[Bobalu]

Sadly, the MSM and many online sources are actively suppressing this story!

FR seems to be flirting with the same suppression...sad

This is news because it is growing so huge...even if it is untrue in its entirety.

The John Edwards NE story was freely published on websites everywhere... why was that OK and this is not?

Funny that the FR caucus is overwhelmingly in favor of Trump but only scandalous stories about Trump seem to get published?

IMO this story is quite dubious, but I am against censorship.

[Solson]

If it’s dubious then Cruz better come out swinging very hard.

[Solson]

Not sure why FR is pulling every last thread on this. It's a news story across the board. If it was not gaining steam and was a cuckoo site without any veracity, it would be one thing.

Should NE be taken as a highly accurate source? No.

Have they been right before? Absolutely. http://www.businessinsider.com/national-enquirer-stories-that-were-true-2013-2?op=1