General Musings of Human Nature (Vanity)

2/22/2017 | Honu Rider

[honurider]

I do believe that one of the most interesting of lessons, among many; to be learned in the last election cycle is actually somewhat paradoxical.

Although, humanity’s abilities to gather and process data has increased exponentially; it has not demonstrated a substantially increased ability to understand that, which it has gathered.

The ‘gray’ area between the efficient and inefficient, is an infinite abyss.

It is not a question of subjectives, 'right','good', 'wrong' or 'bad/evil'.

It is simply, efficient or inefficient: there is no mystery.

Look I am on Twitter. I like it for its 'questionable' but often entertaining, informational contributions to the (cess)pool of information already out there in the 'social media-verse'.

So many of the conversations remind me of;'like','you know like','the old valley girl' mentality. Oh is that 'sexist'.

Side note about truth; for you guys with ladies that go out often with the girls, clubbing.

I lived in Hawaii; in one of my many occupations and experimentations in understanding human behavior from a direct involvement point of view; was to be a 'bar back' at a club. This club often often hosted male strippers.

At this time I was also a Real Estate Appraiser, that specialized in 'high end' homes, in my “day job”. Our company was one of the largest in the state. Point is, in one way or another I knew a great deal of the clientèle of the club, some cases in great detail.

Without getting into those "details", you all have your own dirty little minds, however. I will reveal the following:

1) males drool, and females get downright insane.

Seriously, guys at a stripper bar are typically downright boring, I believe it has to do with; dick to brain blood ratios. Come on really, have you ever seen or heard anything intelligent or enlightening, emanate from a drooling, drunk, male? Guess nothing more to say here.

2) 'Tequila does make her clothes come off'; her and many of her friends. At least to varying degrees.

I guess I should stop here while I am ahead. Damn some of those ladies broke my heart, as well as few chairs, tables, glasses, dancing poles, etc.. I still have some painful reminders of fabulous events.

Onwards and upwards, the previous is a true glimpse of humanity. This next part is ‘nutty’.

From the perspective of an outside, 3rd party, observer; I believe an intergalactic biologist would conclude, humanity to be a species, both awe inspiring and heart-breaking at the same time. Of course this is predicated on some anthropomorphizing on my part; assuming my hypothetical aliens would:

Operate under the same physics and their tactile senses are similar; light, sound, heat, pressure etc. and hopefully possess a similar thought/emotion mental component. Those of you particularly into science fiction, you know what I mean.

Each member of a quantum-entangled pair is an individual and unique point. Even if you argue it is one thing in two places; it is in two places.

Point Time (when) + Point Space (where) = Point Place (x,y,z, ‘slice’ of t determined by tense) over (blurry part) and can be a ‘POV’ (point of view); projecting a sphere of perspective, the radius of which its furthest ‘known’ is ‘∆’ on and on. Human limits are individually ‘self-created/ing’ and very fluid/dynamic. Although generally radiating out from the core, inward collapse is not an uncommon observation. Inward collapse though is not a ‘backwards run in time’ but a ‘running over’, will in a sense produce a fold.

note: equation is result when ‘uncertainty’ is removed; I know intuitive, but the essential difference between humans and their creation the ‘computer’ is: many times in sentient organic life, a choice has to be made based on little or no information. We pull the required ‘knowns or givens’(aka assumptions and/or ceteris paribus) from, or based on, ‘thin air’, or in other words we ‘make it up’; although this sounds like economics it is also a part of the foundational concepts used in the ‘psychological’ component I call ‘spheres’; ‘spheres’ of whatever for right now. And now the error of this whole line of thought is that ‘Uncertainty’ can never be completely removed.

No. No matter what you say, ‘human made’ computers do not ‘choose’, (running ‘and/or- ‘if/then loops’, etc; is not choosing), these machines cannot guess and cannot form opinions. This last part is partially due to the fact; ‘to have an opinion requires an advanced alimentary canal’; which from one POV, can be considered as an interchangeable-entangled pair - if you catch the drift.

If something is absolutely static, it is static; therefore it cannot change in any way. So any static is always static, it is not a “once was ‘anything’ ”. And so it is with that which is dynamic in its nature, something that changes will always change. Right now there is nothing in science that is identified as “permanent” or “immutable/static”.

note note: I have a thesis underdevelopment of which the conceptual properties of ‘T/time’. Time is realized in two ways; as a ‘physical’ tangible component and part of a universal constant of expansion; and a localized psychological factor of a sentient/biological, non-immortal life-form’s understanding of relative existence.

Taking the immortal ‘thingy’ first; ‘the concept of time to this entity/being/Q/whatever, serves only one purpose and that is to communicate in some form with others of its kind, or similar kind, possibly. Point is, that the psychological concept of time to an immortal is most likely irrelevant. Say for example, an immortal goes to sleeps and does so for; 100 days, 100 years, 1,000 years, or 1million years (earth human - time reference used) when its awakes it is still “tomorrow”. But if its wants to share ‘when’ something happened, regardless of the scale, everything needs, and everything communicated has need, for a common reference. Otherwise what is the point?

Therefore, to me, it seems intuitive both mathematically and psychologically that I exist within a physical sphere of relevance in the which center is, center X,Y,Z,/whatever label is used for the location of center/universe. This sphere of influence effects both my general physical sphere and my personal psychological sphere, in other words my understanding of existence. I realize my POV can never be separated from me. I change, the center of an expanding universe does not, ;-).

When examining a hollow sphere there can be only two general ‘points of view’; from the inside or from the outside.

It is this difference in perspectives that effects the psychology of the individual. It is easy at this point to identify these spheres as, ‘spheres of influence’; either as ‘general physical’ (common knowledge,etc) or ‘individual psychological’ (personal experiences,etc). Damn, I broke into the ‘sphere thing’;

Inside the sphere; a person is either safe or trapped.

Outside the sphere; a person is either vulnerable or free.

In this sense it is also obvious that ‘free’ is not exactly the same as ‘liberty’.

Oh well that was fun now to see if this posted okay. This is a test for a long post; parts of which were copied into this from different formats.

[mad_as_he$$]

Quantum physics and strippers? All righty then.

[outofsalt]

I'll tuck a buck in for your thread.

[RegulatorCountry]

Is a quantum entangled pair of strippers always in the same state of undress or are they dipolar?

[honurider]

I guess that would depend on POV; if I am between the pair I might not know what state of undress the one behind me may be in. Actually that does not work in QM and is hazardous to the furniture

Obviously from the outside 3rd party (boring) non-participant I would know. LOL

Hey but you gotta admit not bad for morning coffee ramblings

[Don W]

Basic Laws of Human Stupidity