Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Benchmarks from Apple’s next-gen processor just leaked and it’s scary how powerful it is
BGR ^ | Oct 4, 2016 at 5:11 PM | By Zach Epstein

Posted on 10/05/2016 7:41:04 PM PDT by Swordmaker


Apple’s new iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus are far and away the most powerful smartphones the world has seen thus far. In terms of both raw benchmark test scores on paper and real-world performance, Apple’s latest mobile devices outshine every other phone on the market. In fact, they’re even more powerful than Apple’s latest iPad Pro tablets, which is no small feat.

As powerful as they already are though, Apple is constantly working on next-generation products, looking to make them better and faster than their predecessors. Now, it looks like benchmark tests from Apple’s next-gen processor have leaked, revealing huge performance gains that are somehow even more impressive than what we just saw from the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus.

DON’T MISS: iPhone 7 vs. Galaxy S7 blind camera test: Guess which model hardcore Apple fans picked

Dutch gadget blog Techtastic points us to a potentially huge leak sourced on Weibo, where an anonymous user with a solid track record has published what he claims are Geekbench benchmark test scores from Apple’s A10X. The next-gen chip has not yet been revealed by Apple, but it will presumably power the company’s upcoming new iPad Pro tablets expected to be released early next year.

As a refresher, the iPhone 7’s new A10 Fusion chipset manages impressive scores of 3490 in single-core Geekbench tests and 5580 in multi-core tests. How does the A10X compare? According to this leak, Apple’s upcoming A10X scored 4236 on Geekbench’s single-core test and a ridiculous 6588 on the multi-core test. Those numbers would be off the charts if Techtastic hadn’t charted them (click to enlarge):

screen-shot-2016-10-04-at-4-03-46-pm

One last note: Beyond showing us how impressive Apple’s next-gen A10X chip seemingly is, one can follow the curve to get a good idea of just how incredibly powerful the A11 Fusion chip that powers next year’s iPhone 8 will likely be.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: a10xprocessor; applepinglist; benchmarks; iphone7; skynet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Swordmaker

You do good and your efforts are appreciated.


21 posted on 10/05/2016 8:25:19 PM PDT by Gator113 ( Go Trump, Go! Just livin' life my way. Don't worry, everything's gonna be alright. 👍 &#1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

bookmark


22 posted on 10/05/2016 8:25:28 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Can it play pokeymans Go without draining my damned battery?

Probably yes, if you play it responsibly and don't do it in heavy traffic.

Probably not a good idea to play on 50 and Bradshaw at rush hour, huh?

23 posted on 10/05/2016 8:27:10 PM PDT by Mark17 (Calvary's love has never faltered. All it's wonder still remains. Souls still take eternal passage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
So, the blog put together an extensive photo comparison test that differs in one key way from similar comparisons you’ll see around the web: it was blind. The site captured similar photos using the iPhone 7, Galaxy S7, LG V20 and Microsoft Lumia 950, and it posted them on its site with no indication of which device captured each photo. Then, it asked users to choose the photo with the best quality for each scene.

With more than 13,000 votes tallied, can you guess which camera these Apple enthusiasts picked as the winner? If you surmised by now that they didn’t pick the iPhone, you’re correct — Samsung’s Galaxy S7 camera ended up coming out on top.

Interesting! This is from the link to photo testing in the middle of your post. So the Samsung S7 camera is better than the iPhone camera, after a survey of iPhone users. So the S7 has the better camera, too!

24 posted on 10/05/2016 8:32:10 PM PDT by Shanghai Dan (I ride a GS scooter with my hair cut neat...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

It will always be 50 to 100 years in the future.

I attended an AI session at Dreamforce in San Francisco today. They panel said it’s 50 to 100 years away.

Salesforce is building AI into all of their products now. Remains to be seen if it actually does anything useful.


25 posted on 10/05/2016 8:36:17 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

I carry an iPhone for work, an Android for personal. I carry one set of Apple buds because they work the best for call quality and volume control on the iPhone while still working well on my android (less the volume control). However, they do not hold up well over time. I can show you receipts for replacement buds but not sure you’ll believe me or care.


26 posted on 10/05/2016 8:36:34 PM PDT by MountainWalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet

Thanks


27 posted on 10/05/2016 8:40:24 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Thanks for the pings Sword...


28 posted on 10/05/2016 8:50:36 PM PDT by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Shanghai Dan
Interesting! This is from the link to photo testing in the middle of your post. So the Samsung S7 camera is better than the iPhone camera, after a survey of iPhone users. So the S7 has the better camera, too!

People always go for the overly saturated colors, thinking that's what makes a good photograph. It doesn't.

29 posted on 10/05/2016 9:00:09 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
People always go for the overly saturated colors, thinking that's what makes a good photograph. It doesn't.

If people like it, then why isn't it good? Photography, art in general, is preference based. If it's not the "most realistic" but it's what people prefer, then that is "correct".

Perception and preference are subjective things - and in the big scheme of things, that's what matters.

30 posted on 10/05/2016 9:03:52 PM PDT by Shanghai Dan (I ride a GS scooter with my hair cut neat...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MountainWalker

Try the Klipsch, they’re nice.


31 posted on 10/05/2016 9:06:14 PM PDT by Kommodor (Terrorist, Journalist or Democrat? I can't tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

Good call.


32 posted on 10/05/2016 9:24:06 PM PDT by Mark17 (Calvary's love has never faltered. All it's wonder still remains. Souls still take eternal passage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kommodor; MountainWalker

Also the AKG K 376. IF they fit you, they actually sound pretty good and are quite robust.


33 posted on 10/05/2016 9:24:09 PM PDT by Shanghai Dan (I ride a GS scooter with my hair cut neat...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Kommodor

I have a pair of Klipschs but they’re too long and snag easier, mic dangles lower (below my shirt neckline if I try to prevent it from snagging by routing the wire under my shirt) and controls are on the left side for some reason. And I get a lot of complaints about being able to hear me on the other end (even when the mic isn’t buried in my shirt).


34 posted on 10/05/2016 9:31:41 PM PDT by MountainWalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

35 posted on 10/05/2016 10:57:47 PM PDT by HonkyTonkMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

bookmark


36 posted on 10/05/2016 11:04:14 PM PDT by nutmeg (I am a proud Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MCH
Lemme guess. It’ll have all new power cables and connectors, all new USB cables & connectors, and all new accessories. So, you can’t reuse anything at all from previous models.

Only if you actually buy one, which you won't.

37 posted on 10/05/2016 11:09:19 PM PDT by itsahoot (GOP says, Vote Trump. But if your principles won't let you, Hillary is OK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HonkyTonkMan

LOL...It is you that is making all the noise. You’re being a fool.


38 posted on 10/06/2016 12:02:34 AM PDT by Gator113 ( Go Trump, Go! Just livin' life my way. Don't worry, everything's gonna be alright. 👍 &#1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MountainWalker

I have the ICom for my hearing aids so the Doppler stays in my bag. Love the new “7”!


39 posted on 10/06/2016 2:33:44 AM PDT by Shady (We are at war again......this time for our lives...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MCH
Lemme guess. It’ll have all new power cables and connectors, all new USB cables & connectors, and all new accessories. So, you can’t reuse anything at all from previous models.

Probably. It's one of Apple's ways of generating profit for the entire ecosystem. I must say though, that the lightning connector is what a usb cable should be. Orientation shouldn't matter for these types of connectors. I would also note that the USB connector has seen many changes over the years as well.

40 posted on 10/06/2016 7:00:53 AM PDT by zeugma (Welcome to the "interesting times" you were warned about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson