Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

There’s no change in the way the course has been run.

BS Meter on high level.

1 posted on 10/27/2016 11:56:56 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: C19fan

Women officers in combat zones? Likely to be either overly rigid, or wildly erratic.

Just my opinion as a lifelong civilian.


2 posted on 10/27/2016 12:05:18 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Women are biologically, genetically, socially and culturally not programmed to be leaders and even more so not programmed to lead men in battle.


3 posted on 10/27/2016 12:09:04 PM PDT by Az Joe (Desu Hoc Vult!! The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
"The U.S. Army’s first gender-integrated infantry office course..."

"Get me a cuppa coffee, will ya babe?"

(I know...that was bad.)

4 posted on 10/27/2016 12:19:18 PM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

My son recently finished boot camp and combat training in the Marines, and he said along with others I spoke to the women are treated very differently and the women do not get the exact same workouts as the men do.


5 posted on 10/27/2016 12:19:59 PM PDT by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

“...who took the challenge.”

First tip off of article BS.


6 posted on 10/27/2016 12:24:12 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

8 posted on 10/27/2016 12:28:57 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Bull squat! Lord, I cannot imagine being assigned to a platoon and meeting my PL, and it’s a woman! I think I would laugh. Course my butt would be in a sling for a bit. Or having a new PL assigned and it’s a woman. Again, I would laugh, and this will do nothing but damage morale.


11 posted on 10/27/2016 12:34:39 PM PDT by vpintheak (Freedom is not equality; and equality is not freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

If women can meet the standards, then the standards are too low.


13 posted on 10/27/2016 12:38:09 PM PDT by Lexington Green (Why isn't Hillary in jail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

I claim BS too, unless they lowered the standards, can a woman carry incapacitated man out of of firefight? Give me a break. And if captured? we have to worry about rape and such adding more risk.


14 posted on 10/27/2016 12:38:27 PM PDT by Trump-a-licious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

I have no problem with women serving in combat units BUT if they cannot pass the same physical tests as men to do so then they shouldn’t be there. Some women (very few) will be able to do so, most won’t.


16 posted on 10/27/2016 12:40:46 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

How many men will they get killed?


19 posted on 10/27/2016 12:56:59 PM PDT by donna (Donald Trump is going to win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

My military days are very far back in my review mirror, but if I were active military in a combat unit under the leadership of a female officer, I am not certain I could serve without severe reservations.


24 posted on 10/27/2016 1:36:40 PM PDT by Robwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

“Many of the female officers will now move on to challenges that include Ranger school and Airborne school.”

Good luck with that. Airborne, maybe. Ranger School, I doubt it. The physical requirements are not suited for a woman’s body. They do not possess the upper body strength required for the job and cannot possess it based upon their body makeup and DNA. I assisted in training rangers for physical apptitude from 2001 till 2012 in my facilities.

red


27 posted on 10/27/2016 1:58:05 PM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

The ladies humped a forty-pound ruck ten miles?

I don’t think so.

I smell BS.


32 posted on 10/27/2016 3:14:10 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

“Many of the female officers will now move on to challenges that include Ranger school and Airborne school.”

This is a joke and an insult to our troops.


33 posted on 10/27/2016 3:21:21 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
feh,,,
34 posted on 10/27/2016 4:42:30 PM PDT by Chode (You Owe Them Nothing - Not Respect, Not Loyalty, Not Obedience, NOTHING! ich bin ein Deplorable...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

This is BS. I graduated Infantry School in 91. We had to do ten pullups just to go into the DFAC.

25 mile forced road march, full pack, full ammo load. WTF is going on?

I guess there was no pugil sticks between males and females, no ground fighting, no rifle PT.

This sickens me...


36 posted on 10/27/2016 6:52:30 PM PDT by Molon Labbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson