Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CyberAnt
The very fact that you don’t know the law well enough to understand that a child born of AN AMERICAN CITIZEN (even when said Citizen is not in the USA), the child is still automatically a citizen.

There is no precedent being set.

Oh, stuff it! I am not alone in my justifiable opinion and your candidate clearly has a fatal handicap. I attempted to reach out to you in a gesture of goodwill. You sound like a fool to not even discuss it.

Let me show you the precedent. Suppose Cruz is nominated and elected. A few years from now a Muslim man in Saudi Arabia heavily in the oil industry takes an American wife. They travel back to the middle east and a child is born. By your flawed view he is considered a Natural Born American. The child, raised by his father as violently anti-American but comes back here, runs a flawless campaign with lies and deceit and is elected. This candidate could not be stopped because of the precedent set by Cruz. According to their arcane rules, if a Islamic is leader of a country it must become an Islamic nation. The destruction of The USA is at hand, and it is your hand.

101 posted on 03/04/2016 8:03:29 PM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! - voted Trump 2016 & Dude, Cruz ain't bona fide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: higgmeister; CyberAnt
Biggmeister:

We have survived now for more than seven years of that situation under Obozo but he got elected without his father being millionaire or even a competent human being. I would not be surprised to learn that his father was sooooo "anti-colonialist" as to have become a practicing member of the machete-wielding Mau Mau before being killed while DUI. The precedent has already been set. People get what most of them or their chosen electors vote for. No system is perfect. There are many precedents as to candidates before Obozo as well. The courts, in light of Obozo and the commitment of our court system against Birther Nation's fantasies, are NOT going to rule as you wish. The rulings may say: The process were not properly served or filed or did not name a plaintiff with standing or we are not wasting time on this nonsense or your request is denied but the request WILL BE denied under whatever rubric.

Far better to work hard to elect your candidate and to defeat candidates you do not like than to ask courts of all things to exert lightning from the sky on behalf of anything perceived as a conservative election cause so that you can call down the zot on those you don't want from your easy chair.

Ted Cruz is not a Muslim. Marco Rubio is not a Muslim. If Obozo is a Muslim, even he has not tried to implement Sharia "Law." Barry Goldwater was not a Muslim (a baby-killing enthusiast but not a Muslim). George Romney was not a Muslim. He was probably left of Bernie Sanders and a Natural Born Mexican by Birther standards and STILL better than his son Moral Monster Mitt but neither is/was Muslim.

Any candidate can be defeated by rounding up enough votes for his opponent(s). I wanted Scott Walker but he was one of the first casualties (and not because of the magnificent job he has done as Wisconsin governor). I wanted Ted Cruz ad he may well not be nominated. As things stand, I can provisionally plan to vote for Trump in November unless I am badly alienated.

Birthers need a new set of priorities.

106 posted on 03/04/2016 8:38:31 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society: Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson