Apparently you didn’t listen to Rush a couple-three days ago. How is ANY vote based on emotion and feeling any less valid that some rigid ideologue’s tainted view, or that of a staid and rigid, persnickety contrarian?
The FACT is that just because you or your colleagues can’t make a countermanding case to that emotion isn’t a reflection of the emotional fault. It is the fault of your argument, your backhanded and cowardly means of attack, and your inability to convince others.
See you next Wednesday if you want to discuss further.
Your entire posting is specious on several levels.