the peoples on earth will be blessed through you.
We must be sure that the next POTUS will be a trusted friend to Israel. My vote is for TED CRUZ!
yVetura ran a a hard core fiscal conservative who was going to go to St Paul and return the people’s tax money to them.Even had his campaing followers at all the sporting events the weend prior to the election telling them he was going to get their money back for them.
Went to St Paul and promptly decided he liked spending the people tax money on his pet causes.
Hmm Ventura’s campaign sound like the candidate this year who tells his cult like followers he is going to ride into DC and dictate his ideological based agenda to the “DC Cartel”.
A loser is a loser is a loser.
“VOTE FOR OUR GUY HE IS LESS EVIL” is your pathetic WEAK LOSER strategy now??? Really???? This is your best counter point to Trump? ROTFLMAO!
So,,, since you LOSE on the issues...., LOSE on the number of people at your rallies and LOSE in the polls. Let’s trash character!
That’s A DESPERATE LOSER strategy when you can’t win on anything else.
Thus, in your eyes people should vote for the Rat Establishment. Absolutely 100% pathetic!
Like I said, a loser is a loser and a loser.
This is the ugliest in 14 years.
The reason is that he only ran for one term.
Some think it is, some think it’s not. Btw, there is also video out there somewhere which depict basically the same thing.
Snicker....you’re still here you old blow hard?
;)
“but no 757”
I don’t think Jesse has the downpayment on a Cessna 150!
Get back to me when Trump sues Chris Kyle’s wife. Or climbs around Dallas sewers for the real JFK sniper pit.
It's well known that Donald Trump, a germaphobe, doesn't like shaking hands. Less well known is that when forced to shake hands, Trump has a very specific technique, one that various handshake websites refer to as "the pull in." Once Trump latches onto your hand, he will vigorously -- here's where the name comes in -- pull you in close to his body, as if your arm is the rope in a game of tug-of-war. Presumably some type of power-executive move Trump uses to demonstrate dominance over his handshaking partners, the pull-in is Trump's go-to handshake, regardless of whose hand he's shaking.http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2012/02/romney-trump-handshake.html
Trump is Trump, you either accept that or you don’t, but you do have to deal with it either way. If his numbers turnout right in SC and NV, he’ll be virtually unstoppable. So, if he wins, you’ll have to decide whether you will vote for him or whomever the dems come up with, Clinton-Bernie-Biden, depending on what scenario you believe.
Trump is far from the perfect candidate (a perfect candidate would agree with me 100 percent), but we know that the others, being professional politicians, will do what professional politicians have always done, which is nothing positive. At least with Trump there is the POSSIBILITY of something completely different. We know that he won’t be able to get everything he’s talked about accomplished, but even if he gets some of it accomplished, it would be steps in the right direction.
We’ve had too many lawyers turned politicians, it’s time to give someone new a chance.
“I always thought conservatives were at least capable of rational, objective and thoughtful commentary...but there is a handful here who have caused me to reconsider.”
Aw come on Ron! When there’s this caliber of turd floating in the punchbowl, someone needs to take a shot at it!
And what almost always happens is you'll get the third cousin of the speaker heading one agency, the sister-in-law of a congressman, etc, etc, etc.
As Trump has at his fingerprints the system developed to pick applicants for the Apprentice program which can sort through tens of thousands of applications and resumes, I would expect that at least half of those positions would actually be filled with people qualified to do their appointed job. And more important, without the connections that will keep them from being fired if they are bad at it.
I honestly think that JUST that is more than enough to gamble on Trump. These same people would more likely promote people based on their merits rather than who they are related to. Which means these appointments could have long lasting impacts across the executive branch.
Yes, I know people are more concerned with the big show, as it were, but for me, I want Washington reformed, and to me, this is the only option available. I have zero confidence that Cruz would make such efforts, and apparently federal workers agree with my assessment, since 20% of them have reported in a survey that they'd abandon their job if Trump was elected.
If you examine it closely, it is.
I don’t defend Bush and his relationship with the Saud’s, I just hate seeing the same pics the DU types used to use to attack him.
Only a moron would think shaking hands with thousands of people would be a wise thing to do all the time.
I am not a Trump fan, but I think you can not deny he has direction ambition forethought and confidence and a huge pedigree of decision making with great levels of wide spread effects.
I was speaking to the former assistant director of the CIA once and he pointed out that the difference between your grand parents or great grandparents is the amount of decisions they made a year. Their biggest decisions they may make in a year was should i plant corn or wheat this year.... They did not make thousands of decisions that have wide spread effect on our lives or others daily. He said that is a very significant difference in who we are. If you take that to a macro level, and ask...are those who are running for office experienced in making hard multifaceted decisions and do that with reasonable successful effect.
So I would ask.... of all he candidates which has that level of experience? Then think about over the last 100 years which had the most experience making decisions ?
Lots of people have looked, some think it’s legitimate, some not. Again, video exists of basically the same thing, including holding hands routine at some Saudi garden party.
I rest my case, thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.