Granted China is (way) behind Russia and America in nuclear technology, in some ways.
But, they are rapidly progressing.
1 posted on
05/19/2016 5:47:20 AM PDT by
cba123
To: cba123
2 posted on
05/19/2016 5:47:34 AM PDT by
cba123
(http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html)
To: cba123
We have a lot of catching up to do.
3 posted on
05/19/2016 5:49:31 AM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
To: cba123
How much were the Chinese helped by the Clinton
transfer of IP for $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
(including the pending applications at the USPTO)?
4 posted on
05/19/2016 5:52:44 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
To: cba123
Power in the hands of non-Muslims. Not all bad.
5 posted on
05/19/2016 5:53:53 AM PDT by
samtheman
(Trump For America.)
To: cba123
“But, they are rapidly progressing.”
Thanks to Bill Clinton. He is said to have jumped them 25 years ahead in exchange for campaign cash. That use to be called treason.
6 posted on
05/19/2016 6:00:55 AM PDT by
odawg
To: cba123
what a choice of words!
Chinas Nuclear Subs Are Ready to Terrorize the Sea (Now Russia, America and China)
Are Russia, America and China terrorising the sea? Really? With boomers? 'Terrorising the sea' must be pirating or something like that.
To: cba123
“Granted China is (way) behind Russia and America in nuclear technology, in some ways.”
How advanced do nuclear weapons have to be to inflict a lot of damage?
10 posted on
05/19/2016 6:20:29 AM PDT by
NRx
(Self Censored)
To: cba123
Interestingly, there's a SONAR tech in Pearl Harbor that listens to the movements of EVERY Chinese sub from the time it leaves port to the time it returns.
And pinpoints it's location.
They are that loud.
11 posted on
05/19/2016 6:33:58 AM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: cba123
If a nation has nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them, that nation is pretty much immune from attack. I.E., North Korea and soon to be Iran.
12 posted on
05/19/2016 6:57:44 AM PDT by
buckalfa
(I am feeling much better now.)
To: cba123
I am not at all concerned about subs. They can be easily tracked and killed so they are a waste of time and money. I am concerned about a volley of ICBMs that we cannot defeat in any way. We can only hope to take them out before they are launched, but in a mass attack scenario we have zero defenses. China is building out their ICBM fleet with some pretty capable missiles.
14 posted on
05/19/2016 7:12:50 AM PDT by
CodeToad
(Islam should be banned and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
To: cba123
Another “benefit” of Free Trade coming to fruition.
18 posted on
05/19/2016 7:42:52 AM PDT by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Jeff Head; cva66snipe; EternalVigilance
20 posted on
05/19/2016 7:46:09 AM PDT by
StoneWall Brigade
( America's Party! The Party of the Republic Vote Tom Hoefling/Steve Schulin 2016)
To: cba123
But, they are rapidly progressing. Not if the Type 94's are any indication There is no streamlining in that hull design. It's likely to be noisier than all get out and not at all hard to track when compared with the SSBMs from other countries.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson