Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dilbert San Diego

The Constitution is silent on it.

Use reason here. If states don’t have the option to leave, their people are not free.

Why would it be acceptable for an Estonia, Ukraine, Caledonia, Scotland, or Quebec to leave their unions, but not, say, a Delaware?


60 posted on 06/24/2016 7:10:03 PM PDT by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: ReaganGeneration2

>>Why would it be acceptable for an Estonia, Ukraine, Caledonia, Scotland, or Quebec to leave their unions, but not, say, a Delaware?<<

They are not part of the USA and governed by the USC AND they continue to operate as countries, just countries that have pledged fealty to an Emperor.

When a territory joins the US it says “this is now a State.” No more, no less than any other and the history becomes legally irrelevant. A country that joins the EU continues to be a country, it just promises to adhere to a bunch of rules and regulations shared by other countries.


67 posted on 06/24/2016 7:15:06 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Don't mistake my silence for ignorance, my calmness for acceptance, or my kindness for weakness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: ReaganGeneration2

You make a good point. I’m thinking there would not be military force used nowadays to force a state to stay in the union. We won’t know what would happen if a state tried to secede, until some state actually does so.

It will be interesting to see if secessionist movements gain traction in any states in the years ahead. So far there have not been any serious moves in that direction.


72 posted on 06/24/2016 7:17:44 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson