She’s technically correct, which is why the only viable solution for a functioning society is for ALL welfare systems to be 100% eliminated. In no manner should federal, state, or local governments be permitted to hand out cash in any shape or form.
So here’s what I was wondering about:
Given that no one likes or wants the choke hold we feel wrt current gov’t corruption, and no one wants violent revolution to restore our country back to its cherished foundations; how would you evaluate the effectiveness of 100% of the population utilizing the welfare system as a “restorative tool”?
Am I wrong to speculate that the system would collapse given the absence of producers? I wonder what would the rulers would do the?
I also thought that we don’t really have to do anything because it will collapse on its own, eventually.
What do ya’ll think?