Isn't this illegal?
1 posted on
10/11/2016 6:56:26 AM PDT by
C19fan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: C19fan
Great way to ruin your business...
To: C19fan
To: C19fan
4 posted on
10/11/2016 6:58:06 AM PDT by
uncitizen
(JFK: The first victim of the New World Order)
To: C19fan
And that will help the stated aims how?
5 posted on
10/11/2016 6:58:06 AM PDT by
ScaniaBoy
(Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
To: C19fan
Just waiting for the going out of business signs to go up.
To: C19fan
Seems like the “officially approved” version of sexual prejudice and harassment.
Gee, loving liberals don’t hate much, do they?
7 posted on
10/11/2016 6:58:37 AM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: C19fan
Isn't this illegal?
Only if you aren't allowed to to identify as a woman at the time of purchase. Gender binaries are so 2008.
8 posted on
10/11/2016 6:58:45 AM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: C19fan
Men shouldn’t shop there anymore
I wonder if they can stay in business if they automatically lost half of their business?
Retail depends on the numbers
9 posted on
10/11/2016 6:59:30 AM PDT by
arl295
To: C19fan
I guess they can put whatever charges they want to on purchases. One restaurant added a charge for what they pay waitstaff’s health insurance. I don’t expect this pharmacy to stay in business much longer with that policy.
10 posted on
10/11/2016 6:59:53 AM PDT by
SkyDancer
(Ambtion Without Talent Is Sad - Talent Without Ambition Is Worse)
To: C19fan
Let’s get some photos of the men who continue to buy from this place.
You’ll see what a real metrosexual looks like
11 posted on
10/11/2016 6:59:59 AM PDT by
PGR88
To: C19fan
It meets the definition of sex/gender discrimination. But it is “fighting” gender inequality and a ‘dangerous’ Republican, thus is “politically correct” & with liberal judges probably legal.
12 posted on
10/11/2016 7:00:05 AM PDT by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: C19fan
“manhattan pharmacy run out of business after lame feminism stunt”
You read it here first, folks.
CC
13 posted on
10/11/2016 7:00:12 AM PDT by
Celtic Conservative
(CC: purveyor of cryptic, snarky posts since December, 2000..)
To: C19fan
Very much illegal.
Time to slap this place with a “going out of business” tax.
To: C19fan
This woman would certainly not shop there!
15 posted on
10/11/2016 7:01:04 AM PDT by
Wneighbor
(I'm deplorable.)
To: C19fan
In a high tax state and city like New York that will not go down well and the Legality of that is in serious doubt. Sounds like a good lawsuit and of course business loss will be a factor. Pharmacies are a dime a dozen in this world and you can bet their competitors will offer a lot to change over.
To: C19fan
Interesting question. Can a business tax different groups/categories at a whim?
18 posted on
10/11/2016 7:04:04 AM PDT by
rod1
(CTLY)
To: C19fan
Which one? Breitbart screws up my computer.
22 posted on
10/11/2016 7:05:54 AM PDT by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Muslims)
To: C19fan
WOW. A pharmacy powerful enough to create their own taxes.
Congress can go home now.
23 posted on
10/11/2016 7:06:24 AM PDT by
IC Ken
To: C19fan
Maybe this is Representative of the Taxes Hillary Will Impose on the Middle Class and the Rest of Us??
To: C19fan
26 posted on
10/11/2016 7:07:24 AM PDT by
Lorianne
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson