Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Vanity] Could repeal of Second Amendment be a breach of contract?

Posted on 06/27/2016 3:06:31 AM PDT by Jonty30

If, under a Hilary government, the Second Amendment was read out of the Constitution or Amended to be null and void, could the South leave?

Those who joined the Union did so with the Constitution as it was written at the time, so those were agreed upon terms. However, it seems to me that a repeal of the Second Amendment represents a change to the contract, needing all parties to agree to the change or it becomes a breach and allows parties to decide to stay or not.

Am I wrong?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 last
To: gundog

It is still the amendment process. The rights we all have been given by God are inalienable. The same rights can and will be taken by force if evil men decide they are in charge.

But if evil men decide they are in charge, it is because they do not know or understand God.

But the amendment process is man-made and if evil men decide to amend the amendment, it will be amended.

God’s law can not be amended. Count on that.


81 posted on 06/28/2016 2:55:30 PM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

They don’t have to repeal the 2nd Amd. If Hillary wins and selects the next supreme court justice and probably another two or three along the way in the next four to probably eight years, there is no need for a repeal. They will rewrite all the laws using the supreme court. They will throw away all the gun laws to support doing away with the amendment without having to do a thing to the Bill of Rights. This election will destroy the nation once and for all if she gets in the White House. The supreme court controlled by the liberals will see to that. THAT is what this election is about. The next justice and those that will be selected in the next few years.


82 posted on 06/28/2016 3:01:52 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (Read 1 Corinthians 15: verses 1-4. This is the Gospel of Grace, the ONLY WAY TO BE SAVED!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

I do not believe there is any need to determine the legality of secession anymore. The federal government has ignored federal law and the Constitution for decades, and behaves as if no legal boundaries exist. Furthermore, federal law is selectively applied and used in a inconsistent and even criminal fashion. Elements of the government are used to punish political opponents and create fear among its critics. By ignoring, and misusing the Constitution and the law, the federal government has given the people the justification for secession. The federal government has, thus, self identified itself as a tyrannical enterprise. It is the natural, God given right of the people to rid themselves of tyranny, and God’s law is far superior to the laws of man. Secession seems a proper way to shake off the shackles of tyranny, and if there needs to be a fight then let there be a fight.


83 posted on 06/28/2016 3:36:55 PM PDT by Jay Redhawk (Diversity for the sake of diversity is just flat out stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson