Americans are about to get the first landslide president we don’t want

nypost.com ^ | 8/20/16 | Kyle Smith

[elcid1970]

“...but she’ll only win because of a few states and perhaps won’t even get the popular vote....”

If that happens there will be talk of rebellion. Not so much by militias, but by states who will see their respective constitutions as the only remaining guardians of the Bill of Rights.

[Calvin Locke]

You don't have to read the article, just the caption of the picture at the top of the article.

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Current polls show Clinton may be elected by a margin in the "wide" to "vast" range.

[wastoute]

I admit, I don’t get out much...

[exDemMom]

It is pretty bad when the elitists’ pick has to be hidden from the public in order to get them to vote for her.

The reason we keep hearing over and over how unlikeable and unstable Trump is, is that Hillary truly is nasty and dangerous, and the media must convince us that Trump is worse. But if the public actually sees her, convincing us that Trump is worse becomes almost impossible.

[Political Junkie Too]

It depends on the meaning of the word "we."

-PJ

[A CA Guy]

He was a great one.
White House recorded him talking about giving welfare to nig%$# so they would vote Democrat for 200 years.

[Hot Tabasco]

the first landslide president we don’t want

I think Kyle Smith has a little special person hiding in his pocket........

[wild74]

He probably reads and listens to the media also, why should he know any difference....As long as the Trump voters don’t buy into it

[perfect_rovian_storm]

It is impossible to find ‘evidence’ of something that hasn’t occurred yet. You can find data. You can examine the data for trends, but you cannot and will never find ‘evidence’ or ‘proof’ of something that hasn’t happened yet.

So, either you are foolishly looking for something that you can’t find OR you’re trying to con the rest of us with a concern troll trip about needing ‘evidence’ that can never possibly exist.

Which is it, Mr UberTrumpSupporter?

[tumblindice]

There is a disturbance in the Force.

[scouter]

I feel no need to defend myself against your snide insinuations. If you really want to know which I am, do your own research.

[sergeantdave]

“However, what I don’t see anywhere is any EVIDENCE (i.e., DATA) that he is likely to do so.”

I notice that you don’t provide a scintilla of evidence that Hillary will win. IOW, you’re blowing smoke out your ass, Soros troll.

[JoeFromSidney]

If you want Trump to win by the grace of God, start praying that God will spare us from Hillary.

For all I know, Hillary may be God's punishment on us, but prayer can't hurt and may help.

[publius911]

Americans are about to get the first landslide president we don’t want

Yeah.

Damned voters, not voting the way they are ordered!

And damned Democratic politicians! Even with their hired thug mobs, unable to persuade their constituency to vote the right way!

What have we come to?

< /s >

[publius911]

[Voting Fraud] The only question is to what extent.

And how long it will take to unravel and prosecute...

Incidentally, the absolutely dumbest suggestion by the clueless Trump supporters...
Wear red to help prevent voter fraud. Are these people totally brain dead?
Red is a gang color in California. All my red golf shirts or other shirts are never worn in public any more.

I value my life, and, no, I am not kidding.

[publius911]

You've got to get out more if you think that Kyle Smith is a "libtard" -- or that Trump will win by a landslide.

Are we in agreement that if Trump wins, your job as an undercover libtard troll in FR is over?

[combat_boots]

Well played

[publius911]

You can examine the data for trends, but you cannot and will never find ‘evidence’ or ‘proof’ of something that hasn’t happened yet.

But... but... but...

The libtards and the MSM dingdongs use that imbecile technique every day!

Whaddaya mean it doesn't work???

[sport]

I believe you. Some people just like to talk without understanding what they say.

[scouter]

I don’t know why you’re attacking me. I’m on your side. I hope Trump wins and I’m going to vote for him and try to get others to do so so, too. I was commenting on the article posted. I never said Hillary would win. If you take a closer look, I only said that none of us knows who is really ahead, at least in the states that will decide the election.

Don’t blame me if there’s no data to support the belief, or hope, that Trump will win. I hope he does. I just haven’t seen the evidence that he will. Nor have I seen the evidence that Hillary will. And don’t be so quick to label people as your enemy just because you may disagree with a point or two of their argument. This is a discussion forum. Not everyone who has a different opinion from yours, or interprets the available data differently from you is a troll.