Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will John Kerry pardon Hillary Clinton on January 20th? He can.
January 17, 2017 | Pilsner

Posted on 01/17/2017 9:36:46 PM PST by Pilsner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: HandyDandy

>> I don’t think that Trump could get sworn in early while there is another standing President.

I’m thinking the swear-in has an effective date.

In my financial dealings with the U.S. govt, transactions have an “effective” date which now makes more sense given your comments.


61 posted on 01/17/2017 11:39:18 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith

I’m sure that’s a matter of state law.

Anyway: Trump will take the oath before the public ceremony begins. Thus, he will become President exactly at noon, fully empowered to execute the office.

This entire thread is idiotic and bizarre.


62 posted on 01/17/2017 11:40:16 PM PST by Arthur McGowan (https://youtu.be/IYUYya6bPGw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

Al Haig, is that you?


63 posted on 01/17/2017 11:49:57 PM PST by Cvengr ( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChronicMA; Pilsner
"the Prez takes oath just before noon"

Well, that would be a huge LOL in history then. Kerry, thinking that he has the authority to pardon Hillary, does so. Then, he finds out that Trump has already been sworn in. Such FUN!

64 posted on 01/18/2017 12:24:16 AM PST by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner
Preposterous nonsense, like the claim that 0bama could make a "recess appointment" of a Supreme Court Justice in the "recess" between one Congress and the next.

The Supreme Court has already ruled numerous times on issues like this, most recently in National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning , finding unanimously, that a technical interregnum during which there is no practical time for an official to act does not constitute a valid exception case either Constitutionally nor statutorily.

As far as the US Constitution is concerned, there is ZERO practical lapse between the administration of one President and the next.

Give it up.

65 posted on 01/18/2017 12:52:45 AM PST by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come 'round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zaxtres

The Supreme Court has ruled on these questions in several cases. There is no practical lapse in the SCOTUS interpretation of US law between one administration and the next.


66 posted on 01/18/2017 12:54:27 AM PST by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come 'round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: All

the biggest favor Obama could do for Trump would be to pardon Hillary.


67 posted on 01/18/2017 12:56:50 AM PST by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
This entire thread is idiotic and bizarre.

It's also nonsense from the perspective of case law. The Supreme Court has ruled on questions like this several times, and each time they've made the same finding: a slight theoretical lapse in time between two Constitutional or statutory events does not constitute a sufficient cause in law for the exceptions to be allowed. John Kerry will not be "acting President" under any definition the Supreme Court has ever considered valid.

68 posted on 01/18/2017 12:59:50 AM PST by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come 'round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

Has Hillary even applied for a pardon?


69 posted on 01/18/2017 1:40:05 AM PST by jazminerose (Adorable Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

How many Political Pundits and Lawyers can dance the minuet on the head of a Campaign Map push-pin?

Can they still do this while playing “Mother-May-I” and “Simon-Says”?

If a Bureaucrat falls in the forest, can we “Shoot-Shovel-Shutup” without having to do an Environmental Impact Study?

Questions, so many questions!


70 posted on 01/18/2017 1:53:02 AM PST by BwanaNdege ("The church ... is not the master or the servant of the state, but the conscience" - Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

No. Legally bullshit. For one thing, Kerry won’t be Secretary of State at that point. For another, he also can’t have Presidential authority without also having taken the Oath of Office.


71 posted on 01/18/2017 2:23:46 AM PST by sourcery (Non Acquiescit: "I do not consent" (Latin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

Reread amendment 20. You got it wrong. If there is an acting President, it would be Paul Ryan. But I don’t think anyone would try to find out. they are still trying to figure out who was President between Mar 4 and 5 1849 because Zachary Taylor wouldn’t take the oath on Sun Mar 4. Supposedly the President pro Tempore of the Senate David Acheson was “President for a day” because that was the order of succession then


72 posted on 01/18/2017 2:34:33 AM PST by BigEdLB (To Dimwitocrats: We won. You lost. Get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

Check the Presidential Succession Act. Paul Ryan would have to resign his seat in the Congress to become acting president. Al Haig was right.

The Presidential Succession Act was different in Zachary Taylor’s day.


73 posted on 01/18/2017 2:48:53 AM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

Too many assumptions. Even if some of this were correct, the House Speaker would still have to be offered the position before turning it down.


74 posted on 01/18/2017 3:07:43 AM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
I think one thing many here are just blowing right by. A lot of the OP argument centers around weird circumstances, ALL surrounding the taking of the Oath of Office by the President. Where the argument really breaks down in this concatenation of highly improbable events is that it is assumed someone somehow magically technically becomes the President of the United States for some period. What this litany neglects to address is that the SAME oath of office would have to be administered to each prospective ‘President’.....that of course not having a snowball's chance in hell happening before the real President takes his oath.
75 posted on 01/18/2017 3:34:20 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

Try running that argument through a federal court and see how far you get.


76 posted on 01/18/2017 3:48:06 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
Beyond stupid. How does Kerry sidestep the vp and take the oath before Trump?

If you and and every other Freeper posting posting blather about how the job has to be offered to, and turned down, by the Speaker, or President pro tempore, before the Secretary of State gets a chance to act as President, and/or that the Secretary of State has to take the Presidential oath before acting as President, would bother to read the XXth Amendment, and Presidential Succession Act, you would see that the power to act as President devolves to the Secretary of State automatically, instantly. The Amendment and law were crafted so that if the Soviets nuked the President and Vice President, the remaining US Government would have an official who was acting President, without any delay for consultation, resignation, oath taking, and the like. In the event of a prolonged interval without a duly elected President, who has qualified by taking the oath, the Speaker, or President pro tempore, may resign, take the Presidential oath, and become acting President ahead of the Secretary of State, but until they do the Secretary of State is also acting President.

77 posted on 01/18/2017 4:27:50 AM PST by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

if so apply tar, and feathers liberally until lurch, obozzo, and the bunch wear feathers for years


78 posted on 01/18/2017 4:34:39 AM PST by aces (Got Jesus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner
In a monarchy the period between the death of one monarch, and the crowning of a successor, is an “interregnum” or interval between reigns, and technically the land is without a government during that time.

Also false, in the United Kingdom and the other Commonwealth Realms the powers of office pass to the new monarch immediately upon the Demise of the Crown. There is no gap. "The King is dead. Long live the King!" represents the legal fact that the transfer of power is instantaneous. While there are legal formalities to follow, up to and including the Coronation. The Crown has passed from one monarch to the next.

The same applies to the Presidency. Barack Obama ceases to be President at Noon EST on 20 January 2017. Donald Trump becomes President at Noon on 20 January 2017.

He has to take the oath, but he is already President at that moment. Lyndon Johnson became President when John Kennedy died, not when he took the oath.

The oath is a requirement, yes, but in an emergency the President can act if there is no time to take the oath, as long has he does so within a reasonable time frame.

79 posted on 01/18/2017 4:34:54 AM PST by GreenLanternCorps (Hi! I'm the Dread Pirate Roberts! (TM) Ask about franchise opportunities in your area.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

personally I believe if Hillary is not indicted immediately as an obvious violation we have not changed anything and our country is a sham..no one can have a private server for classified work period..nothing more is needed, what some nuance to study..no criminal activity deserves justice, and if the elite are let go the elite need to get kicked to the curb before we are war to preserve their status quo


80 posted on 01/18/2017 4:37:02 AM PST by aces (Got Jesus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson