So, you intend to support Trump as the GOP nominee in November, am I correct?
"The rest of you are only worth about 110, but I'll take it...
All right, let's dance!"
Posted on 04/24/2016 2:58:24 AM PDT by markomalley
I've started to see Breitbart host more and more pro-Cruz propaganda items on their sites. If they're going to continue posting anti-Trump lies and deception, they should go the way of "Right Scoop" and not be allowed to be posted on this site.
For example, this morning I come across a scurrilous piece by Dr Susan Berry, Donald Trump Foundation Donated $20K to Public School LGBT Activist Group GLSEN. Not saying that it's true, but even if it was, since when would Donald Trump have day-to-day management control on each and every donation made. Besides, it was 4 years ago. What relevance is this to today?
This just shows that it may not be a reliable news source any longer. I think articles from this source should be banned from FR.
So, you intend to support Trump as the GOP nominee in November, am I correct?
"The rest of you are only worth about 110, but I'll take it...
All right, let's dance!"
I post that challenge back to you.
Will you support the nominee if it is not Donald Trump?
I’m very certain you couldn’t identify satire if you were alone with it in a bright room and it bit you in the ass.
There is no other explanation for your clueless post.
“People who think Cruz is going to win on any ballot are not too smart.”
Just hypothetically, since it is within the realm of possibilities. I’ll happily pull the lever for Trump, will everybody here do likewise for Cruz?
Answer the question NOW. Will you support Donald Trump as the GOP nominee in November?
"Well? We're waiting!"
Answer your own question, grifter. You are long overdue for the zot.
Let me explain something to you nice and clear. You aren’t in a position to give me orders, and if you were in closer proximity I’d explain that more clearly to you.
Per your overwhelming desire to know my mind, why don’t you make use of the FR search function and read exactly what I’ve posted, it’s all there for those not too lazy to read it.
Finally, do you tag Jim Robinson on all your posts, or am I supposed to be super impressed?
The subject of this thread was a proposal to ban sources, articles, etc. that show insufficient fervor for Trump. My posts have addressed my opinion on the matter, your inability to understand satire duly noted.
Cheesy threat, Tedlim.
One more time, do you intend to support Trump as the GOP nominee in November, yes or no. Answer the question.
Jim, I don’t think StAnDeliver is going to stop tagging you on his posts to me until he gets a response from you. Apparently, tagging you while replying to me is intended as a threat.
Per this thread, I’ve posted that I think banning Brietbart is a bad idea.
You’ll have to ask StanAnDeliver exactly what he’s demanding of you, but I presume it is kicking me off of FR.
BTW, that's not satire.
Frankly, I'm enjoying a Trump afternoon in Maryland, maybe you should do the same:
"We put the Bible way up high/
And then we lie/
that's Ted Cruz
Ted Cruz is working really hard to bribe - and I don't want to use the word bribe - but to bribe, the delegates ..." -- Donald J. Trump, 4/24/2016
Are you?
The rest of your post was just gobbly gook. I don't have my decoder ring, so I don't have a clue what it meant, but I hope you feel better. FYI, you forgot to tag Jim Rob last time.
WTF? Is the Trump campaign really that weak? Can't take criticism?
Why do you think he called you a grifter?
It doesn’t even make sense within the realm of the accusation, which appears to be a challenge of insufficient fervor.
Have you moved from town town executing a series of con games?
I know satire escaped his understanding, but such a gross misuse of a word indicates a general lack of understanding.
I’m finding this more and more that I get insulted, but the insultor doesn’t even have a grasp of the insult they are using. Having to explain it to them is exhausting.
Will just up my monthly donation, and castigate you when you're gone.
I freely admit I enjoyed aiding erasing Arator and the Buchananites and their fellow travelers like Vallandigham some years ago; unfortunately #Tedlimination has been remarkably less compelling.
In fact, I'd bring back Arator in a trade for you and any Liberty Forum dumbass to be named later. You Tedlims can't even find the plate...
Did we do this crap in 2000? 2004? 2008? 2012? Why would we do it now? A lot of us held our nose and voted for Bush, Romney and McCain. But that doesn’t mean we had to kiss their ring. I recall a lot of anti-McCain and anti-Romney posts.
You couldn’t vacate a bowel by yourself.
You most certainly aren’t up to tossing me anywhere.
Well said. Principles over politics, no matter when. If we discard what it is we’re supposed to be about - individual liberty, self-determination, the Constitution - “just this one time,” who’s to say whether it will still be there and recognizable after “just this one time” has passed?
Just as Sean Hannity has said many, many times to the leftie callers to his show: Don’t insult or attack. Defend your positions.
Amen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.