Posted on 11/04/2016 7:39:11 AM PDT by TigerClaws
Another question... What’s up with the dogs? I imagine that these photos on-line (as perverted as they are) are actually tame compared to her personal collection which she likely shares with friends like Podesta, Hillary and Mr. Wiener.
I just went on her website and have to say that these photos are very disturbing. Who of sane mind would not only take these photos but collect them. These Podesta guys are truly weird.
Isn’t Tony his brother?
Tony is the brother of John, lobbyist, founding partner of the Podesta Group...
SHOCK VIDEO: Jerusalem And God Get Booed At Dem Convention [2012]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2927075/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2927109/posts
That was Footnote [*4*] in satanic and KKK-level accusations against the Weiner-crat Party:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3489020/posts?page=47#47
~~~
... related ...
Weiner Ravages Hillary
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3487170/posts
Dark humor review of Hillary sleaze and numerous Clinton scandals.
Oh, thank you. Brother of John.
I spent only the required number of seconds on those sites to know damn straight well that these girls are being sexualized and no children should be posed like that period. I am thoroughly disgusted, even if Podesta has never touched a little girl that he feels these photos are ok to peruse or collect.
Sickening.
Not art. Not ok.
Rituals at John Podesta’s house? To what are you referring?
Not showing privates. But girls lying over the edge of a bed or half in a sink like dead, girls with hands over their (child) breasts looking helplessly at the camera. Girls with bright underwear under a see through dress. I have a little girl and she would never pose herself like any of these period. So this is the eye of a pedophile setting up the photos.
Sheesh...I cAnt even think of that as art
Creepy.
Podesta’s brother and SIL collect this crap?
J. Podesta, Weiner, Bill & Hill, Huma, Epstein, Pedophilia, it all fits.......................
Tony and Heather separated in 2013. Their art collection was part of the divorce bickering everyone in DC was talking about at the time. But they reached settlement in 2014.
https://www.washingtonian.com/2014/08/11/the-making-and-unmaking-of-a-power-marriage/
Put her name into Google Image Search and see for yourself.
It’s not kiddie pron if it’s on Google, is it?
Makes one wonder if the recent on/off press conference with the alleged underaged victim from 1993 was really nothing more than “getting in front of” what the Left/Establishment/Podesta/Hillary campaign knew was buried in those Podesta emails. In other words, obfuscation by associating Trump with misdeeds than in actuality the facts would suggest they themselves had been engaging in. They’ve been doing this purposeful projection for years ....
Photos are disturbing and dark.
The dogs look as though they have been abused.
Oh, if I only had more time, I could write a thesis on that...
Because you DO understand art. You have just been told that art is an intellectual exercise that only "sophisticates" understand. That's what they want you to believe. Any Rand wrote a book on this topic.
Art is simply a matter of taste. It is no different from music. As an art professor once told me, "Do you ever hear people questioning their taste in music? No. People hear what they like and they buy it. They will defend it vigorously. Their tastes may change over time, but you never hear people questioning their right to like or dislike music."
I did not know! Thank you!
I think that’s exactly what it was. Then they could have said “Well look, Trump has been accused of child rape so he has no right to talk about this”.
Not a single smile on any of those faces. Indeed, creepy. Tim Burton creepy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
